为重症监护病房的姑息关怀制定质量指标,并通过电子病历审查进行试点测试。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1186/s40560-023-00713-z
Yuta Tanaka, Kento Masukawa, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Akane Kato, Yuichiro Ishigami, Junko Tatsuno, Kaori Ito, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Mitsunori Miyashita
{"title":"为重症监护病房的姑息关怀制定质量指标,并通过电子病历审查进行试点测试。","authors":"Yuta Tanaka, Kento Masukawa, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Akane Kato, Yuichiro Ishigami, Junko Tatsuno, Kaori Ito, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Mitsunori Miyashita","doi":"10.1186/s40560-023-00713-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) often require quality palliative care for relief from various types of suffering. To achieve quality palliative care, specific goals need to be identified, measured, and reported. The present study aimed to develop quality indicators (QIs) for palliative care in ICUs, based on a systematic review and modified Delphi method, and test their feasibility by reviewing electronic medical record (EMR) data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study was performed in two phases: the development of QIs using the modified Delphi method, and pilot-testing the quality of palliative care in ICUs based on EMR review. The pilot test included 262 patients admitted to the general or emergency ICU at a university hospital from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 28-item QI set for palliative care in ICUs was developed based on the consensus of 16 experts. The Delphi process resulted in low measurability ratings for two items: \"Assessment of the patient's psychological distress\" and \"Assessment of the patient's spiritual and cultural practices.\" However, these items were determined to be important for quality care from the perspective of holistic assessment of distress and were adopted in the final version of the QI set. While the pilot test results indicated the feasibility of the developed QIs, they suggested that the frequency of care performance varied, and certain aspects of palliative care in ICUs needed to be improved, namely (1) regular pain assessment, (2) identification of the patient's advance directive and advance care planning for treatment, (3) conducting an interdisciplinary family conference on palliative care, and (4) assessment of psychological distress of family members.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The QI set, developed using the modified Delphi method and tested using EMR data, provided a tool for assessing the quality of palliative care in ICUs. In the two ICUs considered in this study, aspects of the palliative care process with a low performance frequency were identified, and further national surveys were recommended. It is necessary to conduct ongoing surveys at more facilities to improve the quality of palliative care in ICUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10775577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of quality indicators for palliative care in intensive care units and pilot testing them via electronic medical record review.\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Tanaka, Kento Masukawa, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Akane Kato, Yuichiro Ishigami, Junko Tatsuno, Kaori Ito, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Mitsunori Miyashita\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40560-023-00713-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) often require quality palliative care for relief from various types of suffering. To achieve quality palliative care, specific goals need to be identified, measured, and reported. The present study aimed to develop quality indicators (QIs) for palliative care in ICUs, based on a systematic review and modified Delphi method, and test their feasibility by reviewing electronic medical record (EMR) data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study was performed in two phases: the development of QIs using the modified Delphi method, and pilot-testing the quality of palliative care in ICUs based on EMR review. The pilot test included 262 patients admitted to the general or emergency ICU at a university hospital from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 28-item QI set for palliative care in ICUs was developed based on the consensus of 16 experts. The Delphi process resulted in low measurability ratings for two items: \\\"Assessment of the patient's psychological distress\\\" and \\\"Assessment of the patient's spiritual and cultural practices.\\\" However, these items were determined to be important for quality care from the perspective of holistic assessment of distress and were adopted in the final version of the QI set. While the pilot test results indicated the feasibility of the developed QIs, they suggested that the frequency of care performance varied, and certain aspects of palliative care in ICUs needed to be improved, namely (1) regular pain assessment, (2) identification of the patient's advance directive and advance care planning for treatment, (3) conducting an interdisciplinary family conference on palliative care, and (4) assessment of psychological distress of family members.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The QI set, developed using the modified Delphi method and tested using EMR data, provided a tool for assessing the quality of palliative care in ICUs. In the two ICUs considered in this study, aspects of the palliative care process with a low performance frequency were identified, and further national surveys were recommended. It is necessary to conduct ongoing surveys at more facilities to improve the quality of palliative care in ICUs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10775577/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00713-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00713-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症监护病房(ICU)的病人通常需要高质量的姑息关怀来缓解各种痛苦。为实现优质姑息关怀,需要确定、衡量和报告具体目标。本研究旨在根据系统性回顾和改良德尔菲法制定 ICU 姑息关怀的质量指标(QIs),并通过审查电子病历(EMR)数据检验其可行性:本研究分两个阶段进行:使用改良德尔菲法制定 QIs,并根据电子病历审查对重症监护室姑息关怀的质量进行试点测试。试点测试包括2019年1月1日至2019年6月30日期间某大学附属医院普通或急诊重症监护室收治的262名患者:根据 16 位专家的共识,为重症监护室姑息关怀制定了一套 28 个项目的 QI。德尔菲过程导致两个项目的可测量性评级较低:"评估病人的心理痛苦 "和 "评估病人的精神和文化习俗"。不过,从全面评估痛苦的角度来看,这两个项目被认为对优质护理非常重要,因此在最终版本的 QI 套件中被采用。虽然试点测试结果表明了所开发的QIs的可行性,但它们也表明,护理表现的频率各不相同,重症监护病房姑息关怀的某些方面需要改进,即(1)定期疼痛评估;(2)识别患者的预嘱和治疗的预先护理计划;(3)开展关于姑息关怀的跨学科家庭会议;以及(4)评估家庭成员的心理痛苦:采用改良德尔菲法开发并使用 EMR 数据进行测试的 QI 套件为评估重症监护病房的姑息关怀质量提供了一种工具。在本研究中考虑的两家重症监护病房中,发现了姑息关怀流程中绩效频率较低的方面,建议进一步开展全国性调查。有必要在更多的机构开展持续调查,以提高重症监护病房的姑息关怀质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of quality indicators for palliative care in intensive care units and pilot testing them via electronic medical record review.

