丧亲支持策略与移情维度之间的关系

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Primenjena Psihologija Pub Date : 2023-06-29 DOI:10.19090/pp.v16i2.2449
Isidora Rajić, Ana Genc, Sanja Batić-Očovaj
{"title":"丧亲支持策略与移情维度之间的关系","authors":"Isidora Rajić, Ana Genc, Sanja Batić-Očovaj","doi":"10.19090/pp.v16i2.2449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Helpful and unhelpful bereavement support strategies have been identified in many studies. However, few studies have researched the reasons for choosing different ways of supporting the bereaved. Taking this into account, the current study aimed to analyze the relationships between empathy dimensions (Empathy with negative emotions, Empathy with positive emotions, Empathy as a social role, and Emotional reactions provoked by empathy) and bereavement support strategies (Social support/offering practical help, Minimizing feelings, Providing a religious perspective, and Complimenting the deceased and/or bereaved). The Bereaved Support Questionnaire and the Empathy Assessment Questionnaire were administered online to a sample of 271 participants (68.3% female). Descriptive statistics revealed the tendency of respondents to achieve higher than average scores on all empathy dimensions, except on Empathy with negative emotions. This finding points to a difficulty in consoling the bereaved, as they are mostly faced with unpleasant feelings. The respondents showed a slight preference to choose supportive messages that are high in person-centeredness, over those belonging to the Minimizing feelings and Providing a religious perspective subscale. Pearson’s correlation and network analysis indicated that empathy is positively associated with the use of high person-centered approach to support (Social support/offering practical help and Complimenting the deceased and/or bereaved). However, results have also shown that the inclination to use these types of messages is to some extent accompanied with a tendency to minimize the feelings of the bereaved. The article discusses possible interpretations of these findings, as well as guidelines for implementing the findings in bereavement support.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships between Bereavement Support Strategies and Empathy Dimensions\",\"authors\":\"Isidora Rajić, Ana Genc, Sanja Batić-Očovaj\",\"doi\":\"10.19090/pp.v16i2.2449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Helpful and unhelpful bereavement support strategies have been identified in many studies. However, few studies have researched the reasons for choosing different ways of supporting the bereaved. Taking this into account, the current study aimed to analyze the relationships between empathy dimensions (Empathy with negative emotions, Empathy with positive emotions, Empathy as a social role, and Emotional reactions provoked by empathy) and bereavement support strategies (Social support/offering practical help, Minimizing feelings, Providing a religious perspective, and Complimenting the deceased and/or bereaved). The Bereaved Support Questionnaire and the Empathy Assessment Questionnaire were administered online to a sample of 271 participants (68.3% female). Descriptive statistics revealed the tendency of respondents to achieve higher than average scores on all empathy dimensions, except on Empathy with negative emotions. This finding points to a difficulty in consoling the bereaved, as they are mostly faced with unpleasant feelings. The respondents showed a slight preference to choose supportive messages that are high in person-centeredness, over those belonging to the Minimizing feelings and Providing a religious perspective subscale. Pearson’s correlation and network analysis indicated that empathy is positively associated with the use of high person-centered approach to support (Social support/offering practical help and Complimenting the deceased and/or bereaved). However, results have also shown that the inclination to use these types of messages is to some extent accompanied with a tendency to minimize the feelings of the bereaved. The article discusses possible interpretations of these findings, as well as guidelines for implementing the findings in bereavement support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primenjena Psihologija\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primenjena Psihologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.v16i2.2449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primenjena Psihologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.v16i2.2449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多研究都指出了有益和无益的丧亲支持策略。然而,很少有研究对选择不同丧亲支持方式的原因进行研究。有鉴于此,本研究旨在分析移情维度(对负面情绪的移情、对正面情绪的移情、作为社会角色的移情、由移情引发的情绪反应)与丧亲支持策略(社会支持/提供实际帮助、尽量减少感受、提供宗教视角、赞美逝者和/或丧亲者)之间的关系。研究人员通过网络对 271 名参与者(68.3% 为女性)进行了丧亲支持问卷和移情评估问卷调查。描述性统计结果显示,受访者倾向于在所有移情维度上都获得高于平均水平的分数,但对负面情绪的移情除外。这一结果表明,由于丧亲者面对的大多是不愉快的情绪,因此很难对他们进行安慰。受访者略微倾向于选择那些以人为中心的支持性信息,而不是那些属于 "最小化感受 "和 "提供宗教视角 "分量表的信息。皮尔逊相关性和网络分析表明,移情与使用以人为本的高支持方法(社会支持/提供实际帮助和赞美逝者和/或遗属)呈正相关。然而,结果也表明,使用这些类型信息的倾向在一定程度上伴随着将丧亲者的感受最小化的倾向。文章讨论了对这些研究结果的可能解释,以及在丧亲支持中实施这些研究结果的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationships between Bereavement Support Strategies and Empathy Dimensions
Helpful and unhelpful bereavement support strategies have been identified in many studies. However, few studies have researched the reasons for choosing different ways of supporting the bereaved. Taking this into account, the current study aimed to analyze the relationships between empathy dimensions (Empathy with negative emotions, Empathy with positive emotions, Empathy as a social role, and Emotional reactions provoked by empathy) and bereavement support strategies (Social support/offering practical help, Minimizing feelings, Providing a religious perspective, and Complimenting the deceased and/or bereaved). The Bereaved Support Questionnaire and the Empathy Assessment Questionnaire were administered online to a sample of 271 participants (68.3% female). Descriptive statistics revealed the tendency of respondents to achieve higher than average scores on all empathy dimensions, except on Empathy with negative emotions. This finding points to a difficulty in consoling the bereaved, as they are mostly faced with unpleasant feelings. The respondents showed a slight preference to choose supportive messages that are high in person-centeredness, over those belonging to the Minimizing feelings and Providing a religious perspective subscale. Pearson’s correlation and network analysis indicated that empathy is positively associated with the use of high person-centered approach to support (Social support/offering practical help and Complimenting the deceased and/or bereaved). However, results have also shown that the inclination to use these types of messages is to some extent accompanied with a tendency to minimize the feelings of the bereaved. The article discusses possible interpretations of these findings, as well as guidelines for implementing the findings in bereavement support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Primenjena Psihologija
Primenjena Psihologija PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology publishes original papers, brief communications, and review articles that deal with diverse areas of research in applied psychology including, but not limited to, organizational, social, educational, developmental, mental health, counseling, and sport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Analiza (mal)adaptivnih aspekata sadizma kroz njegovu ulogu u Sindromu životnog tempa Efekt školske klime i otpornosti na svakodnevni akademski stres na dobrobiti i školski uspjeh srednjoškolaca Relacije karakteristika posla, izgaranja i namere za napuštanje organizacije u Modelu radni zahtevi-resursi Uloga pozitivnog mentalnog zdravlja u odnosu između stresa i depresivnih simptoma za vrijeme pandemije Psihometrijske karakteristike skale za ispitivanje stavova mladih prema nasilju u partnerskim odnosima
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1