麻醉护理能力量表(AnestComp)的心理测试

Samira Mahmoudi , Akram Yazdani , Fatemeh Hasanshiri
{"title":"麻醉护理能力量表(AnestComp)的心理测试","authors":"Samira Mahmoudi ,&nbsp;Akram Yazdani ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Hasanshiri","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aim</h3><p>The competence of anesthesia nurse<span><span> has a significant association with patient health and safety, reduction of medical errors, hospital infections, and postoperative complications. However, there is no instrument available to measure the competence of anesthesia nurse Iran. </span>Anesthesia Nursing<span> Competence Scale (AnestComp) is a self-assessment tool that measures the competence level of anesthesia Personnel. The present study sought to assess the psychometric<span> properties of the Persian version of AnestComp in the Iranian anesthesiology community.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Materials &amp; Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of AnestComp in a sample of 362 anesthesia nurse from hospitals affiliated with the University of Medical Sciences<span>. After translating the original version of the scale, the face, content, and structural validity as well as the reliability of the scale were evaluated. Data analysis was performed using SPSS-16 and AMOS-24 software.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The assessment of the face validity of AnestComp showed that the impact score for each item was greater than 3.13. Moreover, the average content validity ratio (CVR) for 38 items was 0.91 and the corresponding value for each item was greater than 0.54. The average content validity index (CVI) for 38 items was 0.93 and the related value for each item was greater than 0.73. In addition, item 39 was removed due to low CVR and CVI values. The construct validity of the scale was checked using confirmatory factor analysis<span> and the factor loading values for the items varied from 0.82 to 0.91, confirming that the seven factors of the scale were within acceptable ranges. Moreover, the reliability of the scale was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha of 0.981 and the correlation of 0.94 between the scores from the re-administration of the scale, indicating that the scale has acceptable internal consistency.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Persian version of AnestComp has acceptable psychometric properties and it can be used as a valid tool to measure the competencies of anesthesia Personnel.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric testing of anesthesia nursing competence scale (AnestComp)\",\"authors\":\"Samira Mahmoudi ,&nbsp;Akram Yazdani ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Hasanshiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aim</h3><p>The competence of anesthesia nurse<span><span> has a significant association with patient health and safety, reduction of medical errors, hospital infections, and postoperative complications. However, there is no instrument available to measure the competence of anesthesia nurse Iran. </span>Anesthesia Nursing<span> Competence Scale (AnestComp) is a self-assessment tool that measures the competence level of anesthesia Personnel. The present study sought to assess the psychometric<span> properties of the Persian version of AnestComp in the Iranian anesthesiology community.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Materials &amp; Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of AnestComp in a sample of 362 anesthesia nurse from hospitals affiliated with the University of Medical Sciences<span>. After translating the original version of the scale, the face, content, and structural validity as well as the reliability of the scale were evaluated. Data analysis was performed using SPSS-16 and AMOS-24 software.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The assessment of the face validity of AnestComp showed that the impact score for each item was greater than 3.13. Moreover, the average content validity ratio (CVR) for 38 items was 0.91 and the corresponding value for each item was greater than 0.54. The average content validity index (CVI) for 38 items was 0.93 and the related value for each item was greater than 0.73. In addition, item 39 was removed due to low CVR and CVI values. The construct validity of the scale was checked using confirmatory factor analysis<span> and the factor loading values for the items varied from 0.82 to 0.91, confirming that the seven factors of the scale were within acceptable ranges. Moreover, the reliability of the scale was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha of 0.981 and the correlation of 0.94 between the scores from the re-administration of the scale, indicating that the scale has acceptable internal consistency.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Persian version of AnestComp has acceptable psychometric properties and it can be used as a valid tool to measure the competencies of anesthesia Personnel.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603024000025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603024000025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景& 目的麻醉护士的能力与病人的健康和安全、减少医疗差错、医院感染和术后并发症有重要关系。然而,目前还没有一种工具可以测量伊朗麻醉护士的能力。麻醉护理能力量表(AnestComp)是一种自我评估工具,用于测量麻醉人员的能力水平。本研究旨在评估波斯语版 AnestComp 在伊朗麻醉界的心理测量特性。材料与amp; 方法本横断面研究旨在评估波斯语版 AnestComp 在医学科学大学附属医院 362 名麻醉护士样本中的心理测量特性。在翻译了量表的原始版本后,对量表的表面效度、内容效度、结构效度和信度进行了评估。结果 AnestComp 的面效度评估显示,每个项目的影响分均大于 3.13。此外,38 个项目的平均内容效度比(CVR)为 0.91,每个项目的相应值均大于 0.54。38 个项目的平均内容效度指数(CVI)为 0.93,每个项目的相关值均大于 0.73。此外,由于 CVR 和 CVI 值较低,第 39 个项目被删除。量表的建构效度采用确认性因子分析进行检验,各项目因子负荷值在 0.82 至 0.91 之间,证实量表的七个因子在可接受的范围内。此外,量表的信度也得到了证实,Cronbach's alpha 为 0.981,重新施用量表的得分之间的相关性为 0.94,表明量表具有可接受的内部一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric testing of anesthesia nursing competence scale (AnestComp)

Background & Aim

The competence of anesthesia nurse has a significant association with patient health and safety, reduction of medical errors, hospital infections, and postoperative complications. However, there is no instrument available to measure the competence of anesthesia nurse Iran. Anesthesia Nursing Competence Scale (AnestComp) is a self-assessment tool that measures the competence level of anesthesia Personnel. The present study sought to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of AnestComp in the Iranian anesthesiology community.

Materials & Methods

This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of AnestComp in a sample of 362 anesthesia nurse from hospitals affiliated with the University of Medical Sciences. After translating the original version of the scale, the face, content, and structural validity as well as the reliability of the scale were evaluated. Data analysis was performed using SPSS-16 and AMOS-24 software.

Results

The assessment of the face validity of AnestComp showed that the impact score for each item was greater than 3.13. Moreover, the average content validity ratio (CVR) for 38 items was 0.91 and the corresponding value for each item was greater than 0.54. The average content validity index (CVI) for 38 items was 0.93 and the related value for each item was greater than 0.73. In addition, item 39 was removed due to low CVR and CVI values. The construct validity of the scale was checked using confirmatory factor analysis and the factor loading values for the items varied from 0.82 to 0.91, confirming that the seven factors of the scale were within acceptable ranges. Moreover, the reliability of the scale was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha of 0.981 and the correlation of 0.94 between the scores from the re-administration of the scale, indicating that the scale has acceptable internal consistency.

Conclusion

The Persian version of AnestComp has acceptable psychometric properties and it can be used as a valid tool to measure the competencies of anesthesia Personnel.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
期刊最新文献
A study of the relationship between professional autonomy and professional quality of life among operating room personnel: A cross-sectional study Postoperative mechanical ventilation after corrective Tetralogy of Fallot surgery in infants: Assessment of perioperative factors and radiographic severity scores Compliance evaluation in post-anesthesia care units at teaching hospitals in Alborz Province, Iran Anaesthetic management of caesarean section in a primigravida with pre-eclampsia, pleural effusion, consolidation, and lung collapse – a case report The effect of surgical smoke on operating room workers, attitudes towards risks, and the implementation of preventive measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1