利用大型保险理赔数据库中的匹配队列比较抗癫痫药物的疗效

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsy Research Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107313
Yoav kan-Tor , Lior Ness , Liran Szlak , Felix Benninger , Sivan Ravid , Michal Chorev , Michal Rosen-Zvi , Yishai Shimoni , Robert S. Fisher
{"title":"利用大型保险理赔数据库中的匹配队列比较抗癫痫药物的疗效","authors":"Yoav kan-Tor ,&nbsp;Lior Ness ,&nbsp;Liran Szlak ,&nbsp;Felix Benninger ,&nbsp;Sivan Ravid ,&nbsp;Michal Chorev ,&nbsp;Michal Rosen-Zvi ,&nbsp;Yishai Shimoni ,&nbsp;Robert S. Fisher","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Epilepsy is a severe chronic neurological disease affecting 60 million people worldwide. Primary treatment is with anti-seizure medicines (ASMs), but many patients continue to experience seizures. We used retrospective insurance claims data on 280,587 patients with uncontrolled epilepsy (UE), defined as status epilepticus, need for a rescue medicine, or admission or emergency visit for an epilepsy code. We conducted a computational risk ratio analysis between pairs of ASMs using a causal inference method, in order to match 1034 clinical factors and simulate randomization. Data was extracted from the MarketScan insurance claims Research Database records from 2011 to 2015.</p><p>The cohort consisted of individuals over 18 years old with a diagnosis of epilepsy who took one of eight ASMs and had more than a year of history prior to the filling of the drug prescription. Seven ASM exposures were analyzed: topiramate, phenytoin, levetiracetam, gabapentin, lamotrigine, valproate, and carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine (treated as the same exposure).</p><p>We calculated the risk ratio of UE between pairs of ASM after controlling for bias with inverse propensity weighting applied to 1034 factors, such as demographics, confounding illnesses, non-epileptic conditions treated by ASMs, etc. All ASMs exhibited a significant reduction in the prevalence of UE, but three drugs showed pair-wise differences compared to other ASMs. Topiramate consistently was associated with a lower risk of UE, with a mean risk ratio range of 0.68–0.93 (average 0.82, CI: 0.56–1.08). Phenytoin and levetiracetam were consistently associated with a higher risk of UE with mean risk ratio ranges of 1.11 to 1.47 (average 1.13, CI 0.98–1.65) and 1.15 to 1.43 (average 1.2, CI 0.72–1.69), respectively.</p><p>Large-scale retrospective insurance claims data - combined with causal inference analysis - provides an opportunity to compare the effect of treatments in real-world data in populations 1,000-fold larger than those in typical randomized trials. Our causal analysis identified the clinically unexpected finding of topiramate as being associated with a lower risk of UE; and phenytoin and levetiracetam as associated with a higher risk of UE (compared to other studied drugs, not to baseline). However, we note that our data set for this study only used insurance claims events, which does not comprise actual seizure frequencies, nor a clear picture of side effects. Our results do not advocate for any change in practice but demonstrate that conclusions from large databases may differ from and supplement those of randomized trials and clinical practice and therefore may guide further investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 107313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000287/pdfft?md5=4a97a7ccbaf0e9b02c3e01422270215b&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124000287-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the efficacy of anti-seizure medications using matched cohorts on a large insurance claims database\",\"authors\":\"Yoav kan-Tor ,&nbsp;Lior Ness ,&nbsp;Liran Szlak ,&nbsp;Felix Benninger ,&nbsp;Sivan Ravid ,&nbsp;Michal Chorev ,&nbsp;Michal Rosen-Zvi ,&nbsp;Yishai Shimoni ,&nbsp;Robert S. Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Epilepsy is a severe chronic neurological disease affecting 60 million people worldwide. Primary treatment is with anti-seizure medicines (ASMs), but many patients continue to experience seizures. We used retrospective insurance claims data on 280,587 patients with uncontrolled epilepsy (UE), defined as status epilepticus, need for a rescue medicine, or admission or emergency visit for an epilepsy code. We conducted a computational risk ratio analysis between pairs of ASMs using a causal inference method, in order to match 1034 clinical factors and simulate randomization. Data was extracted from the MarketScan insurance claims Research Database records from 2011 to 2015.</p><p>The cohort consisted of individuals over 18 years old with a diagnosis of epilepsy who took one of eight ASMs and had more than a year of history prior to the filling of the drug prescription. Seven ASM exposures were analyzed: topiramate, phenytoin, levetiracetam, gabapentin, lamotrigine, valproate, and carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine (treated as the same exposure).</p><p>We calculated the risk ratio of UE between pairs of ASM after controlling for bias with inverse propensity weighting applied to 1034 factors, such as demographics, confounding illnesses, non-epileptic conditions treated by ASMs, etc. All ASMs exhibited a significant reduction in the prevalence of UE, but three drugs showed pair-wise differences compared to other ASMs. Topiramate consistently was associated with a lower risk of UE, with a mean risk ratio range of 0.68–0.93 (average 0.82, CI: 0.56–1.08). Phenytoin and levetiracetam were consistently associated with a higher risk of UE with mean risk ratio ranges of 1.11 to 1.47 (average 1.13, CI 0.98–1.65) and 1.15 to 1.43 (average 1.2, CI 0.72–1.69), respectively.</p><p>Large-scale retrospective insurance claims data - combined with causal inference analysis - provides an opportunity to compare the effect of treatments in real-world data in populations 1,000-fold larger than those in typical randomized trials. Our causal analysis identified the clinically unexpected finding of topiramate as being associated with a lower risk of UE; and phenytoin and levetiracetam as associated with a higher risk of UE (compared to other studied drugs, not to baseline). However, we note that our data set for this study only used insurance claims events, which does not comprise actual seizure frequencies, nor a clear picture of side effects. Our results do not advocate for any change in practice but demonstrate that conclusions from large databases may differ from and supplement those of randomized trials and clinical practice and therefore may guide further investigation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy Research\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000287/pdfft?md5=4a97a7ccbaf0e9b02c3e01422270215b&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124000287-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000287\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癫痫是一种严重的慢性神经系统疾病,影响着全球 6000 万人。主要治疗方法是服用抗癫痫药物(ASMs),但许多患者仍会出现癫痫发作。我们使用了 280,587 名未受控制的癫痫(UE)患者的回顾性保险理赔数据,UE 的定义是癫痫状态、需要服用抢救药物或因癫痫代码入院或急诊就诊。我们使用因果推理方法对 ASM 进行了计算风险比分析,以匹配 1034 个临床因素并模拟随机化。数据提取自2011年至2015年的MarketScan保险理赔研究数据库记录。队列由18岁以上确诊为癫痫的个人组成,他们服用了八种ASM中的一种,并且在开药前有一年以上的病史。我们对以下七种ASM暴露进行了分析:托吡酯、苯妥英、左乙拉西坦、加巴喷丁、拉莫三嗪、丙戊酸钠、卡马西平或奥卡西平(作为同一暴露处理)。在对人口统计学、混杂疾病、ASM治疗的非癫痫疾病等1034个因素进行反倾向加权控制偏倚后,我们计算了成对ASM之间UE的风险比。所有 ASM 均能显著降低 UE 患病率,但有三种药物与其他 ASM 相比存在配对差异。托吡酯始终与较低的 UE 风险相关,平均风险比范围为 0.68-0.93(平均 0.82,CI:0.56-1.08)。苯妥英和左乙拉西坦始终与较高的UE风险相关,平均风险比范围分别为1.11-1.47(平均1.13,CI 0.98-1.65)和1.15-1.43(平均1.2,CI 0.72-1.69)。大规模回顾性保险理赔数据--结合因果推理分析--为比较现实世界数据中治疗效果提供了机会,这些数据的研究人群比典型随机试验的研究人群大1000倍。我们的因果分析发现,托吡酯与较低的 UE 风险相关,而苯妥英和左乙拉西坦与较高的 UE 风险相关(与其他研究药物相比,而非与基线相比),这一结果出乎临床意料。不过,我们注意到,本研究的数据集仅使用了保险理赔事件,并不包括实际的癫痫发作频率,也不能清楚地反映副作用。我们的研究结果并不主张改变任何做法,但表明大型数据库的结论可能不同于随机试验和临床实践的结论,也可能是对随机试验和临床实践结论的补充,因此可以指导进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the efficacy of anti-seizure medications using matched cohorts on a large insurance claims database

