利用在线治疗重新审视饮酒与抑制之间的关联。

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicothema Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.7334/psicothema2022.516
Alexandra Anderson, Emily Giddens, Jeggan Tiego, Dan Lubman, Antonio Verdejo-Garcia
{"title":"利用在线治疗重新审视饮酒与抑制之间的关联。","authors":"Alexandra Anderson, Emily Giddens, Jeggan Tiego, Dan Lubman, Antonio Verdejo-Garcia","doi":"10.7334/psicothema2022.516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive disinhibition underpins alcohol and drug use problems. Although higher-risk substance use is consistently associated with poorer disinhibition, current findings may be limited by narrow recruitment methods, which over-represent individuals engaged in traditional treatment services with more severe presentations. We embedded a novel gamified disinhibition task (the Cognitive Impulsivity Suite; CIS) in a national online addiction support service ( https://www.counsellingonline.org.au/ ).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants aged 18 to 64 ( N = 137; 109 women) completed the Alcohol-Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) along with the CIS, which measures three aspects of disinhibition (Attentional Control, Information-Sampling, and Feedback Monitoring/Shifting). The majority of the sample comprised people with alcohol use, and AUDIT scores were differentiated into ‘higher-risk’ or ‘lower-risk’ groups using latent-class analysis. These classes were then regressed against CIS performance measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to lower-risk, higher-risk alcohol use was associated with poorer attentional control and feedback monitoring/shifting. While higher-risk alcohol use was associated with slower information accumulation, this was only observed for older adults, who appeared to compensate with a more conservative response criterion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results reveal novel relationships between higher-risk alcohol use and specific aspects of disinhibition in participants who sought online addiction help services.</p>","PeriodicalId":48179,"journal":{"name":"Psicothema","volume":"36 1","pages":"15-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging Online Treatment to Re-examine the Association Between Alcohol Use and Disinhibition.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Anderson, Emily Giddens, Jeggan Tiego, Dan Lubman, Antonio Verdejo-Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.7334/psicothema2022.516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive disinhibition underpins alcohol and drug use problems. Although higher-risk substance use is consistently associated with poorer disinhibition, current findings may be limited by narrow recruitment methods, which over-represent individuals engaged in traditional treatment services with more severe presentations. We embedded a novel gamified disinhibition task (the Cognitive Impulsivity Suite; CIS) in a national online addiction support service ( https://www.counsellingonline.org.au/ ).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants aged 18 to 64 ( N = 137; 109 women) completed the Alcohol-Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) along with the CIS, which measures three aspects of disinhibition (Attentional Control, Information-Sampling, and Feedback Monitoring/Shifting). The majority of the sample comprised people with alcohol use, and AUDIT scores were differentiated into ‘higher-risk’ or ‘lower-risk’ groups using latent-class analysis. These classes were then regressed against CIS performance measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to lower-risk, higher-risk alcohol use was associated with poorer attentional control and feedback monitoring/shifting. While higher-risk alcohol use was associated with slower information accumulation, this was only observed for older adults, who appeared to compensate with a more conservative response criterion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results reveal novel relationships between higher-risk alcohol use and specific aspects of disinhibition in participants who sought online addiction help services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicothema\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"15-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicothema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2022.516\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicothema","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2022.516","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:认知抑制是酗酒和吸毒问题的基础。虽然高风险药物使用一直与较差的抑制能力有关,但目前的研究结果可能受到狭隘的招募方法的限制,因为这种方法过多地代表了接受传统治疗服务的、表现较严重的个体。我们在全国在线成瘾支持服务(https://www.counsellingonline.org.au/ )中嵌入了一个新颖的游戏化抑制任务(认知冲动套件;CIS):18至64岁的参与者(137人;109名女性)在完成酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)和药物使用障碍识别测试(DUDIT)的同时,还完成了CIS,CIS测量抑制的三个方面(注意力控制、信息采样和反馈监控/转移)。样本中的大多数人都曾酗酒,AUDIT 分数通过潜类分析被分为高风险组和低风险组。然后将这些组别与 CIS 性能指标进行回归分析:结果:与低风险相比,高风险饮酒者的注意力控制和反馈监控/转移能力较差。虽然较高风险的饮酒与较慢的信息积累有关,但这只出现在老年人身上,他们似乎用更保守的反应标准来弥补:我们的研究结果揭示了在寻求在线成瘾帮助服务的参与者中,高风险饮酒与抑制的特定方面之间的新关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leveraging Online Treatment to Re-examine the Association Between Alcohol Use and Disinhibition.

