剪切波测量在肝纤维化检测中的诊断性能:一项多中心前瞻性研究

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hepatology Research Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1111/hepr.14026
Takashi Kumada, Hidenori Toyoda, Sadanobu Ogawa, Tatsuya Gotoh, Yuichi Yoshida, Masahiro Yamahira, Masashi Hirooka, Yohei Koizumi, Yoichi Hiasa, Tsutomu Tamai, Ryoko Kuromatsu, Toshihisa Matsuzaki, Tomoyuki Suehiro, Yoshihiro Kamada, Yoshio Sumida, Junko Tanaka, Masahito Shimizu
{"title":"剪切波测量在肝纤维化检测中的诊断性能:一项多中心前瞻性研究","authors":"Takashi Kumada,&nbsp;Hidenori Toyoda,&nbsp;Sadanobu Ogawa,&nbsp;Tatsuya Gotoh,&nbsp;Yuichi Yoshida,&nbsp;Masahiro Yamahira,&nbsp;Masashi Hirooka,&nbsp;Yohei Koizumi,&nbsp;Yoichi Hiasa,&nbsp;Tsutomu Tamai,&nbsp;Ryoko Kuromatsu,&nbsp;Toshihisa Matsuzaki,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Suehiro,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Kamada,&nbsp;Yoshio Sumida,&nbsp;Junko Tanaka,&nbsp;Masahito Shimizu","doi":"10.1111/hepr.14026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to establish the shear wave measurement (SWM) cut-off value for each fibrosis stage using magnetic resonance (MR) elastography values as a reference standard.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We prospectively analyzed 594 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent SWM and MR elastography. Correlation coefficients (were analyzed, and the diagnostic value was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Liver stiffness was categorized by MR elastography as F0 (&lt;2.61 kPa), F1 (≥2.61 kPa, &lt;2.97 kPa, any fibrosis), F2 (≥2.97 kPa, &lt;3.62 kPa, significant fibrosis), F3 (≥3.62 kPa, &lt;4.62 kPa, advanced fibrosis), or F4 (≥4.62 kPa, cirrhosis).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median SWM values increased significantly with increasing fibrosis stage (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The correlation coefficient between SWM and MR elastography values was 0.793 (95% confidence interval 0.761–0.821). The correlation coefficients between SWM and MR elastography values significantly decreased with increasing body mass index and skin–capsular distance; skin–capsular distance values were associated with significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or positive predictive value, whereas body mass index values were not. The best cut-off values for any fibrosis, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 6.18, 7.09, 8.05, and 10.89 kPa, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This multicenter study in a large number of patients established SWM cut-off values for different degrees of fibrosis in chronic liver diseases using MR elastography as a reference standard. It is expected that these cut-off values will be applied to liver diseases in the future.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12987,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hepr.14026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of shear wave measurement in the detection of hepatic fibrosis: A multicenter prospective study\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Kumada,&nbsp;Hidenori Toyoda,&nbsp;Sadanobu Ogawa,&nbsp;Tatsuya Gotoh,&nbsp;Yuichi Yoshida,&nbsp;Masahiro Yamahira,&nbsp;Masashi Hirooka,&nbsp;Yohei Koizumi,&nbsp;Yoichi Hiasa,&nbsp;Tsutomu Tamai,&nbsp;Ryoko Kuromatsu,&nbsp;Toshihisa Matsuzaki,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Suehiro,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Kamada,&nbsp;Yoshio Sumida,&nbsp;Junko Tanaka,&nbsp;Masahito Shimizu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hepr.14026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to establish the shear wave measurement (SWM) cut-off value for each fibrosis stage using magnetic resonance (MR) elastography values as a reference standard.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We prospectively analyzed 594 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent SWM and MR elastography. Correlation coefficients (were analyzed, and the diagnostic value was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Liver stiffness was categorized by MR elastography as F0 (&lt;2.61 kPa), F1 (≥2.61 kPa, &lt;2.97 kPa, any fibrosis), F2 (≥2.97 kPa, &lt;3.62 kPa, significant fibrosis), F3 (≥3.62 kPa, &lt;4.62 kPa, advanced fibrosis), or F4 (≥4.62 kPa, cirrhosis).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The median SWM values increased significantly with increasing fibrosis stage (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The correlation coefficient between SWM and MR elastography values was 0.793 (95% confidence interval 0.761–0.821). The correlation coefficients between SWM and MR elastography values significantly decreased with increasing body mass index and skin–capsular distance; skin–capsular distance values were associated with significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or positive predictive value, whereas body mass index values were not. The best cut-off values for any fibrosis, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 6.18, 7.09, 8.05, and 10.89 kPa, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This multicenter study in a large number of patients established SWM cut-off values for different degrees of fibrosis in chronic liver diseases using MR elastography as a reference standard. It is expected that these cut-off values will be applied to liver diseases in the future.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hepr.14026\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hepr.14026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hepr.14026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在以磁共振(MR)弹性成像值为参考标准,确定各纤维化阶段的剪切波测量(SWM)临界值:我们对 594 例接受剪切波测量和磁共振弹性成像检查的慢性肝病患者进行了前瞻性分析。分析了相关系数,并通过接收者操作特征曲线下的面积评估了诊断价值。核磁共振弹性成像将肝硬度分为 F0(结果:随着肝纤维化分期的增加,SWM 的中位值明显增加(p 结论:SWM 的中位值随着肝纤维化分期的增加而增加:这项针对大量患者的多中心研究以磁共振弹性成像为参考标准,确定了慢性肝病不同纤维化程度的 SWM 临界值。预计这些临界值今后将应用于肝脏疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic performance of shear wave measurement in the detection of hepatic fibrosis: A multicenter prospective study

