未加工、碾磨和切磨松木和杨木刨花的压力造粒:对压实过程和造粒强度的评估

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY European Journal of Wood and Wood Products Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1007/s00107-024-02046-6
Paweł Tryjarski, Aleksander Lisowski, Jakub Gawron
{"title":"未加工、碾磨和切磨松木和杨木刨花的压力造粒:对压实过程和造粒强度的评估","authors":"Paweł Tryjarski, Aleksander Lisowski, Jakub Gawron","doi":"10.1007/s00107-024-02046-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of the study was to investigate the densification characteristics of raw, milled, and cut-milled pine and poplar shavings and determine the strength parameters of pellets, pastilles, and granules. In producing agglomerates from hard pine shavings compared to plastic poplar shavings, 19% more specific compaction work was required with over 2-times more specific work to push the agglomerate out of the die opening. Pine agglomerates exhibited lower linear expansion than poplar agglomerates, achieving a higher single density. Due to the elevated content of thermoplastic lignin in the wood (30.7 and 18.4%, respectively), pine agglomerates demonstrated superior radial compression strength parameters, including specific deformation energy, maximum tensile stresses at which agglomerates cracked, and the highest modulus of elasticity. Agglomerates made of cut-milled shavings had the highest single density, but their tensile strength was significantly lower than that of agglomerates made from raw shavings. The susceptibility to densification of the shavings during sequentially repeated densification of small doses during pellet production was the highest, resulting in pellets characterised by the smallest linear and radial expansion, as well as the highest single density of 1081 kg·m<sup>–3</sup> and tensile strength among agglomerates. The smallest single density and strength were observed in granules produced with parameters recommended for particleboard production: a temperature of 170 °C and an agglomeration pressure of 12 MPa, compared to 93 °C and 70 MPa for pellets and pastilles, respectively. The higher temperature did not compensate for the much lower pressure. Shavings compaction parameters for granules are not recommended for particleboard production without a binder, typically urea–formaldehyde resin.</p>","PeriodicalId":550,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressure agglomeration of raw, milled and cut-milled pine and poplar shavings: assessment of the compaction process and agglomerate strength\",\"authors\":\"Paweł Tryjarski, Aleksander Lisowski, Jakub Gawron\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00107-024-02046-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of the study was to investigate the densification characteristics of raw, milled, and cut-milled pine and poplar shavings and determine the strength parameters of pellets, pastilles, and granules. In producing agglomerates from hard pine shavings compared to plastic poplar shavings, 19% more specific compaction work was required with over 2-times more specific work to push the agglomerate out of the die opening. Pine agglomerates exhibited lower linear expansion than poplar agglomerates, achieving a higher single density. Due to the elevated content of thermoplastic lignin in the wood (30.7 and 18.4%, respectively), pine agglomerates demonstrated superior radial compression strength parameters, including specific deformation energy, maximum tensile stresses at which agglomerates cracked, and the highest modulus of elasticity. Agglomerates made of cut-milled shavings had the highest single density, but their tensile strength was significantly lower than that of agglomerates made from raw shavings. The susceptibility to densification of the shavings during sequentially repeated densification of small doses during pellet production was the highest, resulting in pellets characterised by the smallest linear and radial expansion, as well as the highest single density of 1081 kg·m<sup>–3</sup> and tensile strength among agglomerates. The smallest single density and strength were observed in granules produced with parameters recommended for particleboard production: a temperature of 170 °C and an agglomeration pressure of 12 MPa, compared to 93 °C and 70 MPa for pellets and pastilles, respectively. The higher temperature did not compensate for the much lower pressure. Shavings compaction parameters for granules are not recommended for particleboard production without a binder, typically urea–formaldehyde resin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-024-02046-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-024-02046-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的目的是调查未加工、碾磨和切磨松木刨花和杨木刨花的致密化特性,并确定颗粒、糊状物和粒状物的强度参数。在用硬松木刨花生产团聚体时,与塑料杨木刨花相比,所需的具体压实工作量增加了 19%,将团聚体推出模口所需的具体工作量增加了 2 倍多。松木团聚体的线膨胀率低于杨木团聚体,从而获得了更高的单密度。由于木材中热塑性木质素含量较高(分别为 30.7% 和 18.4%),松木团聚体表现出更优越的径向压缩强度参数,包括比变形能、团聚体开裂时的最大拉伸应力和最高弹性模量。由切削刨花制成的团聚体具有最高的单密度,但其抗拉强度明显低于由原刨花制成的团聚体。在球团生产过程中,小剂量刨花在连续重复的致密化过程中的易致密化程度最高,由此产生的球团的线性膨胀率和径向膨胀率最小,单密度(1081 kg-m-3)和抗拉强度也是团粒中最高的。使用刨花板生产所推荐的参数:170 °C的温度和 12 兆帕的造粒压力,生产出的颗粒的单密度和强度最小,而颗粒和粉条的单密度和强度分别为 93 °C 和 70 兆帕。较高的温度无法弥补较低的压力。在不使用粘合剂(通常是脲醛树脂)的情况下,不建议使用颗粒的刨花压实参数来生产刨花板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pressure agglomeration of raw, milled and cut-milled pine and poplar shavings: assessment of the compaction process and agglomerate strength

The aim of the study was to investigate the densification characteristics of raw, milled, and cut-milled pine and poplar shavings and determine the strength parameters of pellets, pastilles, and granules. In producing agglomerates from hard pine shavings compared to plastic poplar shavings, 19% more specific compaction work was required with over 2-times more specific work to push the agglomerate out of the die opening. Pine agglomerates exhibited lower linear expansion than poplar agglomerates, achieving a higher single density. Due to the elevated content of thermoplastic lignin in the wood (30.7 and 18.4%, respectively), pine agglomerates demonstrated superior radial compression strength parameters, including specific deformation energy, maximum tensile stresses at which agglomerates cracked, and the highest modulus of elasticity. Agglomerates made of cut-milled shavings had the highest single density, but their tensile strength was significantly lower than that of agglomerates made from raw shavings. The susceptibility to densification of the shavings during sequentially repeated densification of small doses during pellet production was the highest, resulting in pellets characterised by the smallest linear and radial expansion, as well as the highest single density of 1081 kg·m–3 and tensile strength among agglomerates. The smallest single density and strength were observed in granules produced with parameters recommended for particleboard production: a temperature of 170 °C and an agglomeration pressure of 12 MPa, compared to 93 °C and 70 MPa for pellets and pastilles, respectively. The higher temperature did not compensate for the much lower pressure. Shavings compaction parameters for granules are not recommended for particleboard production without a binder, typically urea–formaldehyde resin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Wood and Wood Products reports on original research and new developments in the field of wood and wood products and their biological, chemical, physical as well as mechanical and technological properties, processes and uses. Subjects range from roundwood to wood based products, composite materials and structural applications, with related jointing techniques. Moreover, it deals with wood as a chemical raw material, source of energy as well as with inter-disciplinary aspects of environmental assessment and international markets. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products aims at promoting international scientific communication and transfer of new technologies from research into practice.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of slow pyrolysis liquid from sugarcane bagasse for wood protection and its leaching properties Bending performance of cross-laminated timber constructed from fibre-managed Eucalyptus nitens under short-term and long-term serviceability loads Bio-production of fire retardant and hydrophobic packaging paperboard with enhanced tensile strength through coating with modified cellulose nanofiber Damage identification and failure characterization of plywood based on AE-BP Model Fibre morphological characteristics, chemical composition and fuel properties of paulownia COTEVISA-2 wood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1