焦虑症治疗抵抗的定义:基于德尔菲法的共识指南。

IF 60.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY World Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1002/wps.21177
Katharina Domschke, Patrik D Seuling, Miriam A Schiele, Borwin Bandelow, Neeltje M Batelaan, Wicher A Bokma, Igor Branchi, Karl Broich, Julius Burkauskas, Simon J C Davies, Bernardo Dell'Osso, Harry Fagan, Naomi A Fineberg, Toshi A Furukawa, Stefan G Hofmann, Sean Hood, Nathan T M Huneke, Milan Latas, Nicky Lidbetter, Vasilios Masdrakis, R Hamish McAllister-Williams, Antonio E Nardi, Stefano Pallanti, Brenda W J H Penninx, Giampaolo Perna, Steve Pilling, Stefano Pini, Andreas Reif, Soraya Seedat, Gemma Simons, Shrikant Srivastava, Vesta Steibliene, Dan J Stein, Murray B Stein, Michael van Ameringen, Anton J L M van Balkom, Nic van der Wee, Peter Zwanzger, David S Baldwin
{"title":"焦虑症治疗抵抗的定义:基于德尔菲法的共识指南。","authors":"Katharina Domschke, Patrik D Seuling, Miriam A Schiele, Borwin Bandelow, Neeltje M Batelaan, Wicher A Bokma, Igor Branchi, Karl Broich, Julius Burkauskas, Simon J C Davies, Bernardo Dell'Osso, Harry Fagan, Naomi A Fineberg, Toshi A Furukawa, Stefan G Hofmann, Sean Hood, Nathan T M Huneke, Milan Latas, Nicky Lidbetter, Vasilios Masdrakis, R Hamish McAllister-Williams, Antonio E Nardi, Stefano Pallanti, Brenda W J H Penninx, Giampaolo Perna, Steve Pilling, Stefano Pini, Andreas Reif, Soraya Seedat, Gemma Simons, Shrikant Srivastava, Vesta Steibliene, Dan J Stein, Murray B Stein, Michael van Ameringen, Anton J L M van Balkom, Nic van der Wee, Peter Zwanzger, David S Baldwin","doi":"10.1002/wps.21177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety disorders are very prevalent and often persistent mental disorders, with a considerable rate of treatment resistance which requires regulatory clinical trials of innovative therapeutic interventions. However, an explicit definition of treatment-resistant anxiety disorders (TR-AD) informing such trials is currently lacking. We used a Delphi method-based consensus approach to provide internationally agreed, consistent and clinically useful operational criteria for TR-AD in adults. Following a summary of the current state of knowledge based on international guidelines and an available systematic review, a survey of free-text responses to a 29-item questionnaire on relevant aspects of TR-AD, and an online consensus meeting, a panel of 36 multidisciplinary international experts and stakeholders voted anonymously on written statements in three survey rounds. Consensus was defined as ≥75% of the panel agreeing with a statement. The panel agreed on a set of 14 recommendations for the definition of TR-AD, providing detailed operational criteria for resistance to pharmacological and/or psychotherapeutic treatment, as well as a potential staging model. The panel also evaluated further aspects regarding epidemiological subgroups, comorbidities and biographical factors, the terminology of TR-AD vs. \"difficult-to-treat\" anxiety disorders, preferences and attitudes of persons with these disorders, and future research directions. This Delphi method-based consensus on operational criteria for TR-AD is expected to serve as a systematic, consistent and practical clinical guideline to aid in designing future mechanistic studies and facilitate clinical trials for regulatory purposes. This effort could ultimately lead to the development of more effective evidence-based stepped-care treatment algorithms for patients with anxiety disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":49357,"journal":{"name":"World Psychiatry","volume":"23 1","pages":"113-123"},"PeriodicalIF":60.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The definition of treatment resistance in anxiety disorders: a Delphi method-based consensus guideline.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Domschke, Patrik D Seuling, Miriam A Schiele, Borwin Bandelow, Neeltje M Batelaan, Wicher A Bokma, Igor Branchi, Karl Broich, Julius Burkauskas, Simon J C Davies, Bernardo Dell'Osso, Harry Fagan, Naomi A Fineberg, Toshi A Furukawa, Stefan G Hofmann, Sean Hood, Nathan T M Huneke, Milan Latas, Nicky Lidbetter, Vasilios Masdrakis, R Hamish McAllister-Williams, Antonio E Nardi, Stefano Pallanti, Brenda W J H Penninx, Giampaolo Perna, Steve Pilling, Stefano Pini, Andreas Reif, Soraya Seedat, Gemma Simons, Shrikant Srivastava, Vesta Steibliene, Dan J Stein, Murray B Stein, Michael van Ameringen, Anton J L M van Balkom, Nic van der Wee, Peter Zwanzger, David S Baldwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wps.21177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anxiety disorders are very prevalent and often persistent mental disorders, with a considerable rate of treatment resistance which requires regulatory clinical trials of innovative therapeutic interventions. However, an explicit definition of treatment-resistant anxiety disorders (TR-AD) informing such trials is currently lacking. We used a Delphi method-based consensus approach to provide internationally agreed, consistent and clinically useful operational criteria for TR-AD in adults. Following a summary of the current state of knowledge based on international guidelines and an available systematic review, a survey of free-text responses to a 29-item questionnaire on relevant aspects of TR-AD, and an online consensus meeting, a panel of 36 multidisciplinary international experts and stakeholders voted anonymously on written statements in three survey rounds. Consensus was defined as ≥75% of the panel agreeing with a statement. The panel agreed on a set of 14 recommendations for the definition of TR-AD, providing detailed operational criteria for resistance to pharmacological and/or psychotherapeutic treatment, as well as a potential staging model. The panel also evaluated further aspects regarding epidemiological subgroups, comorbidities and biographical factors, the terminology of TR-AD vs. \\\"difficult-to-treat\\\" anxiety disorders, preferences and attitudes of persons with these disorders, and future research directions. This Delphi method-based consensus on operational criteria for TR-AD is expected to serve as a systematic, consistent and practical clinical guideline to aid in designing future mechanistic studies and facilitate clinical trials for regulatory purposes. This effort could ultimately lead to the development of more effective evidence-based stepped-care treatment algorithms for patients with anxiety disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"113-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":60.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785995/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21177\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

