利用三维立体摄影测量法对单侧或双侧唇腭裂患者进行面部分析。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI:10.1177/10556656241234603
Vanessa Ota Nogueira, Maria Carolina Neves, Karin Neppelenbroek, Thaís Marchini Oliveira, Chiarella Sforza, Simone Soares
{"title":"利用三维立体摄影测量法对单侧或双侧唇腭裂患者进行面部分析。","authors":"Vanessa Ota Nogueira, Maria Carolina Neves, Karin Neppelenbroek, Thaís Marchini Oliveira, Chiarella Sforza, Simone Soares","doi":"10.1177/10556656241234603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the quantitative values of linear and angular facial anthropometrics in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and compare them with those of patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) using three-dimensional (3D) facial imaging.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, observational, and cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies/USP (HRAC/USP).</p><p><strong>Patients/ participants: </strong>In total, 61 non-syndromic patients with CLP who underwent multidisciplinary treatment and rehabilitated with a prosthesis were enrolled and divided into those with UCLP (G1; n = 31) and those with BCLP (G2; n = 30).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Facial images were captured using a 3D camera after landmarks were marked on each patient's face. The software evaluated linear and angular parameters. Statistical tests were applied. Significance was determined as <i>P </i>< 0.05.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>Overall, 22 linear and 13 angular measurements were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nasal length (<i>P </i>= 0.08), middle third of the face (<i>P </i>= 0.06), base nose width (<i>P </i>< 0.001), nasal root width (<i>P </i>< 0.001), nasal tip angle (<i>P </i>= 0.018), philtrum width (<i>P </i>< 0.001), lower face width (<i>P </i>= 0.039) and midfacial depth (<i>P </i>= 0.040) were significantly higher in G2; the upper cutaneous lip height was significantly higher in G1. Sexual dimorphism was observed except for linear measurements (linear distance between the labiale superius and labiale inferius landmarks, nasal root width, and upper cutaneous lip length) and angular measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>G2 had a greater length and width of nose and nasal root, nasal tip angle, philtrum width, and lower face width, midfacial depth, and midface third than G1. These findings also revealed the presence of sexual dimorphism.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facial Analysis of Patients with Unilateral or Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using 3D Stereophotogrammetry.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Ota Nogueira, Maria Carolina Neves, Karin Neppelenbroek, Thaís Marchini Oliveira, Chiarella Sforza, Simone Soares\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241234603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the quantitative values of linear and angular facial anthropometrics in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and compare them with those of patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) using three-dimensional (3D) facial imaging.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, observational, and cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies/USP (HRAC/USP).</p><p><strong>Patients/ participants: </strong>In total, 61 non-syndromic patients with CLP who underwent multidisciplinary treatment and rehabilitated with a prosthesis were enrolled and divided into those with UCLP (G1; n = 31) and those with BCLP (G2; n = 30).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Facial images were captured using a 3D camera after landmarks were marked on each patient's face. The software evaluated linear and angular parameters. Statistical tests were applied. Significance was determined as <i>P </i>< 0.05.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>Overall, 22 linear and 13 angular measurements were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nasal length (<i>P </i>= 0.08), middle third of the face (<i>P </i>= 0.06), base nose width (<i>P </i>< 0.001), nasal root width (<i>P </i>< 0.001), nasal tip angle (<i>P </i>= 0.018), philtrum width (<i>P </i>< 0.001), lower face width (<i>P </i>= 0.039) and midfacial depth (<i>P </i>= 0.040) were significantly higher in G2; the upper cutaneous lip height was significantly higher in G1. Sexual dimorphism was observed except for linear measurements (linear distance between the labiale superius and labiale inferius landmarks, nasal root width, and upper cutaneous lip length) and angular measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>G2 had a greater length and width of nose and nasal root, nasal tip angle, philtrum width, and lower face width, midfacial depth, and midface third than G1. These findings also revealed the presence of sexual dimorphism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241234603\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241234603","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的利用三维面部成像技术,评估单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者面部线性和角度人体测量的定量值,并与双侧唇腭裂(BCLP)患者进行比较:设计:回顾性、观察性和横断面研究:颅面畸形康复医院(HRAC/USP):共纳入61名接受多学科治疗并使用假肢进行康复的非综合征CLP患者,分为UCLP患者(G1;n = 31)和BCLP患者(G2;n = 30):在每位患者的面部标记地标后,使用 3D 相机采集面部图像。软件评估了线性和角度参数。应用统计检验。主要结果测量值以 P 表示显著性:共评估了 22 个线性参数和 13 个角度参数:结果:G2 的鼻长(P = 0.08)、面中部三分之一(P = 0.06)、鼻翼基底宽度(P P = 0.018)、咽鼓管宽度(P P = 0.039)和面中部深度(P = 0.040)显著高于 G2;G1 的上唇高度显著高于 G1。除了线性测量(唇上缘和唇下缘地标间的线性距离、鼻根宽度和上唇长度)和角度测量外,均观察到性别双态性:结论:与 G1 相比,G2 的鼻子和鼻根长度和宽度、鼻尖角度、咽鼓管宽度以及脸部下部宽度、脸部中部深度和脸部中部三分之一更大。这些结果还显示了性别二态性的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facial Analysis of Patients with Unilateral or Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using 3D Stereophotogrammetry.

Objectives: To evaluate the quantitative values of linear and angular facial anthropometrics in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and compare them with those of patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) using three-dimensional (3D) facial imaging.

Design: Retrospective, observational, and cross-sectional study.

Setting: Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies/USP (HRAC/USP).

Patients/ participants: In total, 61 non-syndromic patients with CLP who underwent multidisciplinary treatment and rehabilitated with a prosthesis were enrolled and divided into those with UCLP (G1; n = 31) and those with BCLP (G2; n = 30).

Intervention: Facial images were captured using a 3D camera after landmarks were marked on each patient's face. The software evaluated linear and angular parameters. Statistical tests were applied. Significance was determined as P < 0.05.

Main outcome measurements: Overall, 22 linear and 13 angular measurements were evaluated.

Results: The nasal length (P = 0.08), middle third of the face (P = 0.06), base nose width (P < 0.001), nasal root width (P < 0.001), nasal tip angle (P = 0.018), philtrum width (P < 0.001), lower face width (P = 0.039) and midfacial depth (P = 0.040) were significantly higher in G2; the upper cutaneous lip height was significantly higher in G1. Sexual dimorphism was observed except for linear measurements (linear distance between the labiale superius and labiale inferius landmarks, nasal root width, and upper cutaneous lip length) and angular measurements.

Conclusions: G2 had a greater length and width of nose and nasal root, nasal tip angle, philtrum width, and lower face width, midfacial depth, and midface third than G1. These findings also revealed the presence of sexual dimorphism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
期刊最新文献
Caring for a Child with a Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Narrative Review. Effect of Age and Gender on Nasalance Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review. Expanding Accessibility in Cleft Care: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Literacy of Alveolar Bone Grafting Information. Postoperative Feeding in Cleft Surgery: A Systematic Review. Reduction Cranioplasty in Cases of Hydrocephalic Macrocephaly: Pearls and Pitfalls of Computer-Assisted Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1