多标准面板数据定向距离与多维高等教育系统的效率测量

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Omega-international Journal of Management Science Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2024.103044
Thyago C.C. Nepomuceno , Tommaso Agasisti , Alice Bertoletti , Cinzia Daraio
{"title":"多标准面板数据定向距离与多维高等教育系统的效率测量","authors":"Thyago C.C. Nepomuceno ,&nbsp;Tommaso Agasisti ,&nbsp;Alice Bertoletti ,&nbsp;Cinzia Daraio","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we introduce the notion of multicriteria-based directional distance determination for estimating the efficiency of decision units under different (and sometimes conflicting) interests and objectives. Different objectives are interpreted as different dimensions of a production system. Multidimensional industries, such as the Higher Education system, usually have clear preference structures and value judgments over teaching, research and service (outreach), leading to ranking differences for countries and organizations based on policy perspectives, production compensations, substitutions or complementation. We develop this framework based on the non-compensatory reasoning of outranking multicriteria methods to determine the most practical directional vector for the output expansion of Higher Education and support a multidimensional efficiency measurement. The numerical application using panel data illustrates policy-directed European countries based on the three dimensions of higher education. A similar understanding can be extended for determining directional efficiency for service units based on other multicriteria methods and heuristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicriteria panel-data directional distances and the efficiency measurement of multidimensional higher education systems\",\"authors\":\"Thyago C.C. Nepomuceno ,&nbsp;Tommaso Agasisti ,&nbsp;Alice Bertoletti ,&nbsp;Cinzia Daraio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, we introduce the notion of multicriteria-based directional distance determination for estimating the efficiency of decision units under different (and sometimes conflicting) interests and objectives. Different objectives are interpreted as different dimensions of a production system. Multidimensional industries, such as the Higher Education system, usually have clear preference structures and value judgments over teaching, research and service (outreach), leading to ranking differences for countries and organizations based on policy perspectives, production compensations, substitutions or complementation. We develop this framework based on the non-compensatory reasoning of outranking multicriteria methods to determine the most practical directional vector for the output expansion of Higher Education and support a multidimensional efficiency measurement. The numerical application using panel data illustrates policy-directed European countries based on the three dimensions of higher education. A similar understanding can be extended for determining directional efficiency for service units based on other multicriteria methods and heuristics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000112\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们引入了基于多标准的定向距离判定概念,用于估算不同(有时是相互冲突的)利益和目标下决策单元的效率。不同的目标被解释为生产系统的不同维度。多维行业,如高等教育系统,通常对教学、研究和服务(外联)有明确的偏好结构和价值判断,从而导致国家和组织基于政策视角、生产补偿、替代或互补的排名差异。我们基于非补偿性的排序多标准方法推理建立了这一框架,以确定高等教育产出扩张的最实用方向向量,并支持多维效率衡量。使用面板数据的数值应用说明了欧洲国家基于高等教育三个维度的政策导向。类似的理解也可扩展到基于其他多标准方法和启发式方法来确定服务单位的定向效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multicriteria panel-data directional distances and the efficiency measurement of multidimensional higher education systems

In this paper, we introduce the notion of multicriteria-based directional distance determination for estimating the efficiency of decision units under different (and sometimes conflicting) interests and objectives. Different objectives are interpreted as different dimensions of a production system. Multidimensional industries, such as the Higher Education system, usually have clear preference structures and value judgments over teaching, research and service (outreach), leading to ranking differences for countries and organizations based on policy perspectives, production compensations, substitutions or complementation. We develop this framework based on the non-compensatory reasoning of outranking multicriteria methods to determine the most practical directional vector for the output expansion of Higher Education and support a multidimensional efficiency measurement. The numerical application using panel data illustrates policy-directed European countries based on the three dimensions of higher education. A similar understanding can be extended for determining directional efficiency for service units based on other multicriteria methods and heuristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
期刊最新文献
An integrated approach for lot-sizing and storage assignment Editorial Board Hotel recommendation mechanism based on online reviews considering multi-attribute cooperative and interactive characteristics The impact of green innovations on firm’s sustainable operations: Process innovation and recycling innovation Does ESG protect firms equally during crises? The role of supply chain concentration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1