从知识的深度和广度到技术能力:企业知识资本的内部之旅

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS R&D Management Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1111/radm.12669
Ali Esfandyarpour, Mohammad Reza Arasti, Mohammad Saleh Farazi, Iman Miremadi
{"title":"从知识的深度和广度到技术能力:企业知识资本的内部之旅","authors":"Ali Esfandyarpour, Mohammad Reza Arasti, Mohammad Saleh Farazi, Iman Miremadi","doi":"10.1111/radm.12669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current knowledge-intensive economy, a firm's intellectual capital refers to its idiosyncratic internal and external knowledge-related assets. While technological knowledge is a major constituent of intellectual capital, past research has often equated it with technological capability. However, technological capability includes not only codified knowledge, but also tacit know-how that is not captured by formal intellectual property. We argue that while a firm's patents might serve as a proxy for measuring its base of technological knowledge, they are not a good proxy for a firm's technological capabilities. Therefore, we offer a novel approach based on a machine learning technique to capture a biopharmaceutical firm's technological capabilities using the clinical trials that it carries out. Picturing a hypothetical journey where firms transform and exploit technological knowledge to move towards building technological capabilities, we address a research gap on the link between a firm's depth and breadth of technological knowledge on the one hand, and its technology diversity on the other. Analyzing a sample of 204 biopharma firms from 2006 to 2018, we find a positive relationship between the breadth of technological knowledge and technology diversity in a firm. In contrast, the relationship between the depth of technological knowledge and technology diversity is negative. We also find that in the presence of product/market diversification, the positive relationship between the breadth of technological knowledge and technology diversity is stronger. Implications for research and practice are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From depth and breadth of knowledge to technological capability: a journey inside a firm's intellectual capital\",\"authors\":\"Ali Esfandyarpour, Mohammad Reza Arasti, Mohammad Saleh Farazi, Iman Miremadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/radm.12669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the current knowledge-intensive economy, a firm's intellectual capital refers to its idiosyncratic internal and external knowledge-related assets. While technological knowledge is a major constituent of intellectual capital, past research has often equated it with technological capability. However, technological capability includes not only codified knowledge, but also tacit know-how that is not captured by formal intellectual property. We argue that while a firm's patents might serve as a proxy for measuring its base of technological knowledge, they are not a good proxy for a firm's technological capabilities. Therefore, we offer a novel approach based on a machine learning technique to capture a biopharmaceutical firm's technological capabilities using the clinical trials that it carries out. Picturing a hypothetical journey where firms transform and exploit technological knowledge to move towards building technological capabilities, we address a research gap on the link between a firm's depth and breadth of technological knowledge on the one hand, and its technology diversity on the other. Analyzing a sample of 204 biopharma firms from 2006 to 2018, we find a positive relationship between the breadth of technological knowledge and technology diversity in a firm. In contrast, the relationship between the depth of technological knowledge and technology diversity is negative. We also find that in the presence of product/market diversification, the positive relationship between the breadth of technological knowledge and technology diversity is stronger. Implications for research and practice are also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"R&D Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"R&D Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12669\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"R&D Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当前的知识密集型经济中,企业的知识资本指的是企业内部和外部与知识相关的特殊资产。虽然技术知识是知识资本的主要组成部分,但以往的研究往往将其等同于技术能力。然而,技术能力不仅包括成文的知识,还包括正式知识产权所不具备的隐性知识。我们认为,虽然企业的专利可以作为衡量其技术知识基础的代表,但并不能很好地代表企业的技术能力。因此,我们提供了一种基于机器学习技术的新方法,利用生物制药公司开展的临床试验来捕捉其技术能力。我们描绘了一个企业转化和利用技术知识以建立技术能力的假想旅程,解决了企业技术知识的深度和广度与技术多样性之间联系的研究空白。通过分析 2006 至 2018 年间 204 家生物制药企业的样本,我们发现企业的技术知识广度与技术多样性之间存在正相关关系。相比之下,技术知识深度与技术多样性之间的关系为负。我们还发现,在产品/市场多样化的情况下,技术知识广度与技术多样性之间的正相关关系更强。我们还讨论了研究和实践的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From depth and breadth of knowledge to technological capability: a journey inside a firm's intellectual capital
In the current knowledge-intensive economy, a firm's intellectual capital refers to its idiosyncratic internal and external knowledge-related assets. While technological knowledge is a major constituent of intellectual capital, past research has often equated it with technological capability. However, technological capability includes not only codified knowledge, but also tacit know-how that is not captured by formal intellectual property. We argue that while a firm's patents might serve as a proxy for measuring its base of technological knowledge, they are not a good proxy for a firm's technological capabilities. Therefore, we offer a novel approach based on a machine learning technique to capture a biopharmaceutical firm's technological capabilities using the clinical trials that it carries out. Picturing a hypothetical journey where firms transform and exploit technological knowledge to move towards building technological capabilities, we address a research gap on the link between a firm's depth and breadth of technological knowledge on the one hand, and its technology diversity on the other. Analyzing a sample of 204 biopharma firms from 2006 to 2018, we find a positive relationship between the breadth of technological knowledge and technology diversity in a firm. In contrast, the relationship between the depth of technological knowledge and technology diversity is negative. We also find that in the presence of product/market diversification, the positive relationship between the breadth of technological knowledge and technology diversity is stronger. Implications for research and practice are also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
R&D Management
R&D Management Multiple-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: R&D Management journal publishes articles which address the interests of both practising managers and academic researchers in research and development and innovation management. Covering the full range of topics in research, development, design and innovation, and related strategic and human resource issues - from exploratory science to commercial exploitation - articles also examine social, economic and environmental implications.
期刊最新文献
Roles of big data analytics and organizational culture in developing innovation capabilities: a hybrid PLS‐fsQCA approach Research, patents, and IPO valuation under the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 A Research Agenda for Workplace Innovation: The Challenge of Disruptive Transitions. Edited by Peter R. A.Oeij, StevenDhondt, Adela J.McMurray, Edgar Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2023, 978‐1‐80088‐193‐8, hardback, £115.49, pp. 304. The relationship between digital technologies and the circular economy: a systematic literature review and a research agenda Evolutionary Ideas: Unlocking Ancient Innovation to Solve Tomorrow's Challenges. By SamTatam, Harriman House Publishing: Hampshire, 2022, ISBN 978‐0‐85719‐787‐0, paperback, £9.99, pp. 240.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1