在流式细胞仪 HLA-B27 免疫分型中观察到抗 HLA-B7/HLA-B44 强交叉免疫反应。

IF 2.5 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Cytometry Part A Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1002/cyto.a.24824
Fabien Francois, Louis Waeckel, Anne-Emmanuelle Berger, Claude Lambert
{"title":"在流式细胞仪 HLA-B27 免疫分型中观察到抗 HLA-B7/HLA-B44 强交叉免疫反应。","authors":"Fabien Francois,&nbsp;Louis Waeckel,&nbsp;Anne-Emmanuelle Berger,&nbsp;Claude Lambert","doi":"10.1002/cyto.a.24824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cross reactivities are known for human leukocyte antigen inside HLA-B7 related Cross-Reactive Group (B7CREG). Some CE-IVD flow-cytometry kits use double monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to distinguish HLA-B27 and HLA-B7 but practice reveals more complexes results. This study explores the performances of this test. Analysis of 466 consecutive cases using HLA-B27 IOTest™ kit on a Navios™ cytometer from Beckman-Coulter, partially compared to their genotypes. Expected haplotypes HLA-B27-/HLA-B7- (undoubtedly HLA-B27 negative) and HLA-B27+/HLA-B7- (undoubtedly HLA-B27+) were clearly identified according to the manufacturer's instructions. On the opposite, patients strongly labeled with anti-HLA-B7 showed three different phenotypes regarding anti-HLA-B27 labeling: (1) most of the cases were poorly labeled in accordance with cross reactivity inside B7CREG (HLA-B27-/HLA-B7+ haplotype); (2) rare cases had strong B7 and B27 labeling corresponding to HLA-B27+/HLA-B7+ haplotype; (3) even less cases had strong labeling by anti-HLA-B7 but non for anti-HLA-B27, all expressing HLA-B44 and no B7CREG molecules. Surprisingly, more cases were not labeled with anti-HLA-B7 antibody but partially labeled with anti-HLA-B27 suggesting another cross reactivity out of B7CREG. mAb HLA typing suggests new, cross reactivities of anti-HLA-B27 antibody to more molecules out of B7CREG and of anti-HLA-B7 antibody but not anti-HLA-B27 to HLA-B44 molecule also out of B7CREG. HLA-B27 could surely be excluded in most samples labeled with HLA-B27, below a “grey zone” on intermediate intensity. More comparison is needed in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11068,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part A","volume":"105 5","pages":"376-381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-HLA-B7/HLA-B44 strong cross immunoreactivity observed in flow cytometry HLA-B27 immunotyping\",\"authors\":\"Fabien Francois,&nbsp;Louis Waeckel,&nbsp;Anne-Emmanuelle Berger,&nbsp;Claude Lambert\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cyto.a.24824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cross reactivities are known for human leukocyte antigen inside HLA-B7 related Cross-Reactive Group (B7CREG). Some CE-IVD flow-cytometry kits use double monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to distinguish HLA-B27 and HLA-B7 but practice reveals more complexes results. This study explores the performances of this test. Analysis of 466 consecutive cases using HLA-B27 IOTest™ kit on a Navios™ cytometer from Beckman-Coulter, partially compared to their genotypes. Expected haplotypes HLA-B27-/HLA-B7- (undoubtedly HLA-B27 negative) and HLA-B27+/HLA-B7- (undoubtedly HLA-B27+) were clearly identified according to the manufacturer's instructions. On the opposite, patients strongly labeled with anti-HLA-B7 showed three different phenotypes regarding anti-HLA-B27 labeling: (1) most of the cases were poorly labeled in accordance with cross reactivity inside B7CREG (HLA-B27-/HLA-B7+ haplotype); (2) rare cases had strong B7 and B27 labeling corresponding to HLA-B27+/HLA-B7+ haplotype; (3) even less cases had strong labeling by anti-HLA-B7 but non for anti-HLA-B27, all expressing HLA-B44 and no B7CREG molecules. Surprisingly, more cases were not labeled with anti-HLA-B7 antibody but partially labeled with anti-HLA-B27 suggesting another cross reactivity out of B7CREG. mAb HLA typing suggests new, cross reactivities of anti-HLA-B27 antibody to more molecules out of B7CREG and of anti-HLA-B7 antibody but not anti-HLA-B27 to HLA-B44 molecule also out of B7CREG. HLA-B27 could surely be excluded in most samples labeled with HLA-B27, below a “grey zone” on intermediate intensity. More comparison is needed in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cytometry Part A\",\"volume\":\"105 5\",\"pages\":\"376-381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cytometry Part A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.a.24824\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.a.24824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已知 HLA-B7 相关交叉反应组(B7CREG)内的人类白细胞抗原存在交叉反应。