牛就是它们吃的东西:用大麦饲料喂养的牛与传统混合饲料喂养的牛相比的消费者分析

IF 1.6 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics Pub Date : 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1017/aae.2024.3
R. Feuz, D. Feuz, Audrey Lidgard, Zachary Crump, Kara Thornton, Silvana Martini, Haotian Cheng, Chandler Stafford, Sulaiman Matarneh
{"title":"牛就是它们吃的东西:用大麦饲料喂养的牛与传统混合饲料喂养的牛相比的消费者分析","authors":"R. Feuz, D. Feuz, Audrey Lidgard, Zachary Crump, Kara Thornton, Silvana Martini, Haotian Cheng, Chandler Stafford, Sulaiman Matarneh","doi":"10.1017/aae.2024.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We conduct sensory analysis and assess consumer preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for beef steaks from cattle fed hydroponically produced barley fodder (B-F) relative to those fed conventional mixed rations (CON). Results suggest consumers do not differentiate between B-F and CON when evaluating sensory attributes and possess similar WTP for both treatments. Preference toward the B-F treatment is demonstrated for sustainability-conscientious consumers informed about the potential sustainability benefits of the B-F treatment. Producers feeding hydroponically produced barley fodder should not expect premiums above beef-fed conventional feedstuff, yet establishing credence value around the sustainability of the B-F treatment may increase marketability.","PeriodicalId":14970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cattle Are What They Eat: A Consumer Analysis of Beef Produced from Barley Fodder-Fed Cattle Compared with a Conventional Mixed Ration\",\"authors\":\"R. Feuz, D. Feuz, Audrey Lidgard, Zachary Crump, Kara Thornton, Silvana Martini, Haotian Cheng, Chandler Stafford, Sulaiman Matarneh\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/aae.2024.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We conduct sensory analysis and assess consumer preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for beef steaks from cattle fed hydroponically produced barley fodder (B-F) relative to those fed conventional mixed rations (CON). Results suggest consumers do not differentiate between B-F and CON when evaluating sensory attributes and possess similar WTP for both treatments. Preference toward the B-F treatment is demonstrated for sustainability-conscientious consumers informed about the potential sustainability benefits of the B-F treatment. Producers feeding hydroponically produced barley fodder should not expect premiums above beef-fed conventional feedstuff, yet establishing credence value around the sustainability of the B-F treatment may increase marketability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2024.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2024.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们进行了感官分析,并评估了消费者对饲喂水培大麦饲料(B-F)和饲喂传统混合饲料(CON)的牛所产牛排的偏好和支付意愿(WTP)。结果表明,消费者在评估感官属性时不会区分 B-F 和 CON,并且对这两种处理的 WTP 相似。具有可持续发展意识的消费者在了解了 B-F 处理的潜在可持续发展优势后,会更倾向于 B-F 处理。饲喂水培生产的大麦饲料的生产者不应该期望比饲喂牛肉的传统饲料有更高的溢价,但是围绕 B-F 处理的可持续性建立可信价值可能会提高适销性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cattle Are What They Eat: A Consumer Analysis of Beef Produced from Barley Fodder-Fed Cattle Compared with a Conventional Mixed Ration
We conduct sensory analysis and assess consumer preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for beef steaks from cattle fed hydroponically produced barley fodder (B-F) relative to those fed conventional mixed rations (CON). Results suggest consumers do not differentiate between B-F and CON when evaluating sensory attributes and possess similar WTP for both treatments. Preference toward the B-F treatment is demonstrated for sustainability-conscientious consumers informed about the potential sustainability benefits of the B-F treatment. Producers feeding hydroponically produced barley fodder should not expect premiums above beef-fed conventional feedstuff, yet establishing credence value around the sustainability of the B-F treatment may increase marketability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, the Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics is a forum for creative and scholarly work in agricultural economics and related areas. Contributions on methodology and applications in business, extension, research, and teaching phases of agricultural and applied economics are equally encouraged. As of 2015 (Vol 47), articles are published on an open access basis.
期刊最新文献
A Micro-perspective Analysis of the Demand for Greek and Non-Greek Yogurt in the United States Over Calendar Years 2018 to 2020 Grazing Management Plan Adoption and Objective Prioritization in U.S. Cow-Calf and Stocker Operations Economic Analysis of Calving Assistance on Western Canadian Cow-Calf Operations Land Ownership Security, Farm Investment, and Investment Risk in Indian Agriculture: Evidence from Nationally Representative Survey Cultivating Support: An Ex-Ante Typological Analysis of Farmers’ Responses to Multi-Peril Crop Insurance Subsidies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1