衡量早期青少年对不同他人的亲社会行为:考虑多重社会身份。

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Adolescence Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1002/jad.12305
Sonya Xinyue Xiao, Zehra Gülseven, Erin T. Clancy, Jeffrey Liew, Gustavo Carlo, Sarah Kim, Su Jiang
{"title":"衡量早期青少年对不同他人的亲社会行为:考虑多重社会身份。","authors":"Sonya Xinyue Xiao,&nbsp;Zehra Gülseven,&nbsp;Erin T. Clancy,&nbsp;Jeffrey Liew,&nbsp;Gustavo Carlo,&nbsp;Sarah Kim,&nbsp;Su Jiang","doi":"10.1002/jad.12305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>In a diverse society, individuals often need to make prosocial decisions toward others who vary on a range of intertwined social identities. Adolescence is a prime time to promote intergroup prosociality due to identity salience during this developmental stage. In this study, our goal was to develop and provide initial validation, of a novel measure on intergroup prosocial behavior considering gender and race/ethnicity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We used two independent samples of early adolescents (<i>N</i><sub>1</sub> = 118, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 12.21 years, 55% boys, 59% White collected nationally in the United States.; <i>N</i><sub>2</sub> = 133, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 12.77, 51.1% boys, 77% White collected locally in Arizona).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Using the data from Sample 1, Exploratory Factor Analyses revealed a two-factor solution capturing intergroup prosociality and personal distress. Confirmatory Factor Analyses with data from Sample 2 confirmed the factor structure. The reliability of intergroup prosociality was acceptable. Prosociality subscale was positively correlated with adolescents' empathy, sympathy, compliant, emotional, dire, and anonymous prosocial behaviors indicating convergent validity and negatively correlated with adolescents' public prosocial behavior indicating discriminant validity. Further, we examined whether youth engage in differential intergroup prosocial behavior using both variable-centered and person-centered approaches, combining data from Samples 1 and 2. While adolescents did not engage in differential intergroup prosocial behavior, Latent Profile Analyses revealed five distinct profiles of early adolescents' intergroup prosociality. Overall, this study advances research on youth's intergroup prosociality across two intersectional social identities, moving beyond the conceptualization of single social identities in intergroup research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring early adolescents' prosocial behavior toward diverse others: Considering multiple social identities\",\"authors\":\"Sonya Xinyue Xiao,&nbsp;Zehra Gülseven,&nbsp;Erin T. Clancy,&nbsp;Jeffrey Liew,&nbsp;Gustavo Carlo,&nbsp;Sarah Kim,&nbsp;Su Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jad.12305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a diverse society, individuals often need to make prosocial decisions toward others who vary on a range of intertwined social identities. Adolescence is a prime time to promote intergroup prosociality due to identity salience during this developmental stage. In this study, our goal was to develop and provide initial validation, of a novel measure on intergroup prosocial behavior considering gender and race/ethnicity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used two independent samples of early adolescents (<i>N</i><sub>1</sub> = 118, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 12.21 years, 55% boys, 59% White collected nationally in the United States.; <i>N</i><sub>2</sub> = 133, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 12.77, 51.1% boys, 77% White collected locally in Arizona).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using the data from Sample 1, Exploratory Factor Analyses revealed a two-factor solution capturing intergroup prosociality and personal distress. Confirmatory Factor Analyses with data from Sample 2 confirmed the factor structure. The reliability of intergroup prosociality was acceptable. Prosociality subscale was positively correlated with adolescents' empathy, sympathy, compliant, emotional, dire, and anonymous prosocial behaviors indicating convergent validity and negatively correlated with adolescents' public prosocial behavior indicating discriminant validity. Further, we examined whether youth engage in differential intergroup prosocial behavior using both variable-centered and person-centered approaches, combining data from Samples 1 and 2. While adolescents did not engage in differential intergroup prosocial behavior, Latent Profile Analyses revealed five distinct profiles of early adolescents' intergroup prosociality. Overall, this study advances research on youth's intergroup prosociality across two intersectional social identities, moving beyond the conceptualization of single social identities in intergroup research.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adolescence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jad.12305\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jad.12305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在一个多元化的社会中,个人往往需要对那些社会身份各不相同的人做出亲社会的决定。青春期是促进群体间亲社会性的黄金时期,因为在这一发展阶段,身份认同具有显著性。在本研究中,我们的目标是开发并初步验证一种考虑到性别和种族/民族的新型群际亲社会行为测量方法:我们使用了两个独立的早期青少年样本(样本 1 = 118,年龄 = 12.21 岁,55% 为男孩,59% 为白人,在美国全国范围内收集;样本 2 = 133,年龄 = 12.77,51.1% 为男孩,77% 为白人,在亚利桑那州当地收集):利用样本 1 的数据,探索性因子分析显示了一个捕捉群体间亲社会性和个人痛苦的双因子解决方案。利用样本 2 的数据进行的确认性因子分析证实了这一因子结构。群际亲社会性的信度是可以接受的。亲社会性子量表与青少年的移情、同情、顺从、情绪化、窘迫和匿名亲社会行为呈正相关,表明了趋同效度;与青少年的公共亲社会行为呈负相关,表明了区分效度。此外,我们还结合样本 1 和样本 2 的数据,采用变量中心和个人中心两种方法研究了青少年是否有不同的群体间亲社会行为。虽然青少年没有参与不同的群体间亲社会行为,但潜特征分析揭示了早期青少年群体间亲社会性的五种不同特征。总之,这项研究推动了对青少年跨越两种交叉社会身份的群际亲社会性的研究,超越了群际研究中单一社会身份的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring early adolescents' prosocial behavior toward diverse others: Considering multiple social identities

