评估主观视觉垂直可靠性:水桶测试"、移动应用程序和虚拟系统的比较

Mohammed Waly, Fahad Alshammari, Maryam E. Alshammari, Mohammed Algahtany
{"title":"评估主观视觉垂直可靠性:水桶测试\"、移动应用程序和虚拟系统的比较","authors":"Mohammed Waly, Fahad Alshammari, Maryam E. Alshammari, Mohammed Algahtany","doi":"10.3991/ijoe.v20i02.45981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subjective visual vertical (SVV) is a potential indicator of vestibular dysfunction as it assesses an individual’s perception of a vertical line. Despite this, and as a result of specific logistical impediments, SVV has not entered standard clinical practice. Dizziness is the third most common clinical complaint by patients (20%) in outpatient offices. It adversely affects the patient’s life and is often accompanied by intensive healthcare. This study aims to determine whether the bucket test and mobile phone app are as reliable as the Virtual SVV system in assessing the SVV. This study involves four types of investigation to determine the relationship or difference among three tests, including their performance comparison, descriptive analysis, one-way ANOVA test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and correlation analysis. After organizing the raw data from 207 healthy volunteer participants for 8 trials, it was found that 59% were female and 41% were male. The data was analyzed utilizing the SPSS program. The test performance is measured using the ROC curve, and the results indicate that the bucket with the highest ROC coefficient is 0.72.","PeriodicalId":507997,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Subjective Visual Vertical Reliability: A Comparison of the “Bucket Test,” a Mobile App, and a Virtual System\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Waly, Fahad Alshammari, Maryam E. Alshammari, Mohammed Algahtany\",\"doi\":\"10.3991/ijoe.v20i02.45981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subjective visual vertical (SVV) is a potential indicator of vestibular dysfunction as it assesses an individual’s perception of a vertical line. Despite this, and as a result of specific logistical impediments, SVV has not entered standard clinical practice. Dizziness is the third most common clinical complaint by patients (20%) in outpatient offices. It adversely affects the patient’s life and is often accompanied by intensive healthcare. This study aims to determine whether the bucket test and mobile phone app are as reliable as the Virtual SVV system in assessing the SVV. This study involves four types of investigation to determine the relationship or difference among three tests, including their performance comparison, descriptive analysis, one-way ANOVA test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and correlation analysis. After organizing the raw data from 207 healthy volunteer participants for 8 trials, it was found that 59% were female and 41% were male. The data was analyzed utilizing the SPSS program. The test performance is measured using the ROC curve, and the results indicate that the bucket with the highest ROC coefficient is 0.72.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v20i02.45981\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v20i02.45981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主观视觉垂直度(SVV)是前庭功能障碍的一个潜在指标,因为它评估的是个人对垂直线的感知。尽管如此,由于特定的后勤障碍,SVV 尚未进入标准临床实践。头晕是门诊患者第三大常见的临床主诉(20%)。它对患者的生活造成了不利影响,而且往往伴随着密集的医疗服务。本研究旨在确定水桶测试和手机应用在评估 SVV 方面是否与虚拟 SVV 系统一样可靠。本研究通过四种类型的调查来确定三种测试之间的关系或差异,包括它们的性能比较、描述性分析、单因素方差分析、接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)和相关性分析。在整理了 207 名健康志愿者参加 8 次试验的原始数据后,发现 59% 为女性,41% 为男性。数据使用 SPSS 程序进行分析。使用 ROC 曲线衡量测试性能,结果表明 ROC 系数最高的桶为 0.72。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing Subjective Visual Vertical Reliability: A Comparison of the “Bucket Test,” a Mobile App, and a Virtual System
The subjective visual vertical (SVV) is a potential indicator of vestibular dysfunction as it assesses an individual’s perception of a vertical line. Despite this, and as a result of specific logistical impediments, SVV has not entered standard clinical practice. Dizziness is the third most common clinical complaint by patients (20%) in outpatient offices. It adversely affects the patient’s life and is often accompanied by intensive healthcare. This study aims to determine whether the bucket test and mobile phone app are as reliable as the Virtual SVV system in assessing the SVV. This study involves four types of investigation to determine the relationship or difference among three tests, including their performance comparison, descriptive analysis, one-way ANOVA test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and correlation analysis. After organizing the raw data from 207 healthy volunteer participants for 8 trials, it was found that 59% were female and 41% were male. The data was analyzed utilizing the SPSS program. The test performance is measured using the ROC curve, and the results indicate that the bucket with the highest ROC coefficient is 0.72.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
XAI-PhD: Fortifying Trust of Phishing URL Detection Empowered by Shapley Additive Explanations Improving the Accuracy of Oncology Diagnosis: A Machine Learning-Based Approach to Cancer Prediction Social Robots, Mindfulness, and Kindergarten Blockchain of Things for Securing and Managing Water 4.0 Applications Intelligent Interconnected Healthcare System: Integrating IoT and Big Data for Personalized Patient Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1