腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的效果对比

Y. Limbu, S. Regmee, Spandan Darshan Adhikari, Bidur Prasad Acharya, R. Ghimire
{"title":"腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的效果对比","authors":"Y. Limbu, S. Regmee, Spandan Darshan Adhikari, Bidur Prasad Acharya, R. Ghimire","doi":"10.3126/nmcj.v25i4.60922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The worldwide trend of appendectomy is shifting from conventional open to the laparoscopic technique. The study’s objective was to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of various operative and postoperative parameters to find the best operative technique. A prospective comparative study was conducted on 142 patients undergoing laparoscopic (n=43) or open appendectomy (n=99) from 1st February 2022 to 30th January 2023 under the Department of Surgery of Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (KMCTH). In five patients, laparoscopic appendectomy was later converted to open and excluded from the study. The mean operating time for the open appendectomy group was 44.1±13.1 minutes while for the laparoscopic appendectomy group, it was 48.4±14.0 minutes (p=0.047). Visual analogue score taken on 1st, 7th and 30th post-operative day for open and laparoscopic appendectomy were 4.0±2.2 vs 3.6±1.9 (p=0.160); 1.4±1.3 vs 0.6±0.9 (p<0.001) and 0.2±0.5 vs 0.02±0.15 (p=0.107) respectively. The total days of postoperative hospital stay were 1.57±0.96 for open appendectomy and 1.58±1.07 for laparoscopic appendectomy (p=0.843). However, laparoscopic appendectomy group had an earlier return to normal activity (7.30±1.15 days) when compared to the open appendectomy group (8.05±2.42 days) (p=0.023). The laparoscopic appendectomy group also had fewer postoperative complications than the open appendectomy group (18.6% vs 24.2%) (p=0.411). Thus, laparoscopy is a safe and effective method of removal of appendix for acute appendicitis.","PeriodicalId":506882,"journal":{"name":"Nepal Medical College Journal","volume":"179 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in the management of acute appendicitis\",\"authors\":\"Y. Limbu, S. Regmee, Spandan Darshan Adhikari, Bidur Prasad Acharya, R. Ghimire\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/nmcj.v25i4.60922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The worldwide trend of appendectomy is shifting from conventional open to the laparoscopic technique. The study’s objective was to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of various operative and postoperative parameters to find the best operative technique. A prospective comparative study was conducted on 142 patients undergoing laparoscopic (n=43) or open appendectomy (n=99) from 1st February 2022 to 30th January 2023 under the Department of Surgery of Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (KMCTH). In five patients, laparoscopic appendectomy was later converted to open and excluded from the study. The mean operating time for the open appendectomy group was 44.1±13.1 minutes while for the laparoscopic appendectomy group, it was 48.4±14.0 minutes (p=0.047). Visual analogue score taken on 1st, 7th and 30th post-operative day for open and laparoscopic appendectomy were 4.0±2.2 vs 3.6±1.9 (p=0.160); 1.4±1.3 vs 0.6±0.9 (p<0.001) and 0.2±0.5 vs 0.02±0.15 (p=0.107) respectively. The total days of postoperative hospital stay were 1.57±0.96 for open appendectomy and 1.58±1.07 for laparoscopic appendectomy (p=0.843). However, laparoscopic appendectomy group had an earlier return to normal activity (7.30±1.15 days) when compared to the open appendectomy group (8.05±2.42 days) (p=0.023). The laparoscopic appendectomy group also had fewer postoperative complications than the open appendectomy group (18.6% vs 24.2%) (p=0.411). Thus, laparoscopy is a safe and effective method of removal of appendix for acute appendicitis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nepal Medical College Journal\",\"volume\":\"179 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nepal Medical College Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/nmcj.v25i4.60922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepal Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nmcj.v25i4.60922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球阑尾切除术的趋势正从传统的开腹手术转向腹腔镜技术。本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开腹阑尾切除术的各种手术和术后参数,以找出最佳手术技术。自2022年2月1日至2023年1月30日,加德满都医学院教学医院(KMCTH)外科对142名接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术(43人)或开腹阑尾切除术(99人)的患者进行了前瞻性比较研究。有五名患者的腹腔镜阑尾切除术后来转为开腹手术,并被排除在研究之外。开腹阑尾切除术组的平均手术时间为(44.1±13.1)分钟,而腹腔镜阑尾切除术组为(48.4±14.0)分钟(P=0.047)。开腹和腹腔镜阑尾切除术后第1天、第7天和第30天的视觉模拟评分分别为4.0±2.2 vs 3.6±1.9(p=0.160);1.4±1.3 vs 0.6±0.9(p<0.001)和0.2±0.5 vs 0.02±0.15(p=0.107)。开腹阑尾切除术的术后住院总天数为1.57±0.96天,腹腔镜阑尾切除术为1.58±1.07天(P=0.843)。然而,与开腹阑尾切除术组(8.05±2.42 天)相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术组恢复正常活动的时间更早(7.30±1.15 天)(P=0.023)。腹腔镜阑尾切除术组的术后并发症也少于开腹阑尾切除术组(18.6% vs 24.2%)(P=0.411)。因此,腹腔镜是一种安全有效的急性阑尾炎阑尾切除方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcome of laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in the management of acute appendicitis
The worldwide trend of appendectomy is shifting from conventional open to the laparoscopic technique. The study’s objective was to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of various operative and postoperative parameters to find the best operative technique. A prospective comparative study was conducted on 142 patients undergoing laparoscopic (n=43) or open appendectomy (n=99) from 1st February 2022 to 30th January 2023 under the Department of Surgery of Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (KMCTH). In five patients, laparoscopic appendectomy was later converted to open and excluded from the study. The mean operating time for the open appendectomy group was 44.1±13.1 minutes while for the laparoscopic appendectomy group, it was 48.4±14.0 minutes (p=0.047). Visual analogue score taken on 1st, 7th and 30th post-operative day for open and laparoscopic appendectomy were 4.0±2.2 vs 3.6±1.9 (p=0.160); 1.4±1.3 vs 0.6±0.9 (p<0.001) and 0.2±0.5 vs 0.02±0.15 (p=0.107) respectively. The total days of postoperative hospital stay were 1.57±0.96 for open appendectomy and 1.58±1.07 for laparoscopic appendectomy (p=0.843). However, laparoscopic appendectomy group had an earlier return to normal activity (7.30±1.15 days) when compared to the open appendectomy group (8.05±2.42 days) (p=0.023). The laparoscopic appendectomy group also had fewer postoperative complications than the open appendectomy group (18.6% vs 24.2%) (p=0.411). Thus, laparoscopy is a safe and effective method of removal of appendix for acute appendicitis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discharge Against Medical Advice Among Neonates Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital The Association between S.T.O.N.E. Nephrolithometry Score and Hemoglobin Drop in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Perception of Objective Structured Clinical Examination Among Undergraduates Medical Students Knowledge of Tooth Discoloration and Tooth Bleaching amongst Adult Patients Visiting a Dental Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal Study of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome of Acute Kidney Injury in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Tertiary Care Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1