家庭筛查和健康信息的提供能否改善高血压的诊断、治疗和控制?印度城市的回归不连续分析

Michaela Theilmann, Sneha Sarah Mani, Pascal Geldsetzer, Shivani A. Patel, Mohammed K. Ali, Harsha Thirumurthy, KM Venkat Narayan, Viswanathan Mohan, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Nikhil Tandon, Nikkil Sudharsanan
{"title":"家庭筛查和健康信息的提供能否改善高血压的诊断、治疗和控制?印度城市的回归不连续分析","authors":"Michaela Theilmann, Sneha Sarah Mani, Pascal Geldsetzer, Shivani A. Patel, Mohammed K. Ali, Harsha Thirumurthy, KM Venkat Narayan, Viswanathan Mohan, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Nikhil Tandon, Nikkil Sudharsanan","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.26.24303288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:\nIn India, several state governments are implementing or considering home-based hypertension screening programs to improve population-wide diagnosis and blood pressure (BP) control rates. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of home-based screening programs in India.\nMethods: Using six waves of population-representative cohort data (N = 15,573), we estimate the causal effect of a home-based hypertension screening intervention on diagnosis, treatment, and BP using a novel application of the Regression Discontinuity Design. Findings:\nWe find that screening individuals' BP in their homes and providing health information and a referral to those with elevated BP did not meaningfully improve hypertension diagnosis (0.1, p-value: 0.82), treatment (-0.2, p-value: 0.49), or BP levels (systolic: -1.8, p-value: 0.03; diastolic: 0.5, p-value: 0.39). This null effect is robust across subpopulations and alternative specifications. Interpretation:\nOur findings suggest that a lack of knowledge of one's hypertension