使用平板电脑或台式电脑进行头颅测量分析的准确性和追踪时间:一项前瞻性研究。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Head & Face Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s13005-024-00413-5
Moritz Kanemeier, Claudius Middelberg, Thomas Stamm, Felix Albert, Ariane Hohoff, Jonas Q Schmid
{"title":"使用平板电脑或台式电脑进行头颅测量分析的准确性和追踪时间:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Moritz Kanemeier, Claudius Middelberg, Thomas Stamm, Felix Albert, Ariane Hohoff, Jonas Q Schmid","doi":"10.1186/s13005-024-00413-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective study aimed to evaluate the influence of the computer type (tablet or desktop) on accuracy and tracing time of cephalometric analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dental students used a web-based application specifically developed for this purpose to perform cephalometric analyses on tablet and desktop computers. Landmark locations and timestamps were exported to measure the accuracy, successful detection rate and tracing time. Reference landmarks were established by six experienced orthodontists. Statistical analysis included reliability assessment, descriptive statistics, and linear mixed effect models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a period of 8 semesters a total of 277 cephalometric analyses by 161 students were included. The interrater reliability of the orthodontists establishing the reference coordinates was excellent (ICC > 0.9). For the students, the mean landmark deviation was 2.05 mm and the successful detection rate for the clinically acceptable threshold of 2 mm suggested in the literature was 68.6%, with large variations among landmarks. No effect of the computer type on accuracy and tracing time of the cephalometric analyses could be found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of tablet computers for cephalometric analyses can be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":12994,"journal":{"name":"Head & Face Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and tracing time of cephalometric analyses on a tablet or desktop computer : A prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Moritz Kanemeier, Claudius Middelberg, Thomas Stamm, Felix Albert, Ariane Hohoff, Jonas Q Schmid\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13005-024-00413-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective study aimed to evaluate the influence of the computer type (tablet or desktop) on accuracy and tracing time of cephalometric analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dental students used a web-based application specifically developed for this purpose to perform cephalometric analyses on tablet and desktop computers. Landmark locations and timestamps were exported to measure the accuracy, successful detection rate and tracing time. Reference landmarks were established by six experienced orthodontists. Statistical analysis included reliability assessment, descriptive statistics, and linear mixed effect models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a period of 8 semesters a total of 277 cephalometric analyses by 161 students were included. The interrater reliability of the orthodontists establishing the reference coordinates was excellent (ICC > 0.9). For the students, the mean landmark deviation was 2.05 mm and the successful detection rate for the clinically acceptable threshold of 2 mm suggested in the literature was 68.6%, with large variations among landmarks. No effect of the computer type on accuracy and tracing time of the cephalometric analyses could be found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of tablet computers for cephalometric analyses can be recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head & Face Medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860254/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head & Face Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00413-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Face Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00413-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:这项前瞻性研究旨在评估电脑类型(平板电脑或台式电脑)对头颅测量分析的准确性和追踪时间的影响:这项前瞻性研究旨在评估电脑类型(平板电脑或台式电脑)对头颅测量分析的准确性和追踪时间的影响:方法: 牙科学生使用专门为此开发的网络应用程序,在平板电脑和台式电脑上进行头颅测量分析。导出地标位置和时间戳,以测量准确性、成功检测率和追踪时间。参考地标由六位经验丰富的正畸医生确定。统计分析包括可靠性评估、描述性统计和线性混合效应模型:结果:在 8 个学期中,共有 161 名学生进行了 277 次头颅测量分析。正畸医生在确定参考坐标时的交互可靠性非常好(ICC > 0.9)。对于学生而言,平均地标偏差为 2.05 毫米,文献中建议的临床可接受阈值 2 毫米的成功检测率为 68.6%,不同地标之间的差异很大。计算机类型对头颅测量分析的准确性和追踪时间没有影响:结论:建议使用平板电脑进行头颅测量分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy and tracing time of cephalometric analyses on a tablet or desktop computer : A prospective study.

Background: This prospective study aimed to evaluate the influence of the computer type (tablet or desktop) on accuracy and tracing time of cephalometric analyses.

Methods: Dental students used a web-based application specifically developed for this purpose to perform cephalometric analyses on tablet and desktop computers. Landmark locations and timestamps were exported to measure the accuracy, successful detection rate and tracing time. Reference landmarks were established by six experienced orthodontists. Statistical analysis included reliability assessment, descriptive statistics, and linear mixed effect models.

Results: Over a period of 8 semesters a total of 277 cephalometric analyses by 161 students were included. The interrater reliability of the orthodontists establishing the reference coordinates was excellent (ICC > 0.9). For the students, the mean landmark deviation was 2.05 mm and the successful detection rate for the clinically acceptable threshold of 2 mm suggested in the literature was 68.6%, with large variations among landmarks. No effect of the computer type on accuracy and tracing time of the cephalometric analyses could be found.

Conclusion: The use of tablet computers for cephalometric analyses can be recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Head & Face Medicine
Head & Face Medicine DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Head & Face Medicine is a multidisciplinary open access journal that publishes basic and clinical research concerning all aspects of cranial, facial and oral conditions. The journal covers all aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. It has been designed as a multidisciplinary journal for clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of diseases which affect the human head and face. The journal is wide-ranging, covering the development, aetiology, epidemiology and therapy of head and face diseases to the basic science that underlies these diseases. Management of head and face diseases includes all aspects of surgical and non-surgical treatments including psychopharmacological therapies.
期刊最新文献
Development of a machine learning-based predictive model for maxillary sinus cysts and exploration of clustering patterns. Influence of acidic solutions on surface roughness of polished and glazed CAD-CAM restorative materials. The effects of restorative material and connector cross-section area on the stress distribution of fixed partial denture: a finite element analysis. Schneiderian membrane perforation repair using a crosslinked collagen membrane: a retrospective cohort study. Temporomandibular disorder prevalence in malocclusion patients: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1