通过测量对海上交通线上主要威胁的战斗力,确定海上有人无人系统的发展方向

Yong-Hoon Kim, Yonghoon Ha
{"title":"通过测量对海上交通线上主要威胁的战斗力,确定海上有人无人系统的发展方向","authors":"Yong-Hoon Kim, Yonghoon Ha","doi":"10.22678/jic.2023.21.11.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"such as Delphi and AHP were used to measure combat effectiveness, and the AHP survey was conducted on 40 naval officers, including 25 senior officers who are well-understood in the combat effectiveness of the weapons system and MUM-T. As an evaluation index for measuring combat effectiveness, the OODA loop was set as the main attribute, followed by Observe(0.358), Orient(0.315), Act(0.217), and Decide(0.110). The combat effectiveness of each major threat in SLOC, the lowest alternative, was measured to be 1.68 times higher than the response to maritime conflicts in neighboring countries and 3.61 times higher than the response to transnational threats. These results are expected to support rational decision-making in determining the level of technology required for acquisition of marine manned-unmanned systems and establishing operational plans for naval forces.","PeriodicalId":15984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Convergence","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development Direction of Maritime Manned-Unmanned Systems through Measurement of Combat Effectiveness against Major Threats on Sea Lines of Communication\",\"authors\":\"Yong-Hoon Kim, Yonghoon Ha\",\"doi\":\"10.22678/jic.2023.21.11.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"such as Delphi and AHP were used to measure combat effectiveness, and the AHP survey was conducted on 40 naval officers, including 25 senior officers who are well-understood in the combat effectiveness of the weapons system and MUM-T. As an evaluation index for measuring combat effectiveness, the OODA loop was set as the main attribute, followed by Observe(0.358), Orient(0.315), Act(0.217), and Decide(0.110). The combat effectiveness of each major threat in SLOC, the lowest alternative, was measured to be 1.68 times higher than the response to maritime conflicts in neighboring countries and 3.61 times higher than the response to transnational threats. These results are expected to support rational decision-making in determining the level of technology required for acquisition of marine manned-unmanned systems and establishing operational plans for naval forces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial Convergence\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial Convergence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22678/jic.2023.21.11.029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Convergence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22678/jic.2023.21.11.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

AHP调查对象为40名海军军官,其中包括25名了解武器系统和MUM-T战斗力的高级军官。作为衡量战斗力的评价指标,OODA 循环被设定为主要属性,其次是观察(0.358)、定向(0.315)、行动(0.217)和决策(0.110)。经测算,在 SLOC(最低备选方案)中应对各主要威胁的战斗力比应对邻国海上冲突的战斗力高 1.68 倍,比应对跨国威胁的战斗力高 3.61 倍。这些结果有望为合理决策提供支持,以确定购置海洋有人无人系统所需的技术水平,并制定海军部队的作战计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development Direction of Maritime Manned-Unmanned Systems through Measurement of Combat Effectiveness against Major Threats on Sea Lines of Communication
such as Delphi and AHP were used to measure combat effectiveness, and the AHP survey was conducted on 40 naval officers, including 25 senior officers who are well-understood in the combat effectiveness of the weapons system and MUM-T. As an evaluation index for measuring combat effectiveness, the OODA loop was set as the main attribute, followed by Observe(0.358), Orient(0.315), Act(0.217), and Decide(0.110). The combat effectiveness of each major threat in SLOC, the lowest alternative, was measured to be 1.68 times higher than the response to maritime conflicts in neighboring countries and 3.61 times higher than the response to transnational threats. These results are expected to support rational decision-making in determining the level of technology required for acquisition of marine manned-unmanned systems and establishing operational plans for naval forces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning Flow and Problem-solving Confidence of Nursing Students Experienced Team-based Nursing Practice Learning : The Mediating Effect of Perceived Interactivity The Effect of Academic Emotions, Learning Flow and Perceived Teaching Presence on Academic Achievement among Undergraduate Nursing Students in an Uncontacted Online Class Learning Influence of Emotional Intelligence, Communication Competence, and Interpersonal Competence on Adaptation to College Life in Nursing Students Development Direction of Maritime Manned-Unmanned Systems through Measurement of Combat Effectiveness against Major Threats on Sea Lines of Communication The Effect of Adolescent Mental Health on Heavy drinking Experience : A Study Based on the 18th Annual Youth Health Behavior Survey of 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1