Aim

This study aimed to establish the shear wave measurement (SWM) cut-off value for each fibrosis stage using magnetic resonance (MR) elastography values as a reference standard.

Methods

We prospectively analyzed 594 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent SWM and MR elastography. Correlation coefficients (were analyzed, and the diagnostic value was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Liver stiffness was categorized by MR elastography as F0 (<2.61 kPa), F1 (≥2.61 kPa, <2.97 kPa, any fibrosis), F2 (≥2.97 kPa, <3.62 kPa, significant fibrosis), F3 (≥3.62 kPa, <4.62 kPa, advanced fibrosis), or F4 (≥4.62 kPa, cirrhosis).

Results

The median SWM values increased significantly with increasing fibrosis stage (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between SWM and MR elastography values was 0.793 (95% confidence interval 0.761–0.821). The correlation coefficients between SWM and MR elastography values significantly decreased with increasing body mass index and skin–capsular distance; skin–capsular distance values were associated with significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or positive predictive value, whereas body mass index values were not. The best cut-off values for any fibrosis, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 6.18, 7.09, 8.05, and 10.89 kPa, respectively.

Conclusions

This multicenter study in a large number of patients established SWM cut-off values for different degrees of fibrosis in chronic liver diseases using MR elastography as a reference standard. It is expected that these cut-off values will be applied to liver diseases in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology Research
Hepatology Research 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
124
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hepatology Research (formerly International Hepatology Communications) is the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, and publishes original articles, reviews and short comunications dealing with hepatology. Reviews or mini-reviews are especially welcomed from those areas within hepatology undergoing rapid changes. Short communications should contain concise definitive information.
期刊最新文献
Distinct characteristics of MetALD (metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease with greater alcohol consumption) in the general population. Unveiling the dynamics of hepatitis C virus transmission among injection drug users and men who have sex with men: A comprehensive study in Japan. Issue Information Diagnostic accuracy of hepatitis E virus antibody tests: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Risk model for predicting failure to rescue after hepatectomy: Cohort study of 1371 consecutive patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1