调查 MePlusMe 的可行性,这是一项旨在支持高校学生心理健康、幸福感和学习技能的在线干预措施。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-12 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2022.2069699
Rhianna Goozee, Alexia Barrable, Jelena Lubenko, Marietta Papadatou-Pastou, Mark Haddad, Eamonn McKeown, Shashivadan P Hirani, Maryanne Martin, Patapia Tzotzoli
{"title":"调查 MePlusMe 的可行性,这是一项旨在支持高校学生心理健康、幸福感和学习技能的在线干预措施。","authors":"Rhianna Goozee, Alexia Barrable, Jelena Lubenko, Marietta Papadatou-Pastou, Mark Haddad, Eamonn McKeown, Shashivadan P Hirani, Maryanne Martin, Patapia Tzotzoli","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2022.2069699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While there are several web-based mental health interventions, few target higher education (HE) students. Importantly, more research is needed to establish their effectiveness. Here, we provide a pragmatic evaluation of an online intervention (MePlusMe) specifically designed to improve the mental health, well-being, and study skills of HE students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the published protocol for a feasibility study, we recruited a convenience sample of 137 HE students to participate in an eight-week intervention, with 26 participants retained at week 8. Validated measures of mood (depression and anxiety), well-being, and self-efficacy were collected at baseline, 2, 4, and 8<b> </b>weeks, alongside two feedback forms assessing design and functionality (baseline) and engagement (week 4 and 8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed significant reductions in levels of anxiety and depression as well as increases in well-being, but no changes in self-efficacy. Participants rated the system design and functionality positively and qualitative findings indicated high levels of satisfaction with MePlusMe.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings support both the acceptability and the effectiveness of MePlusMe. Nonetheless, modest retention rates limit the precision and generalisability of these findings. Further investigation should ascertain optimal duration of engagement, most acceptable means of outcome assessment, and further detail about obstacles to utilisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"576-586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the feasibility of MePlusMe, an online intervention to support mental health, well-being, and study skills in higher education students.\",\"authors\":\"Rhianna Goozee, Alexia Barrable, Jelena Lubenko, Marietta Papadatou-Pastou, Mark Haddad, Eamonn McKeown, Shashivadan P Hirani, Maryanne Martin, Patapia Tzotzoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638237.2022.2069699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While there are several web-based mental health interventions, few target higher education (HE) students. Importantly, more research is needed to establish their effectiveness. Here, we provide a pragmatic evaluation of an online intervention (MePlusMe) specifically designed to improve the mental health, well-being, and study skills of HE students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the published protocol for a feasibility study, we recruited a convenience sample of 137 HE students to participate in an eight-week intervention, with 26 participants retained at week 8. Validated measures of mood (depression and anxiety), well-being, and self-efficacy were collected at baseline, 2, 4, and 8<b> </b>weeks, alongside two feedback forms assessing design and functionality (baseline) and engagement (week 4 and 8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed significant reductions in levels of anxiety and depression as well as increases in well-being, but no changes in self-efficacy. Participants rated the system design and functionality positively and qualitative findings indicated high levels of satisfaction with MePlusMe.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings support both the acceptability and the effectiveness of MePlusMe. Nonetheless, modest retention rates limit the precision and generalisability of these findings. Further investigation should ascertain optimal duration of engagement, most acceptable means of outcome assessment, and further detail about obstacles to utilisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"576-586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2022.2069699\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2022.2069699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:虽然有一些基于网络的心理健康干预措施,但很少有针对高等教育(HE)学生的。重要的是,需要更多的研究来确定其有效性。在此,我们对专门为改善高校学生的心理健康、幸福感和学习技能而设计的在线干预措施(MePlusMe)进行了务实的评估:根据已公布的可行性研究方案,我们招募了 137 名高校学生参加为期八周的干预活动,其中有 26 名参与者在第 8 周时仍在接受干预。我们在基线、2周、4周和8周收集了经过验证的情绪(抑郁和焦虑)、幸福感和自我效能的测量数据,同时还收集了两份反馈表,分别评估设计和功能(基线)以及参与度(第4周和第8周):我们观察到焦虑和抑郁水平明显下降,幸福感有所提高,但自我效能感没有变化。参与者对系统的设计和功能给予了积极评价,定性研究结果表明他们对 MePlusMe 的满意度很高:讨论:研究结果支持 MePlusMe 的可接受性和有效性。然而,适度的保留率限制了这些研究结果的精确性和普遍性。进一步的调查应确定参与的最佳持续时间、最可接受的结果评估方法以及有关使用障碍的更多细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the feasibility of MePlusMe, an online intervention to support mental health, well-being, and study skills in higher education students.

Introduction: While there are several web-based mental health interventions, few target higher education (HE) students. Importantly, more research is needed to establish their effectiveness. Here, we provide a pragmatic evaluation of an online intervention (MePlusMe) specifically designed to improve the mental health, well-being, and study skills of HE students.

Methods: In accordance with the published protocol for a feasibility study, we recruited a convenience sample of 137 HE students to participate in an eight-week intervention, with 26 participants retained at week 8. Validated measures of mood (depression and anxiety), well-being, and self-efficacy were collected at baseline, 2, 4, and 8weeks, alongside two feedback forms assessing design and functionality (baseline) and engagement (week 4 and 8).

Results: We observed significant reductions in levels of anxiety and depression as well as increases in well-being, but no changes in self-efficacy. Participants rated the system design and functionality positively and qualitative findings indicated high levels of satisfaction with MePlusMe.

Discussion: Findings support both the acceptability and the effectiveness of MePlusMe. Nonetheless, modest retention rates limit the precision and generalisability of these findings. Further investigation should ascertain optimal duration of engagement, most acceptable means of outcome assessment, and further detail about obstacles to utilisation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
期刊最新文献
Mental health literacy in secondary school teachers and interventions to improve it - a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Changes in sex differences in mental health over time: the moderating effects of educational status and loneliness. Statement of Retraction: Evaluation of the impact of a self-stigma reduction programme on psychosocial outcomes among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. The impact of social support on university students living with mental illness: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. The effectiveness of digital health technologies for reducing substance use among young people: a systematic review & meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1