三尖瓣分离技术对难以暴露的室间隔缺损闭合术的影响

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiac Surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-17 DOI:10.1155/2024/5280537
Shiho Yamazaki, Junichi Koizumi, Daiki Saito, Azuma Tabayashi, Takuya Goto, Norihiro Kondo, Akio Ikai, Hajime Kin
{"title":"三尖瓣分离技术对难以暴露的室间隔缺损闭合术的影响","authors":"Shiho Yamazaki,&nbsp;Junichi Koizumi,&nbsp;Daiki Saito,&nbsp;Azuma Tabayashi,&nbsp;Takuya Goto,&nbsp;Norihiro Kondo,&nbsp;Akio Ikai,&nbsp;Hajime Kin","doi":"10.1155/2024/5280537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure is a common procedure in congenital heart surgery. The exposure of VSDs can be challenging, especially in cases involving the tricuspid septal or anterior leaflets, chordae, or subvalvular apparatus. Although tricuspid valve detachment has been suggested to improve surgical visibility, its long-term effects remain unclear. Herein, we investigated the outcomes of VSD closure with or without tricuspid valve detachment and assessed the impact of this technique on postoperative tricuspid valve function and atrioventricular conduction. In total, 175 patients who underwent isolated VSD closure through the right atrium were retrospectively enrolled and divided into 2 groups: the tricuspid valve detachment group (<i>n</i> = 17, 9.7%) and the nontricuspid valve detachment group (<i>n</i> = 158, 90.3%). Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups, and medical records and echocardiography reports were reviewed for each patient. The primary outcomes were mortality and reoperation, whereas the secondary outcomes included residual VSD, tricuspid valve regurgitation, advanced atrioventricular block, and aortic valve regurgitation. Clinical variables were compared between the two groups. Overall, tricuspid valve detachment did not increase perioperative complications or affect long-term tricuspid valve function. There were no cases of mortality or reoperation in either group. Although the tricuspid valve detachment group had longer bypass and cross-clamp times, this did not significantly affect ventilation or intensive care unit stay duration. Follow-up echocardiography revealed no significant intergroup differences in tricuspid regurgitation, residual shunt, or aortic valve regurgitation. In conclusion, tricuspid valve detachment is a safe and reliable technique for the complete closure of hard-to-expose VSDs without compromising tricuspid valve function. Moreover, it does not increase the risk of adverse events, and its outcomes remain favorable during short- and long-term follow-ups.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5280537","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the Tricuspid Valve Detachment Technique on Hard-to-Expose Ventricular Septal Defect Closure\",\"authors\":\"Shiho Yamazaki,&nbsp;Junichi Koizumi,&nbsp;Daiki Saito,&nbsp;Azuma Tabayashi,&nbsp;Takuya Goto,&nbsp;Norihiro Kondo,&nbsp;Akio Ikai,&nbsp;Hajime Kin\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/5280537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure is a common procedure in congenital heart surgery. The exposure of VSDs can be challenging, especially in cases involving the tricuspid septal or anterior leaflets, chordae, or subvalvular apparatus. Although tricuspid valve detachment has been suggested to improve surgical visibility, its long-term effects remain unclear. Herein, we investigated the outcomes of VSD closure with or without tricuspid valve detachment and assessed the impact of this technique on postoperative tricuspid valve function and atrioventricular conduction. In total, 175 patients who underwent isolated VSD closure through the right atrium were retrospectively enrolled and divided into 2 groups: the tricuspid valve detachment group (<i>n</i> = 17, 9.7%) and the nontricuspid valve detachment group (<i>n</i> = 158, 90.3%). Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups, and medical records and echocardiography reports were reviewed for each patient. The primary outcomes were mortality and reoperation, whereas the secondary outcomes included residual VSD, tricuspid valve regurgitation, advanced atrioventricular block, and aortic valve regurgitation. Clinical variables were compared between the two groups. Overall, tricuspid valve detachment did not increase perioperative complications or affect long-term tricuspid valve function. There were no cases of mortality or reoperation in either group. Although the tricuspid valve detachment group had longer bypass and cross-clamp times, this did not significantly affect ventilation or intensive care unit stay duration. Follow-up echocardiography revealed no significant intergroup differences in tricuspid regurgitation, residual shunt, or aortic valve regurgitation. In conclusion, tricuspid valve detachment is a safe and reliable technique for the complete closure of hard-to-expose VSDs without compromising tricuspid valve function. Moreover, it does not increase the risk of adverse events, and its outcomes remain favorable during short- and long-term follow-ups.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5280537\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5280537\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5280537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