焦虑症是一种发病率很高的精神疾病,而且往往是一种顽固性疾病,具有相当高的耐药性,因此需要对创新性治疗干预措施进行规范性临床试验。然而,目前还缺乏一个明确的焦虑症耐药性(TR-AD)定义来为此类试验提供依据。我们采用基于德尔菲法的共识方法,为成人焦虑症(TR-AD)提供了国际公认的、一致的、对临床有用的操作标准。在对基于国际指南和现有系统综述的知识现状进行总结、对有关 TR-AD 相关方面的 29 项问卷的自由文本回复进行调查以及召开在线共识会议之后,由 36 位多学科国际专家和利益相关者组成的小组在三轮调查中对书面陈述进行了匿名投票。共识的定义是≥75%的专家小组成员同意某项声明。专家小组就 TR-AD 的定义达成了 14 项建议,为药物和/或心理治疗的耐药性提供了详细的操作标准,并提供了一个潜在的分期模型。专家组还进一步评估了流行病学亚群、合并症和传记因素、TR-AD 与 "难以治疗 "焦虑症的术语、焦虑症患者的偏好和态度以及未来研究方向等方面的问题。这一基于德尔菲法的 TR-AD 操作标准共识有望成为系统、一致和实用的临床指南,帮助设计未来的机理研究,并促进监管目的的临床试验。这项工作最终将为焦虑症患者制定更有效的循证阶梯式治疗算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The definition of treatment resistance in anxiety disorders: a Delphi method-based consensus guideline.

Anxiety disorders are very prevalent and often persistent mental disorders, with a considerable rate of treatment resistance which requires regulatory clinical trials of innovative therapeutic interventions. However, an explicit definition of treatment-resistant anxiety disorders (TR-AD) informing such trials is currently lacking. We used a Delphi method-based consensus approach to provide internationally agreed, consistent and clinically useful operational criteria for TR-AD in adults. Following a summary of the current state of knowledge based on international guidelines and an available systematic review, a survey of free-text responses to a 29-item questionnaire on relevant aspects of TR-AD, and an online consensus meeting, a panel of 36 multidisciplinary international experts and stakeholders voted anonymously on written statements in three survey rounds. Consensus was defined as ≥75% of the panel agreeing with a statement. The panel agreed on a set of 14 recommendations for the definition of TR-AD, providing detailed operational criteria for resistance to pharmacological and/or psychotherapeutic treatment, as well as a potential staging model. The panel also evaluated further aspects regarding epidemiological subgroups, comorbidities and biographical factors, the terminology of TR-AD vs. "difficult-to-treat" anxiety disorders, preferences and attitudes of persons with these disorders, and future research directions. This Delphi method-based consensus on operational criteria for TR-AD is expected to serve as a systematic, consistent and practical clinical guideline to aid in designing future mechanistic studies and facilitate clinical trials for regulatory purposes. This effort could ultimately lead to the development of more effective evidence-based stepped-care treatment algorithms for patients with anxiety disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Psychiatry
World Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
自引率
7.40%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: World Psychiatry is the official journal of the World Psychiatric Association. It is published in three issues per year. The journal is sent free of charge to psychiatrists whose names and addresses are provided by WPA member societies and sections. World Psychiatry is also freely accessible on Wiley Online Library and PubMed Central. The main aim of World Psychiatry is to disseminate information on significant clinical, service, and research developments in the mental health field. The journal aims to use a language that can be understood by the majority of mental health professionals worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Emotion regulation, scaffolding and psychiatry. Medication use and sickness absence from work in bipolar disorder: a nationwide register-based study. Modulating self-referential processing through meditation and psychedelics: is scientific investigation of self-transcendence clinically relevant? Phenomenology, delusions and justice. Philosophy of psychiatry as study of paradigm changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1