考虑乘客类型的机舱疏散模型

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 安全科学与韧性(英文) Pub Date : 2024-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.12.002
Yaping Ma , Jinfeng Yuan , Lingling Tan , Quanyi Liu , Mengling Li
{"title":"考虑乘客类型的机舱疏散模型","authors":"Yaping Ma ,&nbsp;Jinfeng Yuan ,&nbsp;Lingling Tan ,&nbsp;Quanyi Liu ,&nbsp;Mengling Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pedestrian safety evacuation in aircraft cabins has been a challenging problem because of the aircraft's unique characteristics, such as the diversity of passengers and the restricted evacuation environment. It is difficult to reproduce evacuation activities in aircraft cabin due to safety concerns and cost constraints. To fill this gap, an improved cellular automaton model of crowd evacuation for aircraft cabin is established by incorporating the characteristics of cabin space structures and passenger attributes. Passengers are divided into healthy individual passengers and disabled-healthy group passengers, whose movement mechanisms are quantified. Based on the constructed model, simulation experiments are conducted using the configuration cabin layout of B737-800 as an example. The results show that the evacuation time is prolonged with increased passenger density and the number of disabled passengers. Moreover, the overall evacuation time is insignificantly affected by whether disabled-healthy group passengers' seats are close to the aisle or window, and the evacuation efficiency is best when their seats are evenly distributed in the cabin. The evacuation time is the shortest when all cabin doors are open, and pedestrians are evacuated the slowest when the central emergency doors are closed. This study provides valuable insights into effective strategies for pedestrian evacuation and crowd emergency management of civil aircraft.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 83-90"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266644962400001X/pdfft?md5=2b7c167babf9fa412bbefbe329883b94&pid=1-s2.0-S266644962400001X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A model for aircraft cabin evacuation considering passenger type\",\"authors\":\"Yaping Ma ,&nbsp;Jinfeng Yuan ,&nbsp;Lingling Tan ,&nbsp;Quanyi Liu ,&nbsp;Mengling Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Pedestrian safety evacuation in aircraft cabins has been a challenging problem because of the aircraft's unique characteristics, such as the diversity of passengers and the restricted evacuation environment. It is difficult to reproduce evacuation activities in aircraft cabin due to safety concerns and cost constraints. To fill this gap, an improved cellular automaton model of crowd evacuation for aircraft cabin is established by incorporating the characteristics of cabin space structures and passenger attributes. Passengers are divided into healthy individual passengers and disabled-healthy group passengers, whose movement mechanisms are quantified. Based on the constructed model, simulation experiments are conducted using the configuration cabin layout of B737-800 as an example. The results show that the evacuation time is prolonged with increased passenger density and the number of disabled passengers. Moreover, the overall evacuation time is insignificantly affected by whether disabled-healthy group passengers' seats are close to the aisle or window, and the evacuation efficiency is best when their seats are evenly distributed in the cabin. The evacuation time is the shortest when all cabin doors are open, and pedestrians are evacuated the slowest when the central emergency doors are closed. This study provides valuable insights into effective strategies for pedestrian evacuation and crowd emergency management of civil aircraft.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":62710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"安全科学与韧性(英文)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 83-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266644962400001X/pdfft?md5=2b7c167babf9fa412bbefbe329883b94&pid=1-s2.0-S266644962400001X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"安全科学与韧性(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266644962400001X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266644962400001X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于飞机的独特性,如乘客的多样性和有限的疏散环境,飞机客舱内的行人安全疏散一直是一个具有挑战性的问题。出于安全考虑和成本限制,很难再现机舱内的疏散活动。为填补这一空白,本文结合机舱空间结构特点和乘客属性,建立了改进的机舱人群疏散蜂窝自动机模型。模型将乘客分为健康个体乘客和残障健康群体乘客,并量化了他们的移动机制。在所建模型的基础上,以 B737-800 型飞机的配置客舱布局为例进行了仿真实验。结果表明,随着乘客密度和残疾乘客数量的增加,疏散时间也会延长。此外,残障健康组乘客的座位是靠近过道还是靠近窗口对整体疏散时间的影响不大,当他们的座位在客舱内均匀分布时,疏散效率最佳。当机舱门全部打开时,疏散时间最短;当中央应急门关闭时,行人疏散速度最慢。这项研究为民用飞机行人疏散和人群应急管理的有效策略提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A model for aircraft cabin evacuation considering passenger type

Pedestrian safety evacuation in aircraft cabins has been a challenging problem because of the aircraft's unique characteristics, such as the diversity of passengers and the restricted evacuation environment. It is difficult to reproduce evacuation activities in aircraft cabin due to safety concerns and cost constraints. To fill this gap, an improved cellular automaton model of crowd evacuation for aircraft cabin is established by incorporating the characteristics of cabin space structures and passenger attributes. Passengers are divided into healthy individual passengers and disabled-healthy group passengers, whose movement mechanisms are quantified. Based on the constructed model, simulation experiments are conducted using the configuration cabin layout of B737-800 as an example. The results show that the evacuation time is prolonged with increased passenger density and the number of disabled passengers. Moreover, the overall evacuation time is insignificantly affected by whether disabled-healthy group passengers' seats are close to the aisle or window, and the evacuation efficiency is best when their seats are evenly distributed in the cabin. The evacuation time is the shortest when all cabin doors are open, and pedestrians are evacuated the slowest when the central emergency doors are closed. This study provides valuable insights into effective strategies for pedestrian evacuation and crowd emergency management of civil aircraft.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
期刊最新文献
Grasping emergency dynamics: A review of group evacuation techniques and strategies in major emergencies Multi-factor coupled forest fire model based on cellular automata Scenario construction and vulnerability assessment of natural hazards-triggered power grid accidents Risk assessment of fire casualty in underground commercial building based on FFTA-BN model Determination of individual disaster resilience levels of hospital staff: A case study of Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1