俄罗斯电流刺激与法拉第电流对膝关节骨性关节炎疼痛和功能结果的比较研究

Janani Aishwarya, Undergraduate, Professor K.Koteeswaran
{"title":"俄罗斯电流刺激与法拉第电流对膝关节骨性关节炎疼痛和功能结果的比较研究","authors":"Janani Aishwarya, Undergraduate, Professor K.Koteeswaran","doi":"10.37506/2t5ts284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was designed to inspect the effectiveness of a comparative study on Russian CurrentStimulation versus Faradic Current in pain and functional outcome in osteoarthritis knee. Russian current is themost commonly used electrical stimulation to improve muscle strength. Faradic current is effective in treatingmuscle spasms caused by inflammation and in lowering painPurpose: To compare the effectiveness of Russian current stimulation versus Faradic current using the KOOSscale.Materials and Methods: This experimental study has been conducted from November 2022 to April 2023.A totalof 196 adults were collected from APR physiotherapy center with OA knee have been selected using the inclusionand exclusion criteria. They have been split into 2 groups Group A (n=98) and Group B (n=98) were assigned.Group A got Russian current stimulation, whereas Group B received Faradic current and the KOOS scale was usedto evaluate the subjects. The treatments were given for 5 sessions per week and continued for 4 weeks.Results: The mean value of Russian current at the post-test was found to be higher than the mean value of Faradiccurrent with a p-value of <0.0001.Conclusion: The result suggests that Russian current stimulation shows a significant effect in reducing pain in theOA knee when compared to Faradic current.","PeriodicalId":516273,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","volume":"5 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study on Russian Current Stimulation Versus Faradic Current in Pain and Functional Outcome in Osteoarthritis Knee\",\"authors\":\"Janani Aishwarya, Undergraduate, Professor K.Koteeswaran\",\"doi\":\"10.37506/2t5ts284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study was designed to inspect the effectiveness of a comparative study on Russian CurrentStimulation versus Faradic Current in pain and functional outcome in osteoarthritis knee. Russian current is themost commonly used electrical stimulation to improve muscle strength. Faradic current is effective in treatingmuscle spasms caused by inflammation and in lowering painPurpose: To compare the effectiveness of Russian current stimulation versus Faradic current using the KOOSscale.Materials and Methods: This experimental study has been conducted from November 2022 to April 2023.A totalof 196 adults were collected from APR physiotherapy center with OA knee have been selected using the inclusionand exclusion criteria. They have been split into 2 groups Group A (n=98) and Group B (n=98) were assigned.Group A got Russian current stimulation, whereas Group B received Faradic current and the KOOS scale was usedto evaluate the subjects. The treatments were given for 5 sessions per week and continued for 4 weeks.Results: The mean value of Russian current at the post-test was found to be higher than the mean value of Faradiccurrent with a p-value of <0.0001.Conclusion: The result suggests that Russian current stimulation shows a significant effect in reducing pain in theOA knee when compared to Faradic current.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"5 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37506/2t5ts284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/2t5ts284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在对俄罗斯电流刺激与法拉第电流刺激在膝关节骨性关节炎疼痛和功能结果方面的有效性进行比较研究。俄罗斯电流是最常用的改善肌肉力量的电刺激方法。法拉第电流可有效治疗炎症引起的肌肉痉挛并减轻疼痛。目的:使用 KOOS 量表比较俄罗斯电流刺激与法拉第电流的效果:本实验研究于 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 4 月进行。根据纳入和排除标准,从 APR 物理治疗中心共挑选了 196 名患有膝关节 OA 的成人。他们被分成两组,A 组(98 人)和 B 组(98 人),A 组接受俄式电流刺激,B 组接受法拉第电流刺激,并使用 KOOS 量表对受试者进行评估。治疗每周进行 5 次,持续 4 周:结论:结果表明,俄式电流刺激在后测试中的平均值高于法拉第电流刺激的平均值,P 值小于 0.0001:结果表明,与法拉第电流相比,俄式电流刺激在减轻主膝关节疼痛方面效果显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study on Russian Current Stimulation Versus Faradic Current in Pain and Functional Outcome in Osteoarthritis Knee
Background: This study was designed to inspect the effectiveness of a comparative study on Russian CurrentStimulation versus Faradic Current in pain and functional outcome in osteoarthritis knee. Russian current is themost commonly used electrical stimulation to improve muscle strength. Faradic current is effective in treatingmuscle spasms caused by inflammation and in lowering painPurpose: To compare the effectiveness of Russian current stimulation versus Faradic current using the KOOSscale.Materials and Methods: This experimental study has been conducted from November 2022 to April 2023.A totalof 196 adults were collected from APR physiotherapy center with OA knee have been selected using the inclusionand exclusion criteria. They have been split into 2 groups Group A (n=98) and Group B (n=98) were assigned.Group A got Russian current stimulation, whereas Group B received Faradic current and the KOOS scale was usedto evaluate the subjects. The treatments were given for 5 sessions per week and continued for 4 weeks.Results: The mean value of Russian current at the post-test was found to be higher than the mean value of Faradiccurrent with a p-value of <0.0001.Conclusion: The result suggests that Russian current stimulation shows a significant effect in reducing pain in theOA knee when compared to Faradic current.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Additional Effects Of Suboccipital Muscle Inhibition Along With Conventional Approach On Pain, Physical Function and Range of Motion in Patients with Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain: An Experimental Study Effect of TheraBand Exercises on Rounded Shoulders Associated with Pulmonary Capacity in Young Adults: A Pre-Post Intervention Study COVID-19 Effects on Well-being and Academic Performance in Physical Therapy Graduate Students: A Cross-Sectional Study Grip Strength Assessed Using A Hand Grip Dynamometer And Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire As Predictors Of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Using Rapid Upper Limb Assessment Among Power Loom Silk Weavers Effects of a Novel, Inexpensive Device “Striker” On Spatio-Temporal GaitParameters in Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1