不同几何形状龋洞的上颌前磨牙用掺入壳聚糖纳米颗粒的不同复合树脂修复后的抗断裂性评估

Rahul S Halkai, S. Gopinagaruri, Kiran R Halkai
{"title":"不同几何形状龋洞的上颌前磨牙用掺入壳聚糖纳米颗粒的不同复合树脂修复后的抗断裂性评估","authors":"Rahul S Halkai, S. Gopinagaruri, Kiran R Halkai","doi":"10.4103/jcde.jcde_264_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Composites with 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles (CSN) are used recently; however, this combination needs to be studied in different cavity designs.\n \n \n \n The aim of the study was to compare the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with different cavity geometries restored with different types of composite resins incorporated with 0.2% CSN.\n \n \n \n About 130 extracted human single-rooted maxillary premolars were embedded in acrylic molds 2 mm below cementoenamel junction, divided into five groups for cavity preparations of standardized dimensions. Group 1: (control) intact teeth (n = 10), Group 2: Class I cavities (n = 40), Group 3: Class II mesio-occlusal (MO) (n = 40), Group 4: Class II mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) (n = 40). Groups 2, 3, and 4 were subdivided into four subgroups for composite restoration; A: Neo spectra ST-Universal (NST); B: Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill (TNC); C: NST + CSN; and D: TNC + CSN and tested for fracture resistance using universal testing machine.\n \n \n \n One-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey’s tests were used for data analysis (P ≤ 0.05).\n \n \n \n In all groups, the highest fracture resistance was found in MOD cavities, followed by MO and least in Class I cavities. Subgroup D (TNC with CSN) showed the highest fracture resistance in all groups (P ≤ 0.05).\n \n \n \n Tetric N-Ceramic bulk fill with 0.25% CSN showed high fracture resistance in cavities with different geometries.\n","PeriodicalId":516572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of fracture resistance of maxillary premolars of different geometrical cavities restored with different composite resins incorporated with chitosan nanoparticles\",\"authors\":\"Rahul S Halkai, S. Gopinagaruri, Kiran R Halkai\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcde.jcde_264_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Composites with 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles (CSN) are used recently; however, this combination needs to be studied in different cavity designs.\\n \\n \\n \\n The aim of the study was to compare the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with different cavity geometries restored with different types of composite resins incorporated with 0.2% CSN.\\n \\n \\n \\n About 130 extracted human single-rooted maxillary premolars were embedded in acrylic molds 2 mm below cementoenamel junction, divided into five groups for cavity preparations of standardized dimensions. Group 1: (control) intact teeth (n = 10), Group 2: Class I cavities (n = 40), Group 3: Class II mesio-occlusal (MO) (n = 40), Group 4: Class II mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) (n = 40). Groups 2, 3, and 4 were subdivided into four subgroups for composite restoration; A: Neo spectra ST-Universal (NST); B: Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill (TNC); C: NST + CSN; and D: TNC + CSN and tested for fracture resistance using universal testing machine.\\n \\n \\n \\n One-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey’s tests were used for data analysis (P ≤ 0.05).\\n \\n \\n \\n In all groups, the highest fracture resistance was found in MOD cavities, followed by MO and least in Class I cavities. Subgroup D (TNC with CSN) showed the highest fracture resistance in all groups (P ≤ 0.05).\\n \\n \\n \\n Tetric N-Ceramic bulk fill with 0.25% CSN showed high fracture resistance in cavities with different geometries.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":516572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcde.jcde_264_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcde.jcde_264_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

壳聚糖纳米颗粒(CSN)含量为0.2%的复合树脂最近得到了应用,但这种组合需要在不同的牙洞设计中进行研究。 本研究的目的是比较用含有 0.2% CSN 的不同类型复合树脂修复的不同牙洞几何形状的上颌前磨牙的抗折性。 将大约 130 颗拔出的人类单根上颌前磨牙嵌入牙本质釉质交界处下 2 mm 的丙烯酸模具中,分成五组进行标准化尺寸的牙洞制备。第 1 组:(对照组)完整牙齿(n = 10),第 2 组:I 类龋洞(n = 40第一类龋齿(n = 40),第三类龋齿(n = 40),第四类龋齿(n = 40)。将第 2、3 和 4 组细分为 A:Neo spectra ST-Universal (NST);B:Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill (TNC);C:NST + CSN;D:TNC + CSN 四个复合材料修复亚组,并使用万能试验机进行抗折性测试。 数据分析采用单因素方差分析和事后 Tukey 检验(P ≤ 0.05)。 在所有组别中,MOD牙洞的抗折性最高,其次是MO牙洞,而I类牙洞的抗折性最低。在所有组别中,D亚组(TNC与CSN)的抗断裂性最高(P≤0.05)。 含有 0.25% CSN 的 Tetric N-Ceramic 体积填充物在不同几何形状的龋洞中显示出较高的抗折性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of fracture resistance of maxillary premolars of different geometrical cavities restored with different composite resins incorporated with chitosan nanoparticles
Composites with 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles (CSN) are used recently; however, this combination needs to be studied in different cavity designs. The aim of the study was to compare the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with different cavity geometries restored with different types of composite resins incorporated with 0.2% CSN. About 130 extracted human single-rooted maxillary premolars were embedded in acrylic molds 2 mm below cementoenamel junction, divided into five groups for cavity preparations of standardized dimensions. Group 1: (control) intact teeth (n = 10), Group 2: Class I cavities (n = 40), Group 3: Class II mesio-occlusal (MO) (n = 40), Group 4: Class II mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) (n = 40). Groups 2, 3, and 4 were subdivided into four subgroups for composite restoration; A: Neo spectra ST-Universal (NST); B: Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill (TNC); C: NST + CSN; and D: TNC + CSN and tested for fracture resistance using universal testing machine. One-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey’s tests were used for data analysis (P ≤ 0.05). In all groups, the highest fracture resistance was found in MOD cavities, followed by MO and least in Class I cavities. Subgroup D (TNC with CSN) showed the highest fracture resistance in all groups (P ≤ 0.05). Tetric N-Ceramic bulk fill with 0.25% CSN showed high fracture resistance in cavities with different geometries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation of incorporation of ferrule in premolars endocrown designs to check any alterations in their fracture resistance: A pilot study Effect of blood and artificial saliva contamination on marginal adaptation and sealing ability of different retrograde filling materials: A comparative analysis Enriched advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus gold nanoparticles against Enterococcus faecalis for its potential use in revascularization for necrotic immature permanent teeth Does increase in temperature of sodium hypochlorite have enhanced antimicrobial efficacy and tissue dissolution property? – A systematic review and meta-regression An in vitro comparative evaluation of efficiency of three rotary nickel–titanium file systems in terms of remaining dentin thickness using cone-beam computed tomography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1