Introduction

In a diverse society, individuals often need to make prosocial decisions toward others who vary on a range of intertwined social identities. Adolescence is a prime time to promote intergroup prosociality due to identity salience during this developmental stage. In this study, our goal was to develop and provide initial validation, of a novel measure on intergroup prosocial behavior considering gender and race/ethnicity.

Method

We used two independent samples of early adolescents (N1 = 118, Mage = 12.21 years, 55% boys, 59% White collected nationally in the United States.; N2 = 133, Mage = 12.77, 51.1% boys, 77% White collected locally in Arizona).

Results

Using the data from Sample 1, Exploratory Factor Analyses revealed a two-factor solution capturing intergroup prosociality and personal distress. Confirmatory Factor Analyses with data from Sample 2 confirmed the factor structure. The reliability of intergroup prosociality was acceptable. Prosociality subscale was positively correlated with adolescents' empathy, sympathy, compliant, emotional, dire, and anonymous prosocial behaviors indicating convergent validity and negatively correlated with adolescents' public prosocial behavior indicating discriminant validity. Further, we examined whether youth engage in differential intergroup prosocial behavior using both variable-centered and person-centered approaches, combining data from Samples 1 and 2. While adolescents did not engage in differential intergroup prosocial behavior, Latent Profile Analyses revealed five distinct profiles of early adolescents' intergroup prosociality. Overall, this study advances research on youth's intergroup prosociality across two intersectional social identities, moving beyond the conceptualization of single social identities in intergroup research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescence
Journal of Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adolescence is an international, broad based, cross-disciplinary journal that addresses issues of professional and academic importance concerning development between puberty and the attainment of adult status within society. It provides a forum for all who are concerned with the nature of adolescence, whether involved in teaching, research, guidance, counseling, treatment, or other services. The aim of the journal is to encourage research and foster good practice through publishing both empirical and clinical studies as well as integrative reviews and theoretical advances.
期刊最新文献
Adolescents' meaning making of salient emotional experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gender messages in girls' puberty books: A focus on parent representation. Put at and kept from risk: The sexual risk dilemmas confronting marginalized youth. Pants on fire: Risks for and outcomes of atypical lying. The links between parenting, self-esteem, and depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1