泰国农村大学 WIE 学生语境大学技能学习与职场认可技能测试工具的开发与验证

Jetnipit Kunchai
{"title":"泰国农村大学 WIE 学生语境大学技能学习与职场认可技能测试工具的开发与验证","authors":"Jetnipit Kunchai","doi":"10.5539/hes.v14n1p54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A questionnaire for measuring Context University Skills and Workplace-Recognized Skills (LCUS-WRS) requires a validated and reliable instrument. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire to measure learning of context university skills and workplace-recognized skills, in order to carry out an advanced psychometric properties analysis of Work-Integrated Education (WIE) students and the skills of LCUS-WRS, including internal and external reliability. Methods: We conducted multi-stage random sampling, with a sample consisting of 728 students WIE from 20 rural colleges in Thailand. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on a subset of the sample (n = 279), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted on another subset (n = 449), both in different subgroups. Additionally, the researcher analyzed the internal consistency and temporal reliability of the scale in the instrument. \n \nResults: Using exploratory factor analysis with 39 items 6 factors and accounted for 55.881% of variance was identified of the variance for the CFA model. The model achieved a goodness-of-fit of chi-square (c2 ) = 582.907, df = 308, p = .000, c2 /df = 1.90, GFI = .979, AGFI = .985, RMSEA = .030, SRMR = .030 \n \nConclusion: LCUS-WRS scale has solid construct of validity and excellent internal consistency which to analyze psychometric properties It has optimum temporal reliability. Therefore, the indicated that the dimensions of measuring of LCUS-WRS guaranteed its use in higher education institutions.","PeriodicalId":504897,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure the Learning of Context University Skills and Workplace-recognized Skills Test among Students WIE in Rural College Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Jetnipit Kunchai\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/hes.v14n1p54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A questionnaire for measuring Context University Skills and Workplace-Recognized Skills (LCUS-WRS) requires a validated and reliable instrument. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire to measure learning of context university skills and workplace-recognized skills, in order to carry out an advanced psychometric properties analysis of Work-Integrated Education (WIE) students and the skills of LCUS-WRS, including internal and external reliability. Methods: We conducted multi-stage random sampling, with a sample consisting of 728 students WIE from 20 rural colleges in Thailand. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on a subset of the sample (n = 279), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted on another subset (n = 449), both in different subgroups. Additionally, the researcher analyzed the internal consistency and temporal reliability of the scale in the instrument. \\n \\nResults: Using exploratory factor analysis with 39 items 6 factors and accounted for 55.881% of variance was identified of the variance for the CFA model. The model achieved a goodness-of-fit of chi-square (c2 ) = 582.907, df = 308, p = .000, c2 /df = 1.90, GFI = .979, AGFI = .985, RMSEA = .030, SRMR = .030 \\n \\nConclusion: LCUS-WRS scale has solid construct of validity and excellent internal consistency which to analyze psychometric properties It has optimum temporal reliability. Therefore, the indicated that the dimensions of measuring of LCUS-WRS guaranteed its use in higher education institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Higher Education Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Higher Education Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v14n1p54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v14n1p54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

情境大学技能和职场认可技能(LCUS-WRS)测量问卷需要一个经过验证的可靠工具。本研究的目的是开发和验证测量大学情境技能和职场认可技能学习情况的问卷,以便对工作综合教育(WIE)学生和 LCUS-WRS 技能进行高级心理测量属性分析,包括内部和外部可靠性分析。研究方法我们进行了多阶段随机抽样,样本包括来自泰国 20 所农村学院的 728 名 WIE 学生。对样本中的一个子集(n = 279)进行了探索性因子分析(EFA),对另一个子集(n = 449)进行了确证性因子分析(CFA),两者均为不同的子集。此外,研究人员还分析了工具中量表的内部一致性和时间可靠性。 研究结果通过探索性因子分析,共确定了 39 个项目 6 个因子,占 CFA 模型方差的 55.881%。该模型的拟合优度为:chi-square (c2 ) = 582.907, df = 308, p = .000, c2 /df = 1.90, GFI = .979, AGFI = .985, RMSEA = .030, SRMR = .030 结论:LCUS-WRS 量表具有坚实的建构性:LCUS-WRS 量表具有坚实的建构效度和良好的内部一致性,可用于分析心理测量学特性。因此,LCUS-WRS 的测量维度保证了其在高等教育机构中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure the Learning of Context University Skills and Workplace-recognized Skills Test among Students WIE in Rural College Thailand
A questionnaire for measuring Context University Skills and Workplace-Recognized Skills (LCUS-WRS) requires a validated and reliable instrument. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire to measure learning of context university skills and workplace-recognized skills, in order to carry out an advanced psychometric properties analysis of Work-Integrated Education (WIE) students and the skills of LCUS-WRS, including internal and external reliability. Methods: We conducted multi-stage random sampling, with a sample consisting of 728 students WIE from 20 rural colleges in Thailand. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on a subset of the sample (n = 279), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted on another subset (n = 449), both in different subgroups. Additionally, the researcher analyzed the internal consistency and temporal reliability of the scale in the instrument. Results: Using exploratory factor analysis with 39 items 6 factors and accounted for 55.881% of variance was identified of the variance for the CFA model. The model achieved a goodness-of-fit of chi-square (c2 ) = 582.907, df = 308, p = .000, c2 /df = 1.90, GFI = .979, AGFI = .985, RMSEA = .030, SRMR = .030 Conclusion: LCUS-WRS scale has solid construct of validity and excellent internal consistency which to analyze psychometric properties It has optimum temporal reliability. Therefore, the indicated that the dimensions of measuring of LCUS-WRS guaranteed its use in higher education institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Guidelines for Enhancing Knowledge and Proficiency in Food Decoration Skills: RMUTP STEAM Education with Gamification: A Bibliometric Analysis Implementation of Cooperative Learning Method to Enhance the Students' Learning Ability and Students' Core Competencies Insights in Flexible Assessment from Students’ and Teachers’ Perspectives: A Focus Group Study The Role of the Training Program “Making Learning Visible” in Developing Creative Teaching Competencies of Bahrain Teachers College Faculty Members in the University of Bahrain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1