勘误:公众支持有助于民主生存吗?

IF 5 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE American Journal of Political Science Pub Date : 2023-09-23 DOI:10.1111/ajps.12828
Christopher Claassen
{"title":"勘误:公众支持有助于民主生存吗?","authors":"Christopher Claassen","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The author thanks Hu, Tai, and Solt (<span>2022</span>) for identifying these errors.</p><p>These errors have been corrected, democratic support re-estimated, and the analyses employed in the Claassen (<span>2020</span>) rerun. The corrected Tables 1 and 2 and Figures 1 and 3 are provided below. The corrected replication data set is available at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HWLW0J, as is a document with corrected supplementary information and analyses.</p><p>The corrected results are similar to those reported in the original article. For example, in model 1.1., Claassen (<span>2020</span>) originally reported an effect of support on democracy of 0.267 with a standard error of 0.094. In the corrected results, the corresponding coefficient and standard error are 0.273 and 0.094. As such, the corrected analyses confirm the conclusions drawn in Claassen (<span>2020</span>).</p>","PeriodicalId":48447,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Political Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajps.12828","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erratum: Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive?\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Claassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajps.12828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The author thanks Hu, Tai, and Solt (<span>2022</span>) for identifying these errors.</p><p>These errors have been corrected, democratic support re-estimated, and the analyses employed in the Claassen (<span>2020</span>) rerun. The corrected Tables 1 and 2 and Figures 1 and 3 are provided below. The corrected replication data set is available at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HWLW0J, as is a document with corrected supplementary information and analyses.</p><p>The corrected results are similar to those reported in the original article. For example, in model 1.1., Claassen (<span>2020</span>) originally reported an effect of support on democracy of 0.267 with a standard error of 0.094. In the corrected results, the corresponding coefficient and standard error are 0.273 and 0.094. As such, the corrected analyses confirm the conclusions drawn in Claassen (<span>2020</span>).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Political Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajps.12828\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12828\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12828","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者感谢 Hu、Tai 和 Solt(2022 年)指出了这些错误。这些错误已得到纠正,民主支持得到重新估计,Claassen(2020 年)中采用的分析方法也重新运行。下文提供了经更正的表 1 和表 2 以及图 1 和图 3。更正后的复制数据集可在 https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HWLW0J 网站上查阅,同时还有一份包含更正后的补充信息和分析的文件。更正后的结果与原文中报告的结果相似。例如,在模型 1.1 中,Claassen(2020 年)最初报告的支持对民主的影响为 0.267,标准误差为 0.094。在修正后的结果中,相应的系数和标准误差分别为 0.273 和 0.094。因此,修正后的分析结果证实了 Claassen(2020 年)得出的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Erratum: Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive?

The author thanks Hu, Tai, and Solt (2022) for identifying these errors.

These errors have been corrected, democratic support re-estimated, and the analyses employed in the Claassen (2020) rerun. The corrected Tables 1 and 2 and Figures 1 and 3 are provided below. The corrected replication data set is available at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HWLW0J, as is a document with corrected supplementary information and analyses.

The corrected results are similar to those reported in the original article. For example, in model 1.1., Claassen (2020) originally reported an effect of support on democracy of 0.267 with a standard error of 0.094. In the corrected results, the corresponding coefficient and standard error are 0.273 and 0.094. As such, the corrected analyses confirm the conclusions drawn in Claassen (2020).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) publishes research in all major areas of political science including American politics, public policy, international relations, comparative politics, political methodology, and political theory. Founded in 1956, the AJPS publishes articles that make outstanding contributions to scholarly knowledge about notable theoretical concerns, puzzles or controversies in any subfield of political science.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Correction to Skill specificity and attitudes toward immigration When politicians behave badly: Political, democratic, and social consequences of political incivility Comparing religious and secular interventions to increase young adult political participation: Evidence from WhatsApp‐based civic education courses in Zambia From powerholders to stakeholders: State‐building with elite compensation in early medieval China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1