网上虐待:系统文献综述和未来研究议程

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION International Journal of Conflict Management Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1108/ijcma-09-2023-0188
Raiswa Saha, Sakshi Ahlawat, Umair Akram, Uttara Jangbahadur, Amol S. Dhaigude, Pooja Sharma, Sarika Kumar
{"title":"网上虐待:系统文献综述和未来研究议程","authors":"Raiswa Saha, Sakshi Ahlawat, Umair Akram, Uttara Jangbahadur, Amol S. Dhaigude, Pooja Sharma, Sarika Kumar","doi":"10.1108/ijcma-09-2023-0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The study aims to examine the conceptualization of online abuse (OA) and identifies theories, countries of research, top-cited articles, methodologies, antecedents, mediators, outcomes and moderators of OA and future research opportunities. Two research questions are addressed. How have the past studies on OA progressed regarding theories, context, characteristics and methodology? What future research opportunities can be done in this area?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study systematically reviews, synthesizes and integrates OA literature using the well-recommended preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) rules. The literature on OA was synthesized based on the Theory–Context–Characteristics–Methodologies (TCCM) framework given by Paul and Rosado-Serrano.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Through an examination of TCCM used in OA research, the review presents an all-inclusive and up-to-date overview of the research in this arena and sets a future research agenda to spur scholarly research. This systematic literature review has analyzed top-quality sample papers, published in the past decade. As a result, it contributes to a better understanding of this relationship by analyzing the different types of use and the value added to the shopping experience.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study provides groundwork for researchers and promotes a deeper understanding of OA.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict Management","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online abuse: a systematic literature review and future research agenda\",\"authors\":\"Raiswa Saha, Sakshi Ahlawat, Umair Akram, Uttara Jangbahadur, Amol S. Dhaigude, Pooja Sharma, Sarika Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijcma-09-2023-0188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The study aims to examine the conceptualization of online abuse (OA) and identifies theories, countries of research, top-cited articles, methodologies, antecedents, mediators, outcomes and moderators of OA and future research opportunities. Two research questions are addressed. How have the past studies on OA progressed regarding theories, context, characteristics and methodology? What future research opportunities can be done in this area?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This study systematically reviews, synthesizes and integrates OA literature using the well-recommended preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) rules. The literature on OA was synthesized based on the Theory–Context–Characteristics–Methodologies (TCCM) framework given by Paul and Rosado-Serrano.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Through an examination of TCCM used in OA research, the review presents an all-inclusive and up-to-date overview of the research in this arena and sets a future research agenda to spur scholarly research. This systematic literature review has analyzed top-quality sample papers, published in the past decade. As a result, it contributes to a better understanding of this relationship by analyzing the different types of use and the value added to the shopping experience.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study provides groundwork for researchers and promotes a deeper understanding of OA.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Conflict Management\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Conflict Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-09-2023-0188\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-09-2023-0188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:本研究旨在考察网络侵权(OA)的概念化,并确定 OA 的理论、研究国家、高引用率文章、方法、前因、中介、结果和调节因素以及未来的研究机会。本研究探讨了两个研究问题。在理论、背景、特征和方法论方面,过去关于开放式获取的研究进展如何?设计/方法/方法本研究采用广受推崇的系统性综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)规则,对有关 OA 的文献进行了系统性综述、归纳和整合。研究结果通过对 OA 研究中使用的 TCCM 进行审查,本综述对该领域的研究进行了包罗万象的最新概述,并制定了未来的研究议程,以促进学术研究。这篇系统的文献综述分析了过去十年中发表的高质量论文样本。因此,它通过分析不同类型的使用和购物体验的附加值,有助于更好地理解这种关系。原创性/价值本研究为研究人员提供了基础工作,促进了对 OA 的深入理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Online abuse: a systematic literature review and future research agenda

Purpose

The study aims to examine the conceptualization of online abuse (OA) and identifies theories, countries of research, top-cited articles, methodologies, antecedents, mediators, outcomes and moderators of OA and future research opportunities. Two research questions are addressed. How have the past studies on OA progressed regarding theories, context, characteristics and methodology? What future research opportunities can be done in this area?

Design/methodology/approach

This study systematically reviews, synthesizes and integrates OA literature using the well-recommended preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) rules. The literature on OA was synthesized based on the Theory–Context–Characteristics–Methodologies (TCCM) framework given by Paul and Rosado-Serrano.

Findings

Through an examination of TCCM used in OA research, the review presents an all-inclusive and up-to-date overview of the research in this arena and sets a future research agenda to spur scholarly research. This systematic literature review has analyzed top-quality sample papers, published in the past decade. As a result, it contributes to a better understanding of this relationship by analyzing the different types of use and the value added to the shopping experience.

Originality/value

This study provides groundwork for researchers and promotes a deeper understanding of OA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Conflict management 101: how emotional intelligence can make or break a manager The relationship between management vs nonmanagement status and women employees’ dissent expression in US organizations Social strife at work: unravelling the link between workplace relationship conflict and employee ostracism behavior Does the conflict between work and family hinder thriving? Role of depersonalization and intrinsic motivation Workplace bullying and employee silence: the role of affect-based trust and climate for conflict management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1