Background: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) often require quality palliative care for relief from various types of suffering. To achieve quality palliative care, specific goals need to be identified, measured, and reported. The present study aimed to develop quality indicators (QIs) for palliative care in ICUs, based on a systematic review and modified Delphi method, and test their feasibility by reviewing electronic medical record (EMR) data.

Methods: The current study was performed in two phases: the development of QIs using the modified Delphi method, and pilot-testing the quality of palliative care in ICUs based on EMR review. The pilot test included 262 patients admitted to the general or emergency ICU at a university hospital from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2019.

Results: A 28-item QI set for palliative care in ICUs was developed based on the consensus of 16 experts. The Delphi process resulted in low measurability ratings for two items: "Assessment of the patient's psychological distress" and "Assessment of the patient's spiritual and cultural practices." However, these items were determined to be important for quality care from the perspective of holistic assessment of distress and were adopted in the final version of the QI set. While the pilot test results indicated the feasibility of the developed QIs, they suggested that the frequency of care performance varied, and certain aspects of palliative care in ICUs needed to be improved, namely (1) regular pain assessment, (2) identification of the patient's advance directive and advance care planning for treatment, (3) conducting an interdisciplinary family conference on palliative care, and (4) assessment of psychological distress of family members.

Conclusions: The QI set, developed using the modified Delphi method and tested using EMR data, provided a tool for assessing the quality of palliative care in ICUs. In the two ICUs considered in this study, aspects of the palliative care process with a low performance frequency were identified, and further national surveys were recommended. It is necessary to conduct ongoing surveys at more facilities to improve the quality of palliative care in ICUs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes of patients with critical acute pulmonary embolism requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2. Increased national critical care demands were associated with a higher mortality of intubated COVID-19 patients in Japan: a retrospective observational study. Current status of bacteriophage therapy for severe bacterial infections. Height status matters for risk of mortality in critically ill children. Hemorrhages and risk factors in patients undergoing thromboprophylaxis in a respiratory critical care unit: a secondary data analysis of a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1