种质库中有多少物种会改名?对安亨比试验站桉树种质库的研究及其实际意义

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 FORESTRY Scientia Forestalis Pub Date : 2023-11-28 DOI:10.18671/scifor.v51.27
Paulo Henrique Muller Silva, Teotonio Francisco de Assis, David Bush, David Kleinig, Cristiane Aparecida Fioravante Reis
{"title":"种质库中有多少物种会改名?对安亨比试验站桉树种质库的研究及其实际意义","authors":"Paulo Henrique Muller Silva, Teotonio Francisco de Assis, David Bush, David Kleinig, Cristiane Aparecida Fioravante Reis","doi":"10.18671/scifor.v51.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eucalypts are a long-cycle crop that have been introduced in Brazil during several decades. The germplasm banks of the country make available several populations whose botanical classifications are somewhat outdated since these classifications have been subject to several modifications over the years. This study outlines a review of species with outdated classifications in the Anhembi Experimental Station of Forest Sciences (ESALQ/USP), one of Brazil’s main eucalypt germplasm banks and discusses the possible implications for the breeding programs that use said germplasm. In this survey, we found records that indicate introductions were made of populations of 20 eucalypts species. However, this number has increased according to the most recent update of botanical classifications, and the Anhembi Germplasm Bank has currently 22 species after a few species were reclassified. Furthermore, a major change has been the reclassification of some species from the genus Eucalyptus to the genus Corymbia. One original introduction, Eucalyptus maculata, is now considered to be (according to original provenances), Corymbia maculata and C. variegata . One species originally introduced as E. pellita has been renamed E. scias ; E. pellita still exists in north Queensland, Australia and Papua New Guinea, while E. scias has a much smaller southerly distribution in New South Wales, Australia. Similarly, an introduction of E. phaeotricha is now generally considered to be E. tindaliae, and an introduction of E. resinifera is now considered to be E. macta (according to the provenance area of the introduction). The confusing classification of the species is aggravated, in some cases, by the lack of detailed studies that allow comparing the species introduced with the same name, regarding wood productivity, tolerance and/or traits that are fundamental for defining the species to be introduced or worked on by the breeding programs.","PeriodicalId":54443,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Forestalis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How many species change names in a germplasm bank? Study of the Anhembi Experimental Station eucalypt germplasm bank and practical implications\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Henrique Muller Silva, Teotonio Francisco de Assis, David Bush, David Kleinig, Cristiane Aparecida Fioravante Reis\",\"doi\":\"10.18671/scifor.v51.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Eucalypts are a long-cycle crop that have been introduced in Brazil during several decades. The germplasm banks of the country make available several populations whose botanical classifications are somewhat outdated since these classifications have been subject to several modifications over the years. This study outlines a review of species with outdated classifications in the Anhembi Experimental Station of Forest Sciences (ESALQ/USP), one of Brazil’s main eucalypt germplasm banks and discusses the possible implications for the breeding programs that use said germplasm. In this survey, we found records that indicate introductions were made of populations of 20 eucalypts species. However, this number has increased according to the most recent update of botanical classifications, and the Anhembi Germplasm Bank has currently 22 species after a few species were reclassified. Furthermore, a major change has been the reclassification of some species from the genus Eucalyptus to the genus Corymbia. One original introduction, Eucalyptus maculata, is now considered to be (according to original provenances), Corymbia maculata and C. variegata . One species originally introduced as E. pellita has been renamed E. scias ; E. pellita still exists in north Queensland, Australia and Papua New Guinea, while E. scias has a much smaller southerly distribution in New South Wales, Australia. Similarly, an introduction of E. phaeotricha is now generally considered to be E. tindaliae, and an introduction of E. resinifera is now considered to be E. macta (according to the provenance area of the introduction). The confusing classification of the species is aggravated, in some cases, by the lack of detailed studies that allow comparing the species introduced with the same name, regarding wood productivity, tolerance and/or traits that are fundamental for defining the species to be introduced or worked on by the breeding programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientia Forestalis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientia Forestalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v51.27\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Forestalis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v51.27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

