加强肺癌护理中的多学科团队流程:自我评估工具包和最佳做法

Poka Cui, Peter Blanshard, María Teresa Campos-Partera, A. Moucquot, S. H. R. Naqvi, D. Dellamonica, Heather Moses
{"title":"加强肺癌护理中的多学科团队流程:自我评估工具包和最佳做法","authors":"Poka Cui, Peter Blanshard, María Teresa Campos-Partera, A. Moucquot, S. H. R. Naqvi, D. Dellamonica, Heather Moses","doi":"10.25270/jcp.2024.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) play a pivotal role in the comprehen­sive management of cancer. MDT meetings (MDTMs) bring together specialized experts across the entire patient care spectrum, convening regularly to discuss patient cases, select optimal diagnostic strategies, and determine the most ap­propriate treatment modalities. By fostering cross-disciplinary interaction, MDTs aim to enhance patient outcomes and elevate the collective proficiency within a health care institution, promoting knowledge dissemination and ensuring health care practitioners remain abreast of the latest clinical insights. This study’s methods comprised an extensive review of existing literature coupled with in­terviews involving lung cancer MDTs from 24 medical centers across Europe and Canada. The research focused on elucidating dynamics and variations observed among lung cancer MDTs, outlining an optimal MDT process, identifying varianc­es in the study sample, and introducing a comprehensive self-assessment tool­kit for continuous evaluation and improvement. The report discusses how these results should be used to self-optimize hospital MDTs, promote standardization, and encourage increased cross-hospital best practices sharing. With this, MDTs will be better positioned to deliver on the key goal of improved patient outcomes while promoting equality of access to health care.","PeriodicalId":507805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathways","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Multidisciplinary Team Processes in Lung Cancer Care: A Self-Assessment Toolkit and Best Practices\",\"authors\":\"Poka Cui, Peter Blanshard, María Teresa Campos-Partera, A. Moucquot, S. H. R. Naqvi, D. Dellamonica, Heather Moses\",\"doi\":\"10.25270/jcp.2024.01.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) play a pivotal role in the comprehen­sive management of cancer. MDT meetings (MDTMs) bring together specialized experts across the entire patient care spectrum, convening regularly to discuss patient cases, select optimal diagnostic strategies, and determine the most ap­propriate treatment modalities. By fostering cross-disciplinary interaction, MDTs aim to enhance patient outcomes and elevate the collective proficiency within a health care institution, promoting knowledge dissemination and ensuring health care practitioners remain abreast of the latest clinical insights. This study’s methods comprised an extensive review of existing literature coupled with in­terviews involving lung cancer MDTs from 24 medical centers across Europe and Canada. The research focused on elucidating dynamics and variations observed among lung cancer MDTs, outlining an optimal MDT process, identifying varianc­es in the study sample, and introducing a comprehensive self-assessment tool­kit for continuous evaluation and improvement. The report discusses how these results should be used to self-optimize hospital MDTs, promote standardization, and encourage increased cross-hospital best practices sharing. With this, MDTs will be better positioned to deliver on the key goal of improved patient outcomes while promoting equality of access to health care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pathways\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pathways\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2024.01.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2024.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多学科团队(MDT)在癌症的综合治疗中发挥着举足轻重的作用。多学科团队会议(MDTMs)汇集了整个患者护理领域的专业专家,定期召开会议讨论患者病例、选择最佳诊断策略并确定最合适的治疗方式。通过促进跨学科互动,多学科会诊旨在提高患者的治疗效果,提升医疗机构的集体能力,促进知识传播,确保医疗从业人员掌握最新的临床见解。本研究的方法包括广泛查阅现有文献,以及对欧洲和加拿大 24 家医疗中心的肺癌 MDT 进行访谈。研究重点在于阐明肺癌 MDT 的动态变化,勾勒出最佳 MDT 流程,确定研究样本中的差异,并为持续评估和改进引入一套全面的自我评估工具包。报告讨论了应如何利用这些结果对医院 MDT 进行自我优化,促进标准化,并鼓励加强跨医院的最佳实践分享。这样,MDT 就能更好地实现改善患者治疗效果的关键目标,同时促进医疗服务的平等性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing Multidisciplinary Team Processes in Lung Cancer Care: A Self-Assessment Toolkit and Best Practices
Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) play a pivotal role in the comprehen­sive management of cancer. MDT meetings (MDTMs) bring together specialized experts across the entire patient care spectrum, convening regularly to discuss patient cases, select optimal diagnostic strategies, and determine the most ap­propriate treatment modalities. By fostering cross-disciplinary interaction, MDTs aim to enhance patient outcomes and elevate the collective proficiency within a health care institution, promoting knowledge dissemination and ensuring health care practitioners remain abreast of the latest clinical insights. This study’s methods comprised an extensive review of existing literature coupled with in­terviews involving lung cancer MDTs from 24 medical centers across Europe and Canada. The research focused on elucidating dynamics and variations observed among lung cancer MDTs, outlining an optimal MDT process, identifying varianc­es in the study sample, and introducing a comprehensive self-assessment tool­kit for continuous evaluation and improvement. The report discusses how these results should be used to self-optimize hospital MDTs, promote standardization, and encourage increased cross-hospital best practices sharing. With this, MDTs will be better positioned to deliver on the key goal of improved patient outcomes while promoting equality of access to health care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PSA Outcomes and Clinical Surveillance Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With a Next-Generation Androgen Receptor Inhibitor in Urology Practices With or Without In-Office Dispensing Shifting the Paradigm: The Impact of AI at the Point of Care in Cancer Treatment Bringing Value to Health Care Comprehensive Genomic Testing: Tissue Stewardship and Best Practices Patient-Reported Outcomes in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Design, Implementation, and Pilot Results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1