对唇腭裂患者使用骨替代物进行牙槽骨移植的荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Tzu Chi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_125_23
Indri Lakhsmi Putri, Pascalis Fabian, Citrawati Dyah Kencono Wungu
{"title":"对唇腭裂患者使用骨替代物进行牙槽骨移植的荟萃分析。","authors":"Indri Lakhsmi Putri, Pascalis Fabian, Citrawati Dyah Kencono Wungu","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_125_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP), an alveolar bone graft (ABG) is carried out for alveolar cleft closure. Several sources for ABG include autologous bone, xenologous bone, and alloplastic substitutes. Autologous bone has been the preferred source for ABG. Alloplastic substitutes might serve as an alternative. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between autologous and alloplastic as sources for ABG. This study made use of eight web databases. Randomized control trial<i>s</i> (RCTs) and non-RCTs were included. CLP patients with alveolar cleft with imaging studies, computed tomography (CT scan) and/or cone beam CT scan, and bone graft volume within 6-12 months postintervention were selected. Bone graft volume within 6-12 months postintervention was assessed. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. After 6-12 months of follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in bone graft volume between autologous and alloplastic bone grafts (fixed-effect model estimate value = 0.21; confidence interval - 0.301-0.730; <i>P</i> = 0.414). The limitations include small research sample sizes, a high likelihood of bias among included studies, and different alloplastic materials from each included study. Autologous and alloplastic bone grafts showed similar effectiveness in alveolar bone grafting. Further clinical trial studies with bigger sample sizes and similar interventions are needed as evidence for future reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"53-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10887340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients.\",\"authors\":\"Indri Lakhsmi Putri, Pascalis Fabian, Citrawati Dyah Kencono Wungu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_125_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP), an alveolar bone graft (ABG) is carried out for alveolar cleft closure. Several sources for ABG include autologous bone, xenologous bone, and alloplastic substitutes. Autologous bone has been the preferred source for ABG. Alloplastic substitutes might serve as an alternative. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between autologous and alloplastic as sources for ABG. This study made use of eight web databases. Randomized control trial<i>s</i> (RCTs) and non-RCTs were included. CLP patients with alveolar cleft with imaging studies, computed tomography (CT scan) and/or cone beam CT scan, and bone graft volume within 6-12 months postintervention were selected. Bone graft volume within 6-12 months postintervention was assessed. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. After 6-12 months of follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in bone graft volume between autologous and alloplastic bone grafts (fixed-effect model estimate value = 0.21; confidence interval - 0.301-0.730; <i>P</i> = 0.414). The limitations include small research sample sizes, a high likelihood of bias among included studies, and different alloplastic materials from each included study. Autologous and alloplastic bone grafts showed similar effectiveness in alveolar bone grafting. Further clinical trial studies with bigger sample sizes and similar interventions are needed as evidence for future reviews.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tzu Chi Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"53-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10887340/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tzu Chi Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_125_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_125_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于唇腭裂患者来说,牙槽骨移植(ABG)可用于牙槽裂的闭合。牙槽骨移植的几种来源包括自体骨、异种骨和异体替代物。自体骨一直是 ABG 的首选来源。异体替代物可作为一种替代方法。本研究旨在比较自体骨和异体骨作为 ABG 来源的结果。本研究使用了八个网络数据库。研究纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)和非RCT试验。研究选取了具有影像学检查、计算机断层扫描(CT 扫描)和/或锥形束 CT 扫描以及干预后 6-12 个月内的植骨量的牙槽骨裂的 CLP 患者。评估干预后 6-12 个月内的植骨量。三项研究符合纳入标准。随访 6-12 个月后,自体骨移植和异体骨移植的骨量差异无统计学意义(固定效应模型估计值 = 0.21;置信区间 - 0.301-0.730;P = 0.414)。研究的局限性包括研究样本量较小、纳入的研究之间很可能存在偏差,以及每项纳入研究的异体材料不同。自体骨移植和异体骨移植在牙槽骨移植中显示出相似的效果。今后的综述需要更多样本量更大、干预措施类似的临床试验研究作为证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients.

In individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP), an alveolar bone graft (ABG) is carried out for alveolar cleft closure. Several sources for ABG include autologous bone, xenologous bone, and alloplastic substitutes. Autologous bone has been the preferred source for ABG. Alloplastic substitutes might serve as an alternative. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between autologous and alloplastic as sources for ABG. This study made use of eight web databases. Randomized control trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs were included. CLP patients with alveolar cleft with imaging studies, computed tomography (CT scan) and/or cone beam CT scan, and bone graft volume within 6-12 months postintervention were selected. Bone graft volume within 6-12 months postintervention was assessed. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. After 6-12 months of follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in bone graft volume between autologous and alloplastic bone grafts (fixed-effect model estimate value = 0.21; confidence interval - 0.301-0.730; P = 0.414). The limitations include small research sample sizes, a high likelihood of bias among included studies, and different alloplastic materials from each included study. Autologous and alloplastic bone grafts showed similar effectiveness in alveolar bone grafting. Further clinical trial studies with bigger sample sizes and similar interventions are needed as evidence for future reviews.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Epigenetic modification in radiotherapy and immunotherapy for cancers. Natural phytochemicals as small-molecule proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. The obesity paradox exists in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of body mass index effects on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in Asia. Unraveling the interplay between inflammation and stem cell mobilization or homing: Implications for tissue repair and therapeutics. C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12-C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 signaling axis in cancer and the development of chemotherapeutic molecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1