室间隔缺损(VSD)闭合术是先天性心脏病手术中的常见手术。暴露室间隔缺损具有挑战性,尤其是涉及三尖瓣室间隔或前叶、腱膜或瓣下器的病例。虽然有人认为三尖瓣剥离可以提高手术的可视性,但其长期效果仍不明确。在此,我们研究了采用或不采用三尖瓣分离术进行 VSD 关闭的结果,并评估了该技术对术后三尖瓣功能和房室传导的影响。回顾性研究共纳入了175例通过右心房进行孤立VSD闭合术的患者,并将其分为两组:三尖瓣分离组(n = 17,9.7%)和非三尖瓣分离组(n = 158,90.3%)。两组患者的特征具有可比性,并对每位患者的病历和超声心动图报告进行了审查。主要结果是死亡率和再次手术,次要结果包括残留 VSD、三尖瓣反流、晚期房室传导阻滞和主动脉瓣反流。对两组患者的临床变量进行了比较。总体而言,三尖瓣脱落不会增加围手术期并发症,也不会影响三尖瓣的长期功能。两组患者均无死亡或再次手术病例。虽然三尖瓣分离组的分流和交叉钳夹时间较长,但这对通气或重症监护室的住院时间没有明显影响。随访超声心动图显示,三尖瓣反流、残余分流或主动脉瓣反流在组间无明显差异。总之,三尖瓣分离术是一种安全可靠的技术,可在不影响三尖瓣功能的情况下完全关闭难以暴露的 VSD。此外,它不会增加不良事件发生的风险,而且在短期和长期随访中其结果仍然良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of the Tricuspid Valve Detachment Technique on Hard-to-Expose Ventricular Septal Defect Closure

Ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure is a common procedure in congenital heart surgery. The exposure of VSDs can be challenging, especially in cases involving the tricuspid septal or anterior leaflets, chordae, or subvalvular apparatus. Although tricuspid valve detachment has been suggested to improve surgical visibility, its long-term effects remain unclear. Herein, we investigated the outcomes of VSD closure with or without tricuspid valve detachment and assessed the impact of this technique on postoperative tricuspid valve function and atrioventricular conduction. In total, 175 patients who underwent isolated VSD closure through the right atrium were retrospectively enrolled and divided into 2 groups: the tricuspid valve detachment group (n = 17, 9.7%) and the nontricuspid valve detachment group (n = 158, 90.3%). Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups, and medical records and echocardiography reports were reviewed for each patient. The primary outcomes were mortality and reoperation, whereas the secondary outcomes included residual VSD, tricuspid valve regurgitation, advanced atrioventricular block, and aortic valve regurgitation. Clinical variables were compared between the two groups. Overall, tricuspid valve detachment did not increase perioperative complications or affect long-term tricuspid valve function. There were no cases of mortality or reoperation in either group. Although the tricuspid valve detachment group had longer bypass and cross-clamp times, this did not significantly affect ventilation or intensive care unit stay duration. Follow-up echocardiography revealed no significant intergroup differences in tricuspid regurgitation, residual shunt, or aortic valve regurgitation. In conclusion, tricuspid valve detachment is a safe and reliable technique for the complete closure of hard-to-expose VSDs without compromising tricuspid valve function. Moreover, it does not increase the risk of adverse events, and its outcomes remain favorable during short- and long-term follow-ups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
976
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Surgery (JCS) is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to contemporary surgical treatment of cardiac disease. Renown for its detailed "how to" methods, JCS''s well-illustrated, concise technical articles, critical reviews and commentaries are highly valued by dedicated readers worldwide. With Editor-in-Chief Harold Lazar, MD and an internationally prominent editorial board, JCS continues its 20-year history as an important professional resource. Editorial coverage includes biologic support, mechanical cardiac assist and/or replacement and surgical techniques, and features current material on topics such as OPCAB surgery, stented and stentless valves, endovascular stent placement, atrial fibrillation, transplantation, percutaneous valve repair/replacement, left ventricular restoration surgery, immunobiology, and bridges to transplant and recovery. In addition, special sections (Images in Cardiac Surgery, Cardiac Regeneration) and historical reviews stimulate reader interest. The journal also routinely publishes proceedings of important international symposia in a timely manner.
期刊最新文献
Single-Center Success of Concomitant Cryothermal Cox-Maze IV Procedure Interrupted Aortic Arch: Assessment of Morphology and Associated Cardiovascular Anomalies on Computed Tomography Angiography Implementation of Robotic Coronary Surgery after Established Mitral Robotic Program Impact of Donor Coronary Artery Disease on Recipient Outcomes in Heart Transplantation Short- and Midterm Outcomes of Off- and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass in Patients with a Mean Age of 65 or More: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1