草本植物早到的优先效应:根系相互作用和非对称竞争的作用

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Processes Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1186/s13717-024-00483-y
Xiaohong Yan, Xiliang Li, Ke Jin
{"title":"草本植物早到的优先效应:根系相互作用和非对称竞争的作用","authors":"Xiaohong Yan, Xiliang Li, Ke Jin","doi":"10.1186/s13717-024-00483-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The priority effect of plant arrival is a key driver of community assembly and ecosystem succession during the restoration of degraded plant communities. However, the significance of the arrival order of different plant functional groups and their interactions with community assemblies remains unclear. Using a phytotron experiment with three fully crossed factors, we investigated the underlying mechanisms of priority effects and their relationships with the biomass and biodiversity effects in mixed plant communities by manipulating the order of arrival of species, isolation of roots, and removal of specific plants. The results showed that the strength and direction of priority effects were influenced by arrival order, root interactions, asymmetric competition among species, and their interactions. The identities of early and late-sown species also determined the magnitude of priority effects. The priority effects were stronger in grass-first (24.76%) and legume-first communities (24.48%) than in forb-first communities. The pot biomass of the different priority treatments was highest in grass-first (5.85 g), followed by legume-first (3.94 g) and forb-first (2.48 g). The order of arrival in the mixture significantly affected the net biodiversity effects (P < 0.001), which were driven by dominance effects. The community had lower overall biomass when forbs were sown first, whereas the species grown later had fewer costs with an increased overall net benefit for the resulting community. Our results emphasize that root interactions and asymmetric competition are vital determinants of order-specific priority effects in community assemblies. In addition, the importance of the priority effect of forbs sown first is related to community assembly, which may be a key determinant in successfully establishing a highly diverse community in the early stages of restoration. Species with weak competition should be considered in the early stage of community assembly. The rational use of the priority effect is conducive to improving the quality and efficiency of ecological restoration efforts.","PeriodicalId":11419,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Processes","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Priority effects of forbs arriving early: the role of root interaction and asymmetric competition\",\"authors\":\"Xiaohong Yan, Xiliang Li, Ke Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13717-024-00483-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The priority effect of plant arrival is a key driver of community assembly and ecosystem succession during the restoration of degraded plant communities. However, the significance of the arrival order of different plant functional groups and their interactions with community assemblies remains unclear. Using a phytotron experiment with three fully crossed factors, we investigated the underlying mechanisms of priority effects and their relationships with the biomass and biodiversity effects in mixed plant communities by manipulating the order of arrival of species, isolation of roots, and removal of specific plants. The results showed that the strength and direction of priority effects were influenced by arrival order, root interactions, asymmetric competition among species, and their interactions. The identities of early and late-sown species also determined the magnitude of priority effects. The priority effects were stronger in grass-first (24.76%) and legume-first communities (24.48%) than in forb-first communities. The pot biomass of the different priority treatments was highest in grass-first (5.85 g), followed by legume-first (3.94 g) and forb-first (2.48 g). The order of arrival in the mixture significantly affected the net biodiversity effects (P < 0.001), which were driven by dominance effects. The community had lower overall biomass when forbs were sown first, whereas the species grown later had fewer costs with an increased overall net benefit for the resulting community. Our results emphasize that root interactions and asymmetric competition are vital determinants of order-specific priority effects in community assemblies. In addition, the importance of the priority effect of forbs sown first is related to community assembly, which may be a key determinant in successfully establishing a highly diverse community in the early stages of restoration. Species with weak competition should be considered in the early stage of community assembly. The rational use of the priority effect is conducive to improving the quality and efficiency of ecological restoration efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Processes\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-024-00483-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-024-00483-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在退化植物群落恢复过程中,植物到达的优先效应是群落组合和生态系统演替的关键驱动因素。然而,不同植物功能群的到达顺序及其与群落组合的相互作用的意义仍不清楚。我们利用三个完全交叉因子的植物实验,通过操纵物种到达、根系隔离和移除特定植物的顺序,研究了优先效应的内在机制及其与混合植物群落生物量和生物多样性效应之间的关系。结果表明,优先效应的强度和方向受到达顺序、根系相互作用、物种间不对称竞争及其相互作用的影响。早播和晚播物种的特性也决定了优先效应的大小。先播种禾本科植物(24.76%)和先播种豆科植物(24.48%)的群落的优先效应强于先播种禁止植物的群落。不同优先处理的盆栽生物量以禾本科优先处理最高(5.85 克),其次是豆科优先处理(3.94 克)和禁止植物优先处理(2.48 克)。混合物中的到达顺序对净生物多样性效应有显著影响(P < 0.001),这主要是由优势效应驱动的。先播种草本植物时,群落的总体生物量较低,而后种植的物种成本较低,由此产生的群落总体净效益较高。我们的研究结果强调,根系相互作用和非对称竞争是群落组合中特定顺序优先效应的重要决定因素。此外,先播种草本植物的优先效应的重要性与群落组合有关,这可能是在恢复初期成功建立高度多样化群落的关键决定因素。在群落组合的早期阶段,应考虑竞争弱的物种。合理利用优先效应有利于提高生态恢复工作的质量和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Priority effects of forbs arriving early: the role of root interaction and asymmetric competition
The priority effect of plant arrival is a key driver of community assembly and ecosystem succession during the restoration of degraded plant communities. However, the significance of the arrival order of different plant functional groups and their interactions with community assemblies remains unclear. Using a phytotron experiment with three fully crossed factors, we investigated the underlying mechanisms of priority effects and their relationships with the biomass and biodiversity effects in mixed plant communities by manipulating the order of arrival of species, isolation of roots, and removal of specific plants. The results showed that the strength and direction of priority effects were influenced by arrival order, root interactions, asymmetric competition among species, and their interactions. The identities of early and late-sown species also determined the magnitude of priority effects. The priority effects were stronger in grass-first (24.76%) and legume-first communities (24.48%) than in forb-first communities. The pot biomass of the different priority treatments was highest in grass-first (5.85 g), followed by legume-first (3.94 g) and forb-first (2.48 g). The order of arrival in the mixture significantly affected the net biodiversity effects (P < 0.001), which were driven by dominance effects. The community had lower overall biomass when forbs were sown first, whereas the species grown later had fewer costs with an increased overall net benefit for the resulting community. Our results emphasize that root interactions and asymmetric competition are vital determinants of order-specific priority effects in community assemblies. In addition, the importance of the priority effect of forbs sown first is related to community assembly, which may be a key determinant in successfully establishing a highly diverse community in the early stages of restoration. Species with weak competition should be considered in the early stage of community assembly. The rational use of the priority effect is conducive to improving the quality and efficiency of ecological restoration efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Processes
Ecological Processes Environmental Science-Ecological Modeling
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecological Processes is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal devoted to quality publications in ecological studies with a focus on the underlying processes responsible for the dynamics and functions of ecological systems at multiple spatial and temporal scales. The journal welcomes manuscripts on techniques, approaches, concepts, models, reviews, syntheses, short communications and applied research for advancing our knowledge and capability toward sustainability of ecosystems and the environment. Integrations of ecological and socio-economic processes are strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Effects of warming on soil fungal community and its function in a temperate steppe Non-linear response of plant caloric value to N addition and mowing treatments in a meadow steppe Spatial patterns of causality in temperate silvopastoral systems: a perspective on nitrification stability in response to flooding Functional and phylogenetic structure of mammals along elevational gradients in the Central and East Himalayas Fine spatial scale assessment of structure and configuration of vegetation cover for northern bobwhites in grazed pastures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1