桉树是一种长周期作物,几十年来被引入巴西。巴西的种质库中有几个种群的植物学分类已经过时,因为这些分类多年来曾多次修改。本研究概述了巴西主要桉树种质库之一的安亨比森林科学实验站(ESALQ/USP)中分类过时的物种,并讨论了对使用这些种质的育种计划可能产生的影响。在这次调查中,我们发现有记录表明,巴西引进了 20 个桉树品种的种群。不过,根据最新更新的植物学分类,这一数字已经增加,安亨比种质库在对几个物种进行重新分类后,目前有 22 个物种。此外,一个重大变化是将一些物种从桉树属重新分类为伞形科。一个最初引入的物种,即 Eucalyptus maculata,现在被认为是(根据最初的产地)Corymbia maculata 和 C. variegata。E. pellita,而 E. scias 在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的南部分布较少。同样,引进的 E. phaeotricha 现在一般被认为是 E. tindaliae,而引进的 E. resinifera 现在被认为是 E. macta(根据引进的原产地)。在某些情况下,由于缺乏详细的研究,无法对引进的同名物种进行木材生产力、耐受性和/或性状方面的比较,从而加剧了物种分类的混乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How many species change names in a germplasm bank? Study of the Anhembi Experimental Station eucalypt germplasm bank and practical implications
Eucalypts are a long-cycle crop that have been introduced in Brazil during several decades. The germplasm banks of the country make available several populations whose botanical classifications are somewhat outdated since these classifications have been subject to several modifications over the years. This study outlines a review of species with outdated classifications in the Anhembi Experimental Station of Forest Sciences (ESALQ/USP), one of Brazil’s main eucalypt germplasm banks and discusses the possible implications for the breeding programs that use said germplasm. In this survey, we found records that indicate introductions were made of populations of 20 eucalypts species. However, this number has increased according to the most recent update of botanical classifications, and the Anhembi Germplasm Bank has currently 22 species after a few species were reclassified. Furthermore, a major change has been the reclassification of some species from the genus Eucalyptus to the genus Corymbia. One original introduction, Eucalyptus maculata, is now considered to be (according to original provenances), Corymbia maculata and C. variegata . One species originally introduced as E. pellita has been renamed E. scias ; E. pellita still exists in north Queensland, Australia and Papua New Guinea, while E. scias has a much smaller southerly distribution in New South Wales, Australia. Similarly, an introduction of E. phaeotricha is now generally considered to be E. tindaliae, and an introduction of E. resinifera is now considered to be E. macta (according to the provenance area of the introduction). The confusing classification of the species is aggravated, in some cases, by the lack of detailed studies that allow comparing the species introduced with the same name, regarding wood productivity, tolerance and/or traits that are fundamental for defining the species to be introduced or worked on by the breeding programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientia Forestalis
Scientia Forestalis Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Scientia Forestalis is a scientific publication of the IPEF – Institute of Forest Research and Studies, founded in 1968, as a nonprofit institution, in agreement with the LCF – Department of Forest Sciences of the ESALQ – Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture of the USP – São Paulo University. Scientia Forestalis, affiliated to the ABEC – Brazilian Association of Scientific Publishers, publishes four issues per year of original papers related to the several fields of the Forest Sciences. The Editorial Board is composed by the Editor, the Scientific Editors (evaluating the manuscript), and the Associated Editors (helping on the decision of acceptation or not of the manuscript, analyzed by the Peer-Reviewers.
期刊最新文献
Caracterização e modelagem biométrica de Dicksonia sellowiana Hook. em floresta ombrófila mista alto-montana Litter decomposition in Eucalyptus saligna Smith plantation in Pampa biome in southern of Brazil Qualidade de mudas de paricá [Schizolobium parahyba var. amazonicum (Huber ex Ducke) Barneby] em função de níveis de sombreamento e doses de húmus adicionadas ao substrato Wood properties of 32-year-old Peltophorum dubium wood from two seed provenances planted in Luiz Antônio - SP, Brazil Efeito de diferentes espaçamentos de plantio de Tachigali vulgaris L.G.Silva & H.C.Lima na fertilidade do solo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1