接受治疗者中的戊型肝炎病毒:一项观察性血清学和分子研究。

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Current drug safety Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2174/0115748863272272231122114732
João R Mesquita, Sérgio Santos-Silva, Nanci Ferreira, Antonio Rivero-Juarez, Guilherme Gonçalves, Maria São José Nascimento
{"title":"接受治疗者中的戊型肝炎病毒:一项观察性血清学和分子研究。","authors":"João R Mesquita, Sérgio Santos-Silva, Nanci Ferreira, Antonio Rivero-Juarez, Guilherme Gonçalves, Maria São José Nascimento","doi":"10.2174/0115748863272272231122114732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Heparin is derived from swine and has been suggested as a possible source of HEV. To study the potential risk of HEV infection associated with heparin treatment, two groups of individuals were compared. Sera from heparinized (N=93) and non-heparinized individuals (N=111) were tested for markers of acute HEV infection and anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An acute HEV case was defined by the presence of anti-HEV IgM and/or HEV RNA. From the 93 heparinized individuals, one was positive for IgM and IgG anti-HEV and two were positive for HEV RNA (for both ORF3 and ORF2), and there were a total of two (2.2%) cases of current or recent HEV infection. From the 111 non-heparinized individuals, three were positive for IgM anti-HEV, one was positive for both IgM and IgG anti-HEV, and none was positive for HEV RNA, and there were a total of three (2.7%) cases of current or recent HEV infection. The difference between HEV cases in the heparinized individuals and the non-heparinized individuals was not statistically significant (2.2% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.799).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concerning IgG anti-HEV, it was detected in 32 individuals from the heparinized group and in 18 from the non-heparinized control group. A statistically significant difference was observed in the presence of anti-HEV IgG in heparinized individuals and controls (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has not found any association between heparin treatment and acute HEV infection, but has shown the use of therapeutic heparin as a risk factor for IgG anti-HEV seropositivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hepatitis E Virus in Individuals Undergoing Heparin Therapy: An Observational Serological and Molecular Study.\",\"authors\":\"João R Mesquita, Sérgio Santos-Silva, Nanci Ferreira, Antonio Rivero-Juarez, Guilherme Gonçalves, Maria São José Nascimento\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115748863272272231122114732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Heparin is derived from swine and has been suggested as a possible source of HEV. To study the potential risk of HEV infection associated with heparin treatment, two groups of individuals were compared. Sera from heparinized (N=93) and non-heparinized individuals (N=111) were tested for markers of acute HEV infection and anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An acute HEV case was defined by the presence of anti-HEV IgM and/or HEV RNA. From the 93 heparinized individuals, one was positive for IgM and IgG anti-HEV and two were positive for HEV RNA (for both ORF3 and ORF2), and there were a total of two (2.2%) cases of current or recent HEV infection. From the 111 non-heparinized individuals, three were positive for IgM anti-HEV, one was positive for both IgM and IgG anti-HEV, and none was positive for HEV RNA, and there were a total of three (2.7%) cases of current or recent HEV infection. The difference between HEV cases in the heparinized individuals and the non-heparinized individuals was not statistically significant (2.2% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.799).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concerning IgG anti-HEV, it was detected in 32 individuals from the heparinized group and in 18 from the non-heparinized control group. A statistically significant difference was observed in the presence of anti-HEV IgG in heparinized individuals and controls (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has not found any association between heparin treatment and acute HEV infection, but has shown the use of therapeutic heparin as a risk factor for IgG anti-HEV seropositivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current drug safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current drug safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748863272272231122114732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748863272272231122114732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:肝素来自猪,被认为可能是 HEV 的来源。为了研究与肝素治疗相关的 HEV 感染潜在风险,我们对两组人进行了比较。对肝素治疗者(93 人)和非肝素治疗者(111 人)的血清进行了急性 HEV 感染标记物和抗 HEV IgG 血清流行率检测:急性 HEV 病例的定义是出现抗 HEV IgM 和/或 HEV RNA。在 93 名肝素感染者中,1 人的抗 HEV IgM 和 IgG 阳性,2 人的 HEV RNA 阳性(ORF3 和 ORF2),共有 2 人(2.2%)目前或近期感染 HEV。在 111 名未接受肝素治疗的人中,有 3 人的 IgM 抗 HEV 阳性,1 人的 IgM 和 IgG 抗 HEV 阳性,没有人的 HEV RNA 阳性,共有 3 例(2.7%)目前或近期感染 HEV 的病例。肝素注射者与非肝素注射者的 HEV 感染病例差异无统计学意义(2.2% 对 2.7%;P = 0.799):关于抗 HEV IgG,肝素化疗组的 32 人和非肝素化疗对照组的 18 人中都检测到了抗 HEV IgG。肝素化疗组和非肝素化疗对照组的抗 HEV IgG 存在统计学差异(p = 0.003):本研究未发现肝素治疗与急性 HEV 感染之间存在任何关联,但表明使用治疗性肝素是导致抗 HEV IgG 血清阳性的一个危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hepatitis E Virus in Individuals Undergoing Heparin Therapy: An Observational Serological and Molecular Study.

Introduction: Heparin is derived from swine and has been suggested as a possible source of HEV. To study the potential risk of HEV infection associated with heparin treatment, two groups of individuals were compared. Sera from heparinized (N=93) and non-heparinized individuals (N=111) were tested for markers of acute HEV infection and anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence.

Methods: An acute HEV case was defined by the presence of anti-HEV IgM and/or HEV RNA. From the 93 heparinized individuals, one was positive for IgM and IgG anti-HEV and two were positive for HEV RNA (for both ORF3 and ORF2), and there were a total of two (2.2%) cases of current or recent HEV infection. From the 111 non-heparinized individuals, three were positive for IgM anti-HEV, one was positive for both IgM and IgG anti-HEV, and none was positive for HEV RNA, and there were a total of three (2.7%) cases of current or recent HEV infection. The difference between HEV cases in the heparinized individuals and the non-heparinized individuals was not statistically significant (2.2% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.799).

Results: Concerning IgG anti-HEV, it was detected in 32 individuals from the heparinized group and in 18 from the non-heparinized control group. A statistically significant difference was observed in the presence of anti-HEV IgG in heparinized individuals and controls (p = 0.003).

Conclusion: This study has not found any association between heparin treatment and acute HEV infection, but has shown the use of therapeutic heparin as a risk factor for IgG anti-HEV seropositivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current drug safety
Current drug safety PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Current Drug Safety publishes frontier articles on all the latest advances on drug safety. The journal aims to publish the highest quality research articles, reviews and case reports in the field. Topics covered include: adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes, management of adverse effects, pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology of new and existing drugs, post-marketing surveillance. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug safety.
期刊最新文献
Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome with Multiple Drugs (Leflunomide and Cefuroxime): A Case Report. Possible Terbinafine and/or Itraconazole Induced Vasculitis - A Case Study. Long-term Safety Monitoring and Efficacy Status of Infliximab and its Biosimilars in Psoriasis Management. Parsonage-Turner Syndrome Following AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccination. Ciprofloxacin's Structure Causing Fluoride-Related Toxicity: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1