可撤销的婚姻

IF 0.6 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Ecclesiastical Law Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1017/s0956618x2300073x
Nicholas Mostyn
{"title":"可撤销的婚姻","authors":"Nicholas Mostyn","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x2300073x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article critiques the decision of the Court of Appeal in <jats:italic>Re SA (Declaration of Non-Recognition of Marriage)</jats:italic> [2023] EWCA Civ 1003. In <jats:italic>Re SA</jats:italic> the Court of Appeal held that: (1) by operation of section 16 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a voidable marriage is not void at its inception and is therefore not caught by section 58(5)(a) of the Family Law Act 1986, and (2) the effect of section 16 of the 1973 Act is that a voidable marriage starts off fully valid but only on making a decree absolute of nullity becomes invalid. This article contends that the approach adopted by the Court of Appeal in <jats:italic>SA</jats:italic> is conceptually challenging, based on a misreading of the statutory language, and is directly contrary to long-established and powerful authorities.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voidable marriages\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Mostyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0956618x2300073x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article critiques the decision of the Court of Appeal in <jats:italic>Re SA (Declaration of Non-Recognition of Marriage)</jats:italic> [2023] EWCA Civ 1003. In <jats:italic>Re SA</jats:italic> the Court of Appeal held that: (1) by operation of section 16 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a voidable marriage is not void at its inception and is therefore not caught by section 58(5)(a) of the Family Law Act 1986, and (2) the effect of section 16 of the 1973 Act is that a voidable marriage starts off fully valid but only on making a decree absolute of nullity becomes invalid. This article contends that the approach adopted by the Court of Appeal in <jats:italic>SA</jats:italic> is conceptually challenging, based on a misreading of the statutory language, and is directly contrary to long-established and powerful authorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecclesiastical Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecclesiastical Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x2300073x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x2300073x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对上诉法院在 Re SA (Declaration of Non-Recognition of Marriage) [2023] EWCA Civ 1003 一案中的判决进行了评论。在 Re SA 一案中,上诉法院认为(1) 根据《1973 年婚姻诉讼法》第 16 条的规定,可撤销的婚姻在开始时并非无效,因此不受《1986 年家庭法》第 58(5)(a)条的约束;以及 (2) 《1973 年婚姻诉讼法》第 16 条的效果是,可撤销的婚姻在开始时完全有效,但只有在作出无效的绝对判决时才会无效。本文认为,南澳大利亚州上诉法院采用的方法在概念上具有挑战性,其依据是对法律语言的误读,并且直接违背了长期以来确立的有力权威。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Voidable marriages
This article critiques the decision of the Court of Appeal in Re SA (Declaration of Non-Recognition of Marriage) [2023] EWCA Civ 1003. In Re SA the Court of Appeal held that: (1) by operation of section 16 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a voidable marriage is not void at its inception and is therefore not caught by section 58(5)(a) of the Family Law Act 1986, and (2) the effect of section 16 of the 1973 Act is that a voidable marriage starts off fully valid but only on making a decree absolute of nullity becomes invalid. This article contends that the approach adopted by the Court of Appeal in SA is conceptually challenging, based on a misreading of the statutory language, and is directly contrary to long-established and powerful authorities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
40.00%
发文量
75
期刊最新文献
When a doctrine is not a doctrine: understating the intersection of civil and canon law and the ‘doctrine’ of marriage in the Anglican Church of Australia Re Holy Trinity and St Jude, Halifax In defence of the Chancellor: a personal perspective Re St Thomas the Apostle, Killinghall Re St Anselm's Church, Kennington Cross
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1