改善患者安全:从报告的医院获得性压疮中学习

Anthony Octo Forkuo-Minka, Augustine Kumah, Afua Yeboaa Asomaning
{"title":"改善患者安全:从报告的医院获得性压疮中学习","authors":"Anthony Octo Forkuo-Minka, Augustine Kumah, Afua Yeboaa Asomaning","doi":"10.36401/jqsh-23-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n A hospital-acquired pressure ulcer (HAPU) is a localized lesion or injury to the underlying tissue (wound) while the patient is on admission. It occurs when standardized nursing care is not correctly followed in the presence of friction and shear, leading to skin or underlying tissue breakdown. Unfortunately, inadequate knowledge of nurses to assess and provide standardized care for pressure ulcers or manage HAPUs results in patient harm. We aim to share lessons from a reported HAPU incident and address the knowledge gap in patient safety risk assessment, identification, and wound management at Nyaho Medical Centre (Accra, Ghana).\n \n \n \n A review of HAPU incidents was conducted using quality improvement tools such as cause-and-effect analyses to identify contributing factors and root causes. Subsequently, plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were used to test interventions to improve pressure ulcer assessments and wound management. A run chart was used to analyze and evaluate the interventions over 12 weeks (Aug–Oct 2021).\n \n \n \n Development of policies and a standard operating procedure for pressure ulcers and wounds improved accuracy in identifying pressure ulcer risks and management of wounds. Eighty-three patients were assessed with the pressure ulcer assessment tool. Complete (100%) adherence to the pressure ulcer and wound policy and standard operating procedure (SOP) was achieved, and the number of HAPUs decreased from five to one during the study period.\n \n \n \n This study demonstrated that the combined use of quality methods and tools can be suitable for improving processes and outcomes for patients at risk for HAPUs.\n","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":"5 3-4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Patient Safety: Learning from Reported Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Octo Forkuo-Minka, Augustine Kumah, Afua Yeboaa Asomaning\",\"doi\":\"10.36401/jqsh-23-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n A hospital-acquired pressure ulcer (HAPU) is a localized lesion or injury to the underlying tissue (wound) while the patient is on admission. It occurs when standardized nursing care is not correctly followed in the presence of friction and shear, leading to skin or underlying tissue breakdown. Unfortunately, inadequate knowledge of nurses to assess and provide standardized care for pressure ulcers or manage HAPUs results in patient harm. We aim to share lessons from a reported HAPU incident and address the knowledge gap in patient safety risk assessment, identification, and wound management at Nyaho Medical Centre (Accra, Ghana).\\n \\n \\n \\n A review of HAPU incidents was conducted using quality improvement tools such as cause-and-effect analyses to identify contributing factors and root causes. Subsequently, plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were used to test interventions to improve pressure ulcer assessments and wound management. A run chart was used to analyze and evaluate the interventions over 12 weeks (Aug–Oct 2021).\\n \\n \\n \\n Development of policies and a standard operating procedure for pressure ulcers and wounds improved accuracy in identifying pressure ulcer risks and management of wounds. Eighty-three patients were assessed with the pressure ulcer assessment tool. Complete (100%) adherence to the pressure ulcer and wound policy and standard operating procedure (SOP) was achieved, and the number of HAPUs decreased from five to one during the study period.\\n \\n \\n \\n This study demonstrated that the combined use of quality methods and tools can be suitable for improving processes and outcomes for patients at risk for HAPUs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":73170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"volume\":\"5 3-4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36401/jqsh-23-25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/jqsh-23-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医院获得性压疮(HAPU)是指病人在入院时出现的局部病变或下层组织(伤口)损伤。当存在摩擦力和剪切力时,如果没有正确遵循标准化护理,就会导致皮肤或下层组织破损。遗憾的是,护士对压疮的评估和标准化护理或 HAPU 的管理知识不足,导致了对患者的伤害。我们旨在分享 Nyaho 医疗中心(加纳阿克拉)发生的一起压疮事件的教训,并解决患者安全风险评估、识别和伤口管理方面的知识缺口。 我们使用质量改进工具(如因果分析)对 HAPU 事件进行了审查,以确定促成因素和根本原因。随后,利用计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)循环测试干预措施,以改进压疮评估和伤口管理。使用运行图对 12 周内(2021 年 8 月至 10 月)的干预措施进行分析和评估。 压疮和伤口政策及标准操作程序的制定提高了压疮风险识别和伤口管理的准确性。使用压疮评估工具对 83 名患者进行了评估。在研究期间,压疮和伤口政策及标准操作程序(SOP)得到了完全(100%)的遵守,HAPU 数量从 5 例减少到 1 例。 这项研究表明,结合使用质量方法和工具,可以有效改善高危 HAPU 患者的治疗流程和效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving Patient Safety: Learning from Reported Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers
A hospital-acquired pressure ulcer (HAPU) is a localized lesion or injury to the underlying tissue (wound) while the patient is on admission. It occurs when standardized nursing care is not correctly followed in the presence of friction and shear, leading to skin or underlying tissue breakdown. Unfortunately, inadequate knowledge of nurses to assess and provide standardized care for pressure ulcers or manage HAPUs results in patient harm. We aim to share lessons from a reported HAPU incident and address the knowledge gap in patient safety risk assessment, identification, and wound management at Nyaho Medical Centre (Accra, Ghana). A review of HAPU incidents was conducted using quality improvement tools such as cause-and-effect analyses to identify contributing factors and root causes. Subsequently, plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were used to test interventions to improve pressure ulcer assessments and wound management. A run chart was used to analyze and evaluate the interventions over 12 weeks (Aug–Oct 2021). Development of policies and a standard operating procedure for pressure ulcers and wounds improved accuracy in identifying pressure ulcer risks and management of wounds. Eighty-three patients were assessed with the pressure ulcer assessment tool. Complete (100%) adherence to the pressure ulcer and wound policy and standard operating procedure (SOP) was achieved, and the number of HAPUs decreased from five to one during the study period. This study demonstrated that the combined use of quality methods and tools can be suitable for improving processes and outcomes for patients at risk for HAPUs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Group Antenatal Care Start-Up in the Indian Private Sector: An Implementation Journey to Improve Quality of Care. Accreditation Made Easy: Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Institutions. Summary of the 5th International Pharmacoeconomics Forum. Community Health Needs Assessment of Primary Healthcare in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Prescribing Errors in an Ambulatory Care Setting: Mitigating Risks in Outpatient Medication Orders, Cross-Sectional Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1