哈布斯堡君主制末期斯洛文尼亚的希望与计划

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Austrian History Yearbook Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1017/s0067237823000899
Igor Ivašković
{"title":"哈布斯堡君主制末期斯洛文尼亚的希望与计划","authors":"Igor Ivašković","doi":"10.1017/s0067237823000899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article analyzes Slovenian perspectives on the possible formations of a state of South Slavs from the final stages of World War I until when the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats, and Slovenians (SCS) was established in 1918. In this period, the most influential Slovenian People's Party (SLS) gradually abandoned the concept of the May Declaration and accepted the idea of unification with Serbia. Despite Slovenian parties seeming to be in harmony on this issue, significant ideological differences separated them, as reflected in the geopolitical parameters of imagined Yugoslav state ideas they envisioned. Further, dissidents from the main parties also developed alternative visions of their own. This article looks at a few of the most prominent alternatives, while determining what distinguishes them from the requirements of the May Declaration, and examines the crucial factors in Slovenians’ decision to join the state of South Slavs with Serbia and to be outside the Habsburg monarchy.","PeriodicalId":54006,"journal":{"name":"Austrian History Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slovenian Hopes and Plans in the Last Days of the Habsburg Monarchy\",\"authors\":\"Igor Ivašković\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0067237823000899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The article analyzes Slovenian perspectives on the possible formations of a state of South Slavs from the final stages of World War I until when the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats, and Slovenians (SCS) was established in 1918. In this period, the most influential Slovenian People's Party (SLS) gradually abandoned the concept of the May Declaration and accepted the idea of unification with Serbia. Despite Slovenian parties seeming to be in harmony on this issue, significant ideological differences separated them, as reflected in the geopolitical parameters of imagined Yugoslav state ideas they envisioned. Further, dissidents from the main parties also developed alternative visions of their own. This article looks at a few of the most prominent alternatives, while determining what distinguishes them from the requirements of the May Declaration, and examines the crucial factors in Slovenians’ decision to join the state of South Slavs with Serbia and to be outside the Habsburg monarchy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austrian History Yearbook\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austrian History Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0067237823000899\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austrian History Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0067237823000899","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章分析了从第一次世界大战最后阶段到 1918 年塞尔维亚人、克罗地亚人和斯洛文尼亚人王国(SCS)建立之前,斯洛文尼亚人对可能组建南斯拉夫国家的看法。在此期间,最有影响力的斯洛文尼亚人民党逐渐放弃了《五月宣言》的理念,接受了与塞尔维亚统一的想法。尽管斯洛文尼亚各政党在这一问题上看似和谐一致,但意识形态上的重大分歧却将它们分隔开来,这反映在它们所设想的南斯拉夫国家构想的地缘政治参数上。此外,来自主要政党的持不同政见者也提出了自己的另类构想。本文探讨了其中几个最突出的替代方案,同时确定了它们与《五月宣言》要求的不同之处,并研究了斯洛文尼亚人决定加入塞尔维亚南斯拉夫国家并脱离哈布斯堡君主制的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Slovenian Hopes and Plans in the Last Days of the Habsburg Monarchy
The article analyzes Slovenian perspectives on the possible formations of a state of South Slavs from the final stages of World War I until when the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats, and Slovenians (SCS) was established in 1918. In this period, the most influential Slovenian People's Party (SLS) gradually abandoned the concept of the May Declaration and accepted the idea of unification with Serbia. Despite Slovenian parties seeming to be in harmony on this issue, significant ideological differences separated them, as reflected in the geopolitical parameters of imagined Yugoslav state ideas they envisioned. Further, dissidents from the main parties also developed alternative visions of their own. This article looks at a few of the most prominent alternatives, while determining what distinguishes them from the requirements of the May Declaration, and examines the crucial factors in Slovenians’ decision to join the state of South Slavs with Serbia and to be outside the Habsburg monarchy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Carmen Fracchia. ‘Black but Human’: Slavery and Visual Arts in Hapsburg Spain, 1480–1700 Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. Pp. XIII+232. Suzanne Sutherland. The Rise of the Military Entrepreneur: War, Diplomacy, and Knowledge in Habsburg Europe Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2022. Pp. 276. Gendering Late Medieval Habsburg Dynastic Politics: Maximilian I and His Social Networks Matthias B. Lehmann The Baron: Maurice de Hirsch and the Jewish Nineteenth Century Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2022. Pp. 380. Enlightened and Counter-Revolutionary: Revisiting the Origins of Galician Ruthenian Nation-Building
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1