阿斯顿-坎特罗诉沃尔班克:二十年回顾

IF 0.6 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Ecclesiastical Law Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1017/s0956618x2300056x
Mark Hill
{"title":"阿斯顿-坎特罗诉沃尔班克:二十年回顾","authors":"Mark Hill","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x2300056x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To mark the passing of two decades since the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords handed down their judgment in the appeal of <jats:italic>Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank</jats:italic> this article considers the enduring impact of the decision in terms of the constitutional position of the Church of England as a national church and analyses the public and private functions which it undertakes. In the altered landscape of the new Carolean era, with a decline in church attendance and a rise in secularism, it examines the reasoning of the five separate opinions delivered by the Law Lords and evaluates in retrospect various of the issues raised.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aston Cantlow v Wallbank: a twenty-year retrospective\",\"authors\":\"Mark Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0956618x2300056x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To mark the passing of two decades since the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords handed down their judgment in the appeal of <jats:italic>Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank</jats:italic> this article considers the enduring impact of the decision in terms of the constitutional position of the Church of England as a national church and analyses the public and private functions which it undertakes. In the altered landscape of the new Carolean era, with a decline in church attendance and a rise in secularism, it examines the reasoning of the five separate opinions delivered by the Law Lords and evaluates in retrospect various of the issues raised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecclesiastical Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecclesiastical Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x2300056x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x2300056x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为纪念上议院司法委员会对 Aston Cantlow 和 Wilmcote 与 Billesley 教区教会理事会诉 Wallbank 一案的上诉做出判决二十年,本文从英格兰教会作为国家教会的宪法地位的角度,探讨了该判决的持久影响,并分析了英格兰教会承担的公共和私人职能。在教会出席率下降、世俗主义兴起的新卡罗莱时代,该文探讨了上议院五项独立意见的推理,并对提出的各种问题进行了回顾性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aston Cantlow v Wallbank: a twenty-year retrospective
To mark the passing of two decades since the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords handed down their judgment in the appeal of Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank this article considers the enduring impact of the decision in terms of the constitutional position of the Church of England as a national church and analyses the public and private functions which it undertakes. In the altered landscape of the new Carolean era, with a decline in church attendance and a rise in secularism, it examines the reasoning of the five separate opinions delivered by the Law Lords and evaluates in retrospect various of the issues raised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
40.00%
发文量
75
期刊最新文献
When a doctrine is not a doctrine: understating the intersection of civil and canon law and the ‘doctrine’ of marriage in the Anglican Church of Australia Re Holy Trinity and St Jude, Halifax In defence of the Chancellor: a personal perspective Re St Thomas the Apostle, Killinghall Re St Anselm's Church, Kennington Cross
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1