Background: Cognitive disinhibition underpins alcohol and drug use problems. Although higher-risk substance use is consistently associated with poorer disinhibition, current findings may be limited by narrow recruitment methods, which over-represent individuals engaged in traditional treatment services with more severe presentations. We embedded a novel gamified disinhibition task (the Cognitive Impulsivity Suite; CIS) in a national online addiction support service ( https://www.counsellingonline.org.au/ ).

Method: Participants aged 18 to 64 ( N = 137; 109 women) completed the Alcohol-Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) along with the CIS, which measures three aspects of disinhibition (Attentional Control, Information-Sampling, and Feedback Monitoring/Shifting). The majority of the sample comprised people with alcohol use, and AUDIT scores were differentiated into ‘higher-risk’ or ‘lower-risk’ groups using latent-class analysis. These classes were then regressed against CIS performance measures.

Results: Compared to lower-risk, higher-risk alcohol use was associated with poorer attentional control and feedback monitoring/shifting. While higher-risk alcohol use was associated with slower information accumulation, this was only observed for older adults, who appeared to compensate with a more conservative response criterion.

Conclusions: Our results reveal novel relationships between higher-risk alcohol use and specific aspects of disinhibition in participants who sought online addiction help services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psicothema
Psicothema PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: La revista Psicothema fue fundada en Asturias en 1989 y está editada conjuntamente por la Facultad y el Departamento de Psicología de la Universidad de Oviedo y el Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias. Publica cuatro números al año. Se admiten trabajos tanto de investigación básica como aplicada, pertenecientes a cualquier ámbito de la Psicología, que previamente a su publicación son evaluados anónimamente por revisores externos. Psicothema está incluida en las bases de datos nacionales e internacionales más relevantes, entre las que cabe destacar Psychological Abstracts, Current Contents y MEDLINE/Index Medicus, entre otras. Además, figura en las listas de Factor de Impacto del Journal Citation Reports. Psicothema es una revista abierta a cualquier enfoque u orientación psicológica que venga avalada por la fuerza de los datos y los argumentos, y en la que encuentran acomodo todos los autores que sean capaces de convencer a los revisores de que sus manuscritos tienen la calidad para ser publicados. Psicothema es una revista de acceso abierto lo que significa que todo el contenido está a disposición de cualquier usuario o institución sin cargo alguno. Los usuarios pueden leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar, o realizar enlaces a los textos completos de esta revista sin pedir permiso previo al editor o al autor, siempre y cuando la fuente original sea referenciada. Para acervos y repositorios, se prefiere que la cobertura se realice mediante enlaces a la propia web de Psicothema. Nos parece que una apuesta decidida por la calidad es el mejor modo de servir a nuestros lectores, cuyas sugerencias siempre serán bienvenidas.
期刊最新文献
Facing Fear and Embracing Safety: Validation of the COVID-19 Psychosocial Scales in Essential Frontline Workers During the Pandemic. Giftedness and Family Well-being: The Role of Emotional Intelligence, Perceived Social Support and Stress. Nighttime Fears and Coping Responses in School-Aged Children: A Latent Profile Analysis. Online Gendered Violence Victimization Among Adults: Prevalence, Predictors and Psychological Outcomes. Psychometric Properties of the Online Version of the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7): A Longitudinal Study in Pregnant and Postpartum Spanish Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1