一些 CE-IVD 流式细胞计数试剂盒使用双单克隆抗体(mAb)来区分 HLA-B27 和 HLA-B7,但在实践中发现结果更为复杂。本研究探讨了这种检测方法的性能。使用贝克曼-库尔特公司生产的 Navios™ 细胞分析仪上的 HLA-B27 IOTest™ 试剂盒对 466 个连续病例进行分析,并与他们的基因型进行部分比较。根据制造商的说明,HLA-B27-/HLA-B7-(无疑是 HLA-B27 阴性)和 HLA-B27+/HLA-B7- (无疑是 HLA-B27+)的预期单倍型已被清楚地识别出来。相反,抗-HLA-B7 强标记的患者在抗-HLA-B27 标记方面表现出三种不同的表型:(1)大多数病例的标记效果较差,与 B7CREG 内的交叉反应有关(HLA-B27-/HLA-B7+ 单倍型);(2)极少数病例的 B7 和 B27 标记效果较强,与 HLA-B27+/HLA-B7+ 单倍型有关;(3)抗 HLA-B7 标记效果较强而抗 HLA-B27 标记效果较弱的病例更少,所有病例都表达 HLA-B44,没有 B7CREG 分子。mAb HLA分型表明,抗-HLA-B27抗体与更多的B7CREG分子有交叉反应,抗-HLA-B7抗体与HLA-B44分子有交叉反应,而抗-HLA-B27抗体与B7CREG分子无交叉反应。在大多数标有 HLA-B27 的样本中,HLA-B27 肯定是可以被排除的,它低于中间强度的 "灰色区域"。今后的研究需要进行更多的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anti-HLA-B7/HLA-B44 strong cross immunoreactivity observed in flow cytometry HLA-B27 immunotyping

Cross reactivities are known for human leukocyte antigen inside HLA-B7 related Cross-Reactive Group (B7CREG). Some CE-IVD flow-cytometry kits use double monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to distinguish HLA-B27 and HLA-B7 but practice reveals more complexes results. This study explores the performances of this test. Analysis of 466 consecutive cases using HLA-B27 IOTest™ kit on a Navios™ cytometer from Beckman-Coulter, partially compared to their genotypes. Expected haplotypes HLA-B27-/HLA-B7- (undoubtedly HLA-B27 negative) and HLA-B27+/HLA-B7- (undoubtedly HLA-B27+) were clearly identified according to the manufacturer's instructions. On the opposite, patients strongly labeled with anti-HLA-B7 showed three different phenotypes regarding anti-HLA-B27 labeling: (1) most of the cases were poorly labeled in accordance with cross reactivity inside B7CREG (HLA-B27-/HLA-B7+ haplotype); (2) rare cases had strong B7 and B27 labeling corresponding to HLA-B27+/HLA-B7+ haplotype; (3) even less cases had strong labeling by anti-HLA-B7 but non for anti-HLA-B27, all expressing HLA-B44 and no B7CREG molecules. Surprisingly, more cases were not labeled with anti-HLA-B7 antibody but partially labeled with anti-HLA-B27 suggesting another cross reactivity out of B7CREG. mAb HLA typing suggests new, cross reactivities of anti-HLA-B27 antibody to more molecules out of B7CREG and of anti-HLA-B7 antibody but not anti-HLA-B27 to HLA-B44 molecule also out of B7CREG. HLA-B27 could surely be excluded in most samples labeled with HLA-B27, below a “grey zone” on intermediate intensity. More comparison is needed in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cytometry Part A
Cytometry Part A 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part A, the journal of quantitative single-cell analysis, features original research reports and reviews of innovative scientific studies employing quantitative single-cell measurement, separation, manipulation, and modeling techniques, as well as original articles on mechanisms of molecular and cellular functions obtained by cytometry techniques. The journal welcomes submissions from multiple research fields that fully embrace the study of the cytome: Biomedical Instrumentation Engineering Biophotonics Bioinformatics Cell Biology Computational Biology Data Science Immunology Parasitology Microbiology Neuroscience Cancer Stem Cells Tissue Regeneration.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC Volume 105A, Number 12, December 2024 Cover Image Autofluorescence lifetime flow cytometry rapidly flows from strength to strength. Flow cytometry-based method to detect and separate Mycoplasma hyorhinis in cell cultures. The consequence of mismatched buffers in purity checks when spectral cell sorting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1