胎儿不是成人：对米勒堕胎问题的回应。

IF 3.3 2区哲学 Q1 ETHICS Journal of Medical Ethics Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1136/jme-2024-109854

Ben Saunders

{"title":"胎儿不是成人：对米勒堕胎问题的回应。","authors":"Ben Saunders","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-109854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Miller has recently argued that fetuses have the same inherent value as non-disabled adults. However, we do not need to postulate some property possessed equally by all humans, including fetuses, in order to explain the equality of non-disabled adults. It would suffice if there were some property possessed by all non-disabled adults, but not by fetuses.","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"768-769"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fetuses are not adult humans: a response to Miller on abortion.\",\"authors\":\"Ben Saunders\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jme-2024-109854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Miller has recently argued that fetuses have the same inherent value as non-disabled adults. However, we do not need to postulate some property possessed equally by all humans, including fetuses, in order to explain the equality of non-disabled adults. It would suffice if there were some property possessed by all non-disabled adults, but not by fetuses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"768-769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-109854\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-109854","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

米勒最近认为，胎儿与非残疾成年人具有相同的内在价值。然而，我们并不需要假设包括胎儿在内的所有人都平等地拥有某种属性，来解释非残疾成年人的平等性。如果所有非残疾成年人都拥有某种属性，而胎儿却没有，那就足够了。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Fetuses are not adult humans: a response to Miller on abortion.

Miller has recently argued that fetuses have the same inherent value as non-disabled adults. However, we do not need to postulate some property possessed equally by all humans, including fetuses, in order to explain the equality of non-disabled adults. It would suffice if there were some property possessed by all non-disabled adults, but not by fetuses.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Medical Ethics 医学-医学：伦理

CiteScore

7.80

自引率

9.80%

发文量

164

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Medical Ethics is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. The journal seeks to promote ethical reflection and conduct in scientific research and medical practice. It features articles on various ethical aspects of health care relevant to health care professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics professionals, researchers and bioscientists, policy makers and patients. Subscribers to the Journal of Medical Ethics also receive Medical Humanities journal at no extra cost. JME is the official journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics.

期刊最新文献

Advancing the scholarship of clinical ethics consultation. Autonomy versus exclusion in xenotransplantation trials. Distributive justice, best options and organ markets: a reply to Semrau. The ethics of synthetic DNA. Strengthening harm-theoretic pro-life views.