创新绩效不足对企业在探索性创新和开发性创新之间权衡的影响:公司治理因素是否重要?

IF 3.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Engineering and Technology Management Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101801
Ge Ren , Ping Zeng , Xi Zhong
{"title":"创新绩效不足对企业在探索性创新和开发性创新之间权衡的影响:公司治理因素是否重要?","authors":"Ge Ren ,&nbsp;Ping Zeng ,&nbsp;Xi Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Whether and when innovation performance shortfall (innovation performance below innovation aspiration) affects firms’ trade-offs between exploratory and exploitative innovation remains an important unexplored question. Based on insights from behavioral theory of the firm and agency theory, we propose that as the innovation performance shortfall widens, firms will devote more resources to exploratory innovation rather than to exploitative innovation. That is, innovation performance shortfall positively affects firms’ relative exploratory innovation emphasis. Furthermore, we propose that board monitoring capacity and analyst coverage enhance the positive effect of innovation performance shortfall on firms’ relative exploratory innovation emphasis. Using data on Chinese listed companies from 2008 to 2020, we obtain empirical evidence supporting most of the above theoretical views.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 101801"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of innovation performance shortfall on firms’ trade-offs between exploratory and exploitative innovation: Do corporate governance factors matterʔ\",\"authors\":\"Ge Ren ,&nbsp;Ping Zeng ,&nbsp;Xi Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Whether and when innovation performance shortfall (innovation performance below innovation aspiration) affects firms’ trade-offs between exploratory and exploitative innovation remains an important unexplored question. Based on insights from behavioral theory of the firm and agency theory, we propose that as the innovation performance shortfall widens, firms will devote more resources to exploratory innovation rather than to exploitative innovation. That is, innovation performance shortfall positively affects firms’ relative exploratory innovation emphasis. Furthermore, we propose that board monitoring capacity and analyst coverage enhance the positive effect of innovation performance shortfall on firms’ relative exploratory innovation emphasis. Using data on Chinese listed companies from 2008 to 2020, we obtain empirical evidence supporting most of the above theoretical views.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474824000067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474824000067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创新绩效不足(创新绩效低于创新期望)是否以及何时会影响企业在探索性创新和开发性创新之间的权衡,这仍然是一个尚未探讨的重要问题。基于企业行为理论和代理理论的见解,我们提出,随着创新绩效不足的扩大,企业将把更多的资源用于探索性创新,而不是开发性创新。也就是说,创新绩效不足会积极影响企业对探索性创新的相对重视程度。此外,我们还提出,董事会监督能力和分析师覆盖率会增强创新绩效缺口对企业相对探索性创新重视程度的积极影响。利用 2008-2020 年中国上市公司的数据,我们获得了支持上述大部分理论观点的实证证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of innovation performance shortfall on firms’ trade-offs between exploratory and exploitative innovation: Do corporate governance factors matterʔ

Whether and when innovation performance shortfall (innovation performance below innovation aspiration) affects firms’ trade-offs between exploratory and exploitative innovation remains an important unexplored question. Based on insights from behavioral theory of the firm and agency theory, we propose that as the innovation performance shortfall widens, firms will devote more resources to exploratory innovation rather than to exploitative innovation. That is, innovation performance shortfall positively affects firms’ relative exploratory innovation emphasis. Furthermore, we propose that board monitoring capacity and analyst coverage enhance the positive effect of innovation performance shortfall on firms’ relative exploratory innovation emphasis. Using data on Chinese listed companies from 2008 to 2020, we obtain empirical evidence supporting most of the above theoretical views.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (JET-M) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology, innovation, and engineering management. The journal links engineering, science, and management disciplines. It addresses the issues involved in the planning, development, and implementation of technological capabilities to shape and accomplish the strategic and operational objectives of an organization. It covers not only R&D management, but also the entire spectrum of managerial concerns in technology-based organizations. This includes issues relating to new product development, human resource management, innovation process management, project management, technological fusion, marketing, technological forecasting and strategic planning. The journal provides an interface between technology and other corporate functions, such as R&D, marketing, manufacturing and administration. Its ultimate goal is to make a profound contribution to theory development, research and practice by serving as a leading forum for the publication of scholarly research on all aspects of technology, innovation, and engineering management.
期刊最新文献
How to design prototypes to prevent potential dominant logic conflict during the iterative learning process Patent pool and dominant design: An empirical study of patent pool from MPEG-LA Accelerating corporate innovation ecosystems: The exprivia business incubator case study Rethinking the trade-off relationship between innovation quantity and quality: the evidence from public energy R&D programs in South Korea Digital servitization strategies and business model innovation: The role of knowledge-intensive business services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1