IF 0.3 4区 医学Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTHSante PubliquePub Date : 2024-01-01
Marie Jauffret-Roustide, Jean-Maxence Granier, Karine Bertrand
{"title":"思考参与式研究的亲密关系和认识论问题。以毒品政策同行研究者伙伴关系为例。","authors":"Marie Jauffret-Roustide, Jean-Maxence Granier, Karine Bertrand","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Participatory health research is developing rapidly. Certain issues make the involvement of people with experiential knowledge in research both more complex and more necessary. This is the case for people who use drugs, whose knowledge rendered invisible by the illegality of drug use and the multiple ensuing forms of domination and stigmatization. The purpose of this article is to recount a particular experience of close long-term partnership between a person with experiential knowledge and an academic researcher. Based on a singular collaboration, this article sheds light on the contributions of participatory research, their social and political effects, and their limits. It shows how each stakeholder draws on the knowledge of the other to co-produce research that can help public action evolve and limit epistemic injustices. It also highlights the multiple identities present in this type of collaboration, which foster the conditions for the co-production of knowledge, and suggests ways of enabling similar collaborations with diverse groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penser paritairement les enjeux intimes et épistémologiques des recherches participatives. L’exemple d’un compagnonnage pair-chercheur sur les politiques des drogues.\",\"authors\":\"Marie Jauffret-Roustide, Jean-Maxence Granier, Karine Bertrand\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Participatory health research is developing rapidly. Certain issues make the involvement of people with experiential knowledge in research both more complex and more necessary. This is the case for people who use drugs, whose knowledge rendered invisible by the illegality of drug use and the multiple ensuing forms of domination and stigmatization. The purpose of this article is to recount a particular experience of close long-term partnership between a person with experiential knowledge and an academic researcher. Based on a singular collaboration, this article sheds light on the contributions of participatory research, their social and political effects, and their limits. It shows how each stakeholder draws on the knowledge of the other to co-produce research that can help public action evolve and limit epistemic injustices. It also highlights the multiple identities present in this type of collaboration, which foster the conditions for the co-production of knowledge, and suggests ways of enabling similar collaborations with diverse groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sante Publique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sante Publique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Penser paritairement les enjeux intimes et épistémologiques des recherches participatives. L’exemple d’un compagnonnage pair-chercheur sur les politiques des drogues.
Participatory health research is developing rapidly. Certain issues make the involvement of people with experiential knowledge in research both more complex and more necessary. This is the case for people who use drugs, whose knowledge rendered invisible by the illegality of drug use and the multiple ensuing forms of domination and stigmatization. The purpose of this article is to recount a particular experience of close long-term partnership between a person with experiential knowledge and an academic researcher. Based on a singular collaboration, this article sheds light on the contributions of participatory research, their social and political effects, and their limits. It shows how each stakeholder draws on the knowledge of the other to co-produce research that can help public action evolve and limit epistemic injustices. It also highlights the multiple identities present in this type of collaboration, which foster the conditions for the co-production of knowledge, and suggests ways of enabling similar collaborations with diverse groups.
期刊介绍:
La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs,
professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie
des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions
de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de
soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale.
Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur
l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants
et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé,
organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques
de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation
et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille
sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents
secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique
d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources,
politiques de régulation et de financement, etc