小脑缄默症儿童康复方法(REACH):一项国际跨学科调查研究。

IF 0.8 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/PRM-230006
Sharyl Samargia-Grivette, Helen Hartley, Karin Walsh, Jurgen Lemiere, Allison D Payne, Emma Litke, Ashley Knight
{"title":"小脑缄默症儿童康复方法(REACH):一项国际跨学科调查研究。","authors":"Sharyl Samargia-Grivette, Helen Hartley, Karin Walsh, Jurgen Lemiere, Allison D Payne, Emma Litke, Ashley Knight","doi":"10.3233/PRM-230006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pediatric cerebellar mutism syndrome (pCMS) can occur following resection of a posterior fossa tumor and, although some symptoms are transient, many result in long-lasting neurological deficits. A multi-disciplinary rehabilitation approach is often used in cases of pCMS; however, there have been no clinical trials to determine gold standards in rehabilitation practice in this population, which remains a research priority. The purpose of this study was to identify and compare intervention practices used in pCMS throughout the disciplines of occupational and physical therapy, speech-language pathology, and neuropsychology across geographic regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 55-question e-survey was created by an international multidisciplinary research group made up of members of the Posterior Fossa Society and sent to rehabilitation professionals in pediatric neuro-oncology centers in the US, Canada, and Europe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although some differences in the type of intervention used in pCMS were identified within each discipline, many of the targeted interventions including dose, frequency, and intensity were similar within disciplines across geographic regions. In addition, there were common themes identified across disciplines regarding challenges in the rehabilitation of this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results provide a foundation of current practices on which to build future intervention-based clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":16692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":"185-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11307050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REhabilitation Approaches in CHildren with cerebellar mutism syndrome (REACH): An international cross-disciplinary survey study.\",\"authors\":\"Sharyl Samargia-Grivette, Helen Hartley, Karin Walsh, Jurgen Lemiere, Allison D Payne, Emma Litke, Ashley Knight\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/PRM-230006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pediatric cerebellar mutism syndrome (pCMS) can occur following resection of a posterior fossa tumor and, although some symptoms are transient, many result in long-lasting neurological deficits. A multi-disciplinary rehabilitation approach is often used in cases of pCMS; however, there have been no clinical trials to determine gold standards in rehabilitation practice in this population, which remains a research priority. The purpose of this study was to identify and compare intervention practices used in pCMS throughout the disciplines of occupational and physical therapy, speech-language pathology, and neuropsychology across geographic regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 55-question e-survey was created by an international multidisciplinary research group made up of members of the Posterior Fossa Society and sent to rehabilitation professionals in pediatric neuro-oncology centers in the US, Canada, and Europe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although some differences in the type of intervention used in pCMS were identified within each discipline, many of the targeted interventions including dose, frequency, and intensity were similar within disciplines across geographic regions. In addition, there were common themes identified across disciplines regarding challenges in the rehabilitation of this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results provide a foundation of current practices on which to build future intervention-based clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"185-197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11307050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-230006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-230006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:小儿小脑缄默综合征(pCMS)可在后窝肿瘤切除术后发生,虽然有些症状是一过性的,但许多症状会导致长期的神经功能缺损。pCMS 病例通常采用多学科康复治疗方法;然而,目前还没有临床试验来确定该人群康复治疗的黄金标准,这仍是研究的重点。本研究旨在确定和比较不同地区的职业和物理治疗、言语病理学和神经心理学等学科对 pCMS 采用的干预方法:由后窝协会成员组成的国际多学科研究小组制作了一份包含 55 个问题的电子调查表,并发送给美国、加拿大和欧洲儿科神经肿瘤中心的康复专业人员:结果:虽然各学科在小儿脑血管病中使用的干预类型存在一些差异,但许多有针对性的干预措施(包括剂量、频率和强度)在不同学科、不同地区都是相似的。此外,各学科还就该人群康复过程中面临的挑战确定了共同的主题:这些结果为当前的实践提供了一个基础,未来可以在此基础上开展基于干预的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
REhabilitation Approaches in CHildren with cerebellar mutism syndrome (REACH): An international cross-disciplinary survey study.

Objective: Pediatric cerebellar mutism syndrome (pCMS) can occur following resection of a posterior fossa tumor and, although some symptoms are transient, many result in long-lasting neurological deficits. A multi-disciplinary rehabilitation approach is often used in cases of pCMS; however, there have been no clinical trials to determine gold standards in rehabilitation practice in this population, which remains a research priority. The purpose of this study was to identify and compare intervention practices used in pCMS throughout the disciplines of occupational and physical therapy, speech-language pathology, and neuropsychology across geographic regions.

Methods: A 55-question e-survey was created by an international multidisciplinary research group made up of members of the Posterior Fossa Society and sent to rehabilitation professionals in pediatric neuro-oncology centers in the US, Canada, and Europe.

Results: Although some differences in the type of intervention used in pCMS were identified within each discipline, many of the targeted interventions including dose, frequency, and intensity were similar within disciplines across geographic regions. In addition, there were common themes identified across disciplines regarding challenges in the rehabilitation of this population.

Conclusion: These results provide a foundation of current practices on which to build future intervention-based clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
139
期刊最新文献
A confounding pediatric spinal cord injury: Anterior, central, or both? Does diagnosis matter? Evaluating impact of pediatric chronic pain diagnosis on pain and function. New-onset hydrocephalus in an adult with cerebral palsy: A case report and review of the literature. Caregiver and student perspectives on school services for students with traumatic brain injury during the COVID-19 pandemic. Review of Appetite for Risk-What it is, Who has it and How I survived, by Robert R. Abbott.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1