民主倒退、恢复力和抵抗力

IF 4.5 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS World Politics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1353/wp.0.a917802
R. Riedl, Paul Friesen, Jennifer McCoy, Kenneth Roberts
{"title":"民主倒退、恢复力和抵抗力","authors":"R. Riedl, Paul Friesen, Jennifer McCoy, Kenneth Roberts","doi":"10.1353/wp.0.a917802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article assesses two next-level questions in the study of democratic backsliding: democratic\nresilience and political polarization. It first advances a set of methodological decision\npoints to improve clarity in contemporary debates surrounding democratic backsliding\nmeasurement and the possibility of identifying moments of democratic recovery. It\nthen moves to a theoretical and empirical assessment of pathways by which democratic\nbacksliding takes place, under what conditions, which specific actors are involved, and\nwhat opportunities exist for democratic recovery given sources of resilience and strategies\nof resistance. The authors examine the role of political polarization in backsliding and\nhighlight the combined importance of political agency and institutional levers for regime\noutcomes. The authors argue that regime outcomes are not predetermined by antecedent\nconditions, and particularly not by the level of development.","PeriodicalId":48266,"journal":{"name":"World Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democratic Backsliding,\\nResilience, and Resistance\",\"authors\":\"R. Riedl, Paul Friesen, Jennifer McCoy, Kenneth Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/wp.0.a917802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article assesses two next-level questions in the study of democratic backsliding: democratic\\nresilience and political polarization. It first advances a set of methodological decision\\npoints to improve clarity in contemporary debates surrounding democratic backsliding\\nmeasurement and the possibility of identifying moments of democratic recovery. It\\nthen moves to a theoretical and empirical assessment of pathways by which democratic\\nbacksliding takes place, under what conditions, which specific actors are involved, and\\nwhat opportunities exist for democratic recovery given sources of resilience and strategies\\nof resistance. The authors examine the role of political polarization in backsliding and\\nhighlight the combined importance of political agency and institutional levers for regime\\noutcomes. The authors argue that regime outcomes are not predetermined by antecedent\\nconditions, and particularly not by the level of development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.0.a917802\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.0.a917802","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文评估了民主倒退研究中的两个下一阶段问题:民主复原力和政治极化。文章首先提出了一系列方法论上的决定点,以提高当代围绕民主倒退衡量标准的辩论的清晰度,以及确定民主恢复时刻的可能性。然后,从理论和实证角度评估了民主倒退发生的途径、在何种条件下发生、涉及哪些特定行为者,以及在复原力来源和抵抗战略的情况下民主恢复存在哪些机会。作者研究了政治两极化在倒退中的作用,并强调了政治机构和制度杠杆对政权结果的共同重要性。作者认为,政权的结果并不是由先决条件决定的,尤其不是由发展水平决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Democratic Backsliding, Resilience, and Resistance
This article assesses two next-level questions in the study of democratic backsliding: democratic resilience and political polarization. It first advances a set of methodological decision points to improve clarity in contemporary debates surrounding democratic backsliding measurement and the possibility of identifying moments of democratic recovery. It then moves to a theoretical and empirical assessment of pathways by which democratic backsliding takes place, under what conditions, which specific actors are involved, and what opportunities exist for democratic recovery given sources of resilience and strategies of resistance. The authors examine the role of political polarization in backsliding and highlight the combined importance of political agency and institutional levers for regime outcomes. The authors argue that regime outcomes are not predetermined by antecedent conditions, and particularly not by the level of development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Politics
World Politics Multiple-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: World Politics, founded in 1948, is an internationally renowned quarterly journal of political science published in both print and online versions. Open to contributions by scholars, World Politics invites submission of research articles that make theoretical and empirical contributions to the literature, review articles, and research notes bearing on problems in international relations and comparative politics. The journal does not publish articles on current affairs, policy pieces, or narratives of a journalistic nature. Articles submitted for consideration are unsolicited, except for review articles, which are usually commissioned. Published for the Princeton Institute for International and Regional Affairs
期刊最新文献
CONFLICT: Trajectories and Challenges THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS Social Democracy and the Birth of Working-Class Representation in Europe Concept Misformation in the Age of Democratic Anxiety: Recent Temptations and Their Downsides Fighting the Disease or Manipulating the Data? Democracy, State Capacity, and the COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1