帝国身体的守护者:作为帝国民族主义企业家的俄罗斯地理学会

A. Curanović
{"title":"帝国身体的守护者:作为帝国民族主义企业家的俄罗斯地理学会","authors":"A. Curanović","doi":"10.1017/nps.2024.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The goal of this article is to show Russia’s civilizational turn in the broader context of imperial nationalism. The “turn” is a manifestation of imperial nationalism that today feeds not only on political ideas and history but also on geography. In the mass perception, geography is seen as an objective, non-ideologized scientific discipline less prone to political manipulation. Because of this, it can be employed to influence the Russian self-identification process in a much more subtle and efficient way than references to the more abstract notion of civilization. This article presents the Russian Geographical Society (RGS) as an identity entrepreneur managed by the ruling elite with a well-developed regional structure. It functions as a community of imperial practice. With its discursive and material practices, the RGS contributes to reproducing imperial nationalism, including in its civilizational version. The RGS is the keeper of the imperial body. By referring to the imperial body, I mean not just the physical territory but also the ways it is imagined in discourse and made material in numerous practices.","PeriodicalId":508038,"journal":{"name":"Nationalities Papers","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Keeper of the Imperial Body: The Russian Geographical Society as an Entrepreneur of Imperial Nationalism\",\"authors\":\"A. Curanović\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/nps.2024.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The goal of this article is to show Russia’s civilizational turn in the broader context of imperial nationalism. The “turn” is a manifestation of imperial nationalism that today feeds not only on political ideas and history but also on geography. In the mass perception, geography is seen as an objective, non-ideologized scientific discipline less prone to political manipulation. Because of this, it can be employed to influence the Russian self-identification process in a much more subtle and efficient way than references to the more abstract notion of civilization. This article presents the Russian Geographical Society (RGS) as an identity entrepreneur managed by the ruling elite with a well-developed regional structure. It functions as a community of imperial practice. With its discursive and material practices, the RGS contributes to reproducing imperial nationalism, including in its civilizational version. The RGS is the keeper of the imperial body. By referring to the imperial body, I mean not just the physical territory but also the ways it is imagined in discourse and made material in numerous practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nationalities Papers\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nationalities Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2024.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nationalities Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2024.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在从帝国民族主义的大背景下展示俄罗斯的文明转向。这种 "转向 "是帝国民族主义的一种表现形式,如今它不仅依赖于政治思想和历史,也依赖于地理学。在大众的观念中,地理学被视为一门客观的、非意识形态化的科学学科,不易受到政治操纵。正因为如此,地理学可以比更抽象的文明概念更微妙、更有效地影响俄罗斯的自我认同过程。本文将俄罗斯地理学会(RGS)描述为一个由统治精英管理的身份企业家,拥有发达的地区结构。它发挥着帝国实践社区的作用。通过其话语和物质实践,俄罗斯地理学会促进了帝国民族主义的再现,包括其文明版本。区域政府组织是帝国身体的守护者。我所说的 "帝国躯体 "不仅指实际的领土,还包括在话语中对它的想象以及在众多实践中将它物质化的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Keeper of the Imperial Body: The Russian Geographical Society as an Entrepreneur of Imperial Nationalism
The goal of this article is to show Russia’s civilizational turn in the broader context of imperial nationalism. The “turn” is a manifestation of imperial nationalism that today feeds not only on political ideas and history but also on geography. In the mass perception, geography is seen as an objective, non-ideologized scientific discipline less prone to political manipulation. Because of this, it can be employed to influence the Russian self-identification process in a much more subtle and efficient way than references to the more abstract notion of civilization. This article presents the Russian Geographical Society (RGS) as an identity entrepreneur managed by the ruling elite with a well-developed regional structure. It functions as a community of imperial practice. With its discursive and material practices, the RGS contributes to reproducing imperial nationalism, including in its civilizational version. The RGS is the keeper of the imperial body. By referring to the imperial body, I mean not just the physical territory but also the ways it is imagined in discourse and made material in numerous practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Presidential Discourses on Regionalism in Azerbaijan: Turkic Solidarity and the Silk Road Response to Comments on Estate Origins of Democracy in Russia Artistic Forms of Shaping Ukrainian National Identity by Leon Getz Promoting Justice across Borders: The Ethics of Reform Intervention, by Lucia Rafanelli, New York: Oxford University Press, 2021, 280 pp., $86 (hardback), ISBN 9780197568842, $39.95 (paperback), ISBN 9780197770566. Great Power Competition, Clientelism, and De Facto States: Transnistria and Taiwan Compared
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1