在重建前十字韧带方面,全内固定技术的愈合效果优于传统技术。

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL European Journal of Translational Myology Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.4081/ejtm.2024.11970
Xiong Li, Wu Cao, Hongyu Zhou, Ruida Ji, Jian Xiao, Chen Zhao
{"title":"在重建前十字韧带方面,全内固定技术的愈合效果优于传统技术。","authors":"Xiong Li, Wu Cao, Hongyu Zhou, Ruida Ji, Jian Xiao, Chen Zhao","doi":"10.4081/ejtm.2024.11970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our main objective was to examine the curative effect of all inside technique and traditional technique in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. In our retrospective study at the First People's Hospital of Jiashan County, we analyzed 88 participants with ACL injuries (50 males, 38 females, average age 27 years). They were randomly divided into two groups: traditional ACL reconstruction (42 participants) and all inside ACL reconstruction (46 participants). We measured and recorded the Visual Analog Scores (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm scores, operation time, graft diameter and length between the traditional technique group and all inside technique group. There were statistically significant differences in the Lysholm scores and IKDC scores between traditional and all inside technique groups. The all inside technique showed a higher efficacy and effective post-operative recovery with minimal pain and recurrent injuries. Our findings showed that the differences in gender, age, side of injury and operation time were not significant (p> 0.05). Follow-up was conducted at 6 months and 12 months post operations (mean, 7.5 ± 1.1 months). All inside technique minimizing tissue disruption, optimizing graft placement and facilitating early recovery have a significant impact on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46459,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Translational Myology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The healing effect of the all inside technique is superior to the traditional technique in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.\",\"authors\":\"Xiong Li, Wu Cao, Hongyu Zhou, Ruida Ji, Jian Xiao, Chen Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/ejtm.2024.11970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our main objective was to examine the curative effect of all inside technique and traditional technique in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. In our retrospective study at the First People's Hospital of Jiashan County, we analyzed 88 participants with ACL injuries (50 males, 38 females, average age 27 years). They were randomly divided into two groups: traditional ACL reconstruction (42 participants) and all inside ACL reconstruction (46 participants). We measured and recorded the Visual Analog Scores (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm scores, operation time, graft diameter and length between the traditional technique group and all inside technique group. There were statistically significant differences in the Lysholm scores and IKDC scores between traditional and all inside technique groups. The all inside technique showed a higher efficacy and effective post-operative recovery with minimal pain and recurrent injuries. Our findings showed that the differences in gender, age, side of injury and operation time were not significant (p> 0.05). Follow-up was conducted at 6 months and 12 months post operations (mean, 7.5 ± 1.1 months). All inside technique minimizing tissue disruption, optimizing graft placement and facilitating early recovery have a significant impact on patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Translational Myology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017173/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Translational Myology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2024.11970\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Translational Myology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2024.11970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的主要目的是研究全内固定技术和传统技术在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中的疗效。在嘉善县第一人民医院进行的回顾性研究中,我们分析了 88 名前交叉韧带损伤患者(50 名男性,38 名女性,平均年龄 27 岁)。他们被随机分为两组:传统前交叉韧带重建组(42 人)和全内侧前交叉韧带重建组(46 人)。我们测量并记录了传统技术组和全内侧技术组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、Lysholm评分、手术时间、移植物直径和长度。传统技术组和全内路技术组的 Lysholm 评分和 IKDC 评分在统计学上有显著差异。全内固定技术的疗效更高,术后恢复更有效,疼痛和复发损伤更小。我们的研究结果表明,两组患者在性别、年龄、受伤侧和手术时间上的差异均无显著性(P> 0.05)。我们在术后 6 个月和 12 个月进行了随访(平均为 7.5 ± 1.1 个月)。所有的内部技术都能最大限度地减少组织破坏、优化移植物放置和促进早日康复,这对患者的预后有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The healing effect of the all inside technique is superior to the traditional technique in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Our main objective was to examine the curative effect of all inside technique and traditional technique in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. In our retrospective study at the First People's Hospital of Jiashan County, we analyzed 88 participants with ACL injuries (50 males, 38 females, average age 27 years). They were randomly divided into two groups: traditional ACL reconstruction (42 participants) and all inside ACL reconstruction (46 participants). We measured and recorded the Visual Analog Scores (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm scores, operation time, graft diameter and length between the traditional technique group and all inside technique group. There were statistically significant differences in the Lysholm scores and IKDC scores between traditional and all inside technique groups. The all inside technique showed a higher efficacy and effective post-operative recovery with minimal pain and recurrent injuries. Our findings showed that the differences in gender, age, side of injury and operation time were not significant (p> 0.05). Follow-up was conducted at 6 months and 12 months post operations (mean, 7.5 ± 1.1 months). All inside technique minimizing tissue disruption, optimizing graft placement and facilitating early recovery have a significant impact on patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Translational Myology
European Journal of Translational Myology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
27.30%
发文量
74
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Low level laser therapy and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Efficacy of electrical stimulation of the zygomaticus muscle in complete facial paralysis: evidence from facial grading and automated image analysis. Deceleration of denervated facial muscle atrophy through functional electrical stimulation: a sonographic quantification in patients with facial nerve paralysis. Obsessive-compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder, and addiction: the vicious relationship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1