关于狭小睡眠空间内二氧化碳浓度和空气分布年龄的实验研究

IF 6.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Building Simulation Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s12273-024-1101-1
Jingying Zhang, Yanyan Li, Haiguo Yin, Linfeng Liang, Songmei Zu, Le Gao, Ying Zhang, Angui Li
{"title":"关于狭小睡眠空间内二氧化碳浓度和空气分布年龄的实验研究","authors":"Jingying Zhang, Yanyan Li, Haiguo Yin, Linfeng Liang, Songmei Zu, Le Gao, Ying Zhang, Angui Li","doi":"10.1007/s12273-024-1101-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, rapid urban development has led to capsule hotels, sleep pods, and other tiny sleeping spaces that adapt to people’s fast-paced lives, achieving maximum functionality with a very small footprint. However, due to the small space, human metabolic pollutant (such as CO<sub>2</sub>) is more likely to accumulate, and the air is not easily circulated. In this paper, a full-size experimental platform is set up with three types of ventilation modes to explore the exclusion efficiency of metabolic pollutants and the overall distribution of age of air under these ventilation modes. The conclusions showed that the mean values of metabolic pollutant exclusion rates for the different ventilation modalities varied very little across the spatial dimensions of the confined space but varied considerably in the area around the head. The double-side attached ventilation method was the most effective in removing human metabolic pollutants, especially in the head region (CN ≥ 0.92), while the single-wall attached ventilation method had the best air exchange efficiency (<i>η</i> ≥ 0.85). This suggests an inconsistent distribution of CO<sub>2</sub> and age of air, which is contrary to general common sense. The conclusions of this paper can guide the design of ventilation for tiny sleeping spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":49226,"journal":{"name":"Building Simulation","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study on the CO2 concentration and age of air distribution inside tiny sleeping spaces\",\"authors\":\"Jingying Zhang, Yanyan Li, Haiguo Yin, Linfeng Liang, Songmei Zu, Le Gao, Ying Zhang, Angui Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12273-024-1101-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In recent years, rapid urban development has led to capsule hotels, sleep pods, and other tiny sleeping spaces that adapt to people’s fast-paced lives, achieving maximum functionality with a very small footprint. However, due to the small space, human metabolic pollutant (such as CO<sub>2</sub>) is more likely to accumulate, and the air is not easily circulated. In this paper, a full-size experimental platform is set up with three types of ventilation modes to explore the exclusion efficiency of metabolic pollutants and the overall distribution of age of air under these ventilation modes. The conclusions showed that the mean values of metabolic pollutant exclusion rates for the different ventilation modalities varied very little across the spatial dimensions of the confined space but varied considerably in the area around the head. The double-side attached ventilation method was the most effective in removing human metabolic pollutants, especially in the head region (CN ≥ 0.92), while the single-wall attached ventilation method had the best air exchange efficiency (<i>η</i> ≥ 0.85). This suggests an inconsistent distribution of CO<sub>2</sub> and age of air, which is contrary to general common sense. The conclusions of this paper can guide the design of ventilation for tiny sleeping spaces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building Simulation\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1101-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1101-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,城市的快速发展催生了胶囊旅馆、睡眠舱等适应人们快节奏生活的狭小睡眠空间,以极小的占地面积实现了最大的功能性。然而,由于空间狭小,人体代谢污染物(如二氧化碳)更容易积聚,空气也不容易流通。本文建立了一个全尺寸的实验平台,采用三种通风模式来探讨这些通风模式下代谢污染物的排除效率和空气年龄的总体分布。结论显示,不同通风方式的代谢污染物排除率平均值在密闭空间的空间维度上差异很小,但在头部周围区域差异很大。双面附着通风方式对人体代谢污染物的排除效果最好,尤其是在头部区域(CN ≥ 0.92),而单壁附着通风方式的空气交换效率最好(η ≥ 0.85)。这表明二氧化碳和空气年龄的分布不一致,这与一般常识相悖。本文的结论可以指导狭小睡眠空间的通风设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental study on the CO2 concentration and age of air distribution inside tiny sleeping spaces

In recent years, rapid urban development has led to capsule hotels, sleep pods, and other tiny sleeping spaces that adapt to people’s fast-paced lives, achieving maximum functionality with a very small footprint. However, due to the small space, human metabolic pollutant (such as CO2) is more likely to accumulate, and the air is not easily circulated. In this paper, a full-size experimental platform is set up with three types of ventilation modes to explore the exclusion efficiency of metabolic pollutants and the overall distribution of age of air under these ventilation modes. The conclusions showed that the mean values of metabolic pollutant exclusion rates for the different ventilation modalities varied very little across the spatial dimensions of the confined space but varied considerably in the area around the head. The double-side attached ventilation method was the most effective in removing human metabolic pollutants, especially in the head region (CN ≥ 0.92), while the single-wall attached ventilation method had the best air exchange efficiency (η ≥ 0.85). This suggests an inconsistent distribution of CO2 and age of air, which is contrary to general common sense. The conclusions of this paper can guide the design of ventilation for tiny sleeping spaces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Building Simulation
Building Simulation THERMODYNAMICS-CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
16.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Building Simulation: An International Journal publishes original, high quality, peer-reviewed research papers and review articles dealing with modeling and simulation of buildings including their systems. The goal is to promote the field of building science and technology to such a level that modeling will eventually be used in every aspect of building construction as a routine instead of an exception. Of particular interest are papers that reflect recent developments and applications of modeling tools and their impact on advances of building science and technology.
期刊最新文献
Evolving multi-objective optimization framework for early-stage building design: Improving energy efficiency, daylighting, view quality, and thermal comfort An integrated framework utilizing machine learning to accelerate the optimization of energy-efficient urban block forms Exploring the impact of evaluation methods on Global South building design—A case study in Brazil Mitigation of long-term heat extraction attenuation of U-type medium-deep borehole heat exchanger by climate change Developing an integrated prediction model for daylighting, thermal comfort, and energy consumption in residential buildings based on the stacking ensemble learning algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1