Epilepsy is a severe chronic neurological disease affecting 60 million people worldwide. Primary treatment is with anti-seizure medicines (ASMs), but many patients continue to experience seizures. We used retrospective insurance claims data on 280,587 patients with uncontrolled epilepsy (UE), defined as status epilepticus, need for a rescue medicine, or admission or emergency visit for an epilepsy code. We conducted a computational risk ratio analysis between pairs of ASMs using a causal inference method, in order to match 1034 clinical factors and simulate randomization. Data was extracted from the MarketScan insurance claims Research Database records from 2011 to 2015.

The cohort consisted of individuals over 18 years old with a diagnosis of epilepsy who took one of eight ASMs and had more than a year of history prior to the filling of the drug prescription. Seven ASM exposures were analyzed: topiramate, phenytoin, levetiracetam, gabapentin, lamotrigine, valproate, and carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine (treated as the same exposure).

We calculated the risk ratio of UE between pairs of ASM after controlling for bias with inverse propensity weighting applied to 1034 factors, such as demographics, confounding illnesses, non-epileptic conditions treated by ASMs, etc. All ASMs exhibited a significant reduction in the prevalence of UE, but three drugs showed pair-wise differences compared to other ASMs. Topiramate consistently was associated with a lower risk of UE, with a mean risk ratio range of 0.68–0.93 (average 0.82, CI: 0.56–1.08). Phenytoin and levetiracetam were consistently associated with a higher risk of UE with mean risk ratio ranges of 1.11 to 1.47 (average 1.13, CI 0.98–1.65) and 1.15 to 1.43 (average 1.2, CI 0.72–1.69), respectively.

Large-scale retrospective insurance claims data - combined with causal inference analysis - provides an opportunity to compare the effect of treatments in real-world data in populations 1,000-fold larger than those in typical randomized trials. Our causal analysis identified the clinically unexpected finding of topiramate as being associated with a lower risk of UE; and phenytoin and levetiracetam as associated with a higher risk of UE (compared to other studied drugs, not to baseline). However, we note that our data set for this study only used insurance claims events, which does not comprise actual seizure frequencies, nor a clear picture of side effects. Our results do not advocate for any change in practice but demonstrate that conclusions from large databases may differ from and supplement those of randomized trials and clinical practice and therefore may guide further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Cannabis use, sleep and mood disturbances among persons with epilepsy – A clinical and polysomnography study from a Canadian tertiary care epilepsy center Evaluating the late seizures of acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion via monitoring using continuous electroencephalogram Validation of hemispherectomy outcome prediction scale in treatment of medically intractable epilepsy MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers of response to modified Atkins diet in treatment of adults with drug-resistant epilepsy: A proof-of-concept study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1