柬埔寨和韩国小学教师培训制度的比较分析:对柬埔寨改革的启示

Lach, Akasy, Sookyong Nam
{"title":"柬埔寨和韩国小学教师培训制度的比较分析:对柬埔寨改革的启示","authors":"Lach, Akasy, Sookyong Nam","doi":"10.20306/kces.2023.33.5.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Research purpose]This study compares primary school teacher training systems in Cambodia and Korea, aiming to provide insights for future reforms in Cambodia. [Methodology]Through a literature review, an analysis, and a survey of Cambodian educators, we identify similarities and differences in the development processes of the two systems. [Results]Cambodia's system resembles Korea's during the 1980s and 1990s, reflecting transitions to four-year university-level training. However, challenges persist in Cambodia's system, with limitations in evaluating candidate’s teaching suitability, curriculum adaptability, and a loose certification and recruitment framework. Survey responses from Cambodian educators express positivity towards the implications drawn from the study. [Conclusion]The study recommends gradual reforms in Cambodia, emphasizing removing traditional testing and curriculum components and integrating competence-based elements, mirroring Korea's successful trajectory.","PeriodicalId":135100,"journal":{"name":"Korean Comparative Education Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Primary School Teacher Training Systems in Cambodia and Korea: Insights for Reforms in Cambodia\",\"authors\":\"Lach, Akasy, Sookyong Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.20306/kces.2023.33.5.151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[Research purpose]This study compares primary school teacher training systems in Cambodia and Korea, aiming to provide insights for future reforms in Cambodia. [Methodology]Through a literature review, an analysis, and a survey of Cambodian educators, we identify similarities and differences in the development processes of the two systems. [Results]Cambodia's system resembles Korea's during the 1980s and 1990s, reflecting transitions to four-year university-level training. However, challenges persist in Cambodia's system, with limitations in evaluating candidate’s teaching suitability, curriculum adaptability, and a loose certification and recruitment framework. Survey responses from Cambodian educators express positivity towards the implications drawn from the study. [Conclusion]The study recommends gradual reforms in Cambodia, emphasizing removing traditional testing and curriculum components and integrating competence-based elements, mirroring Korea's successful trajectory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Comparative Education Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Comparative Education Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20306/kces.2023.33.5.151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Comparative Education Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20306/kces.2023.33.5.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

[研究目的]本研究比较了柬埔寨和韩国的小学教师培训制度,旨在为柬埔寨未来的改革提供启示。 [方法]通过文献综述、分析和对柬埔寨教育工作者的调查,我们找出了两种制度在发展过程中的异同。 [结果]柬埔寨的教育体制与韩国 20 世纪 80 年代和 90 年代的教育体制相似,反映了向四年制大学教育的过渡。然而,柬埔寨的教育体系仍面临挑战,在评估候选人的教学适应性、课程适应性方面存在局限,认证和招聘框架也较为松散。柬埔寨教育工作者的调查反馈对本研究的意义表示肯定。 [结论]本研究建议柬埔寨参照韩国的成功经验,逐步进行改革,强调取消传统的考试和课程内容,融入以能力为基础的要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Primary School Teacher Training Systems in Cambodia and Korea: Insights for Reforms in Cambodia
[Research purpose]This study compares primary school teacher training systems in Cambodia and Korea, aiming to provide insights for future reforms in Cambodia. [Methodology]Through a literature review, an analysis, and a survey of Cambodian educators, we identify similarities and differences in the development processes of the two systems. [Results]Cambodia's system resembles Korea's during the 1980s and 1990s, reflecting transitions to four-year university-level training. However, challenges persist in Cambodia's system, with limitations in evaluating candidate’s teaching suitability, curriculum adaptability, and a loose certification and recruitment framework. Survey responses from Cambodian educators express positivity towards the implications drawn from the study. [Conclusion]The study recommends gradual reforms in Cambodia, emphasizing removing traditional testing and curriculum components and integrating competence-based elements, mirroring Korea's successful trajectory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Title I Programs on Students Proficiency in the U.S. and Implications for Korea Comparative Analysis of Primary School Teacher Training Systems in Cambodia and Korea: Insights for Reforms in Cambodia The Impact of Family Background, School Experience, and Academic Efficacy on Academic Achievement of College Students in Vietnam A Qualitative Comparative Study on How Multiculturalism Is Embraced in Primary School Settings in New Zealand and Korea through Teachers’ Experiences A Comparative Analysis of the Student Loan Systems in China with the United States Federal Student Loan Programs in the Context of Higher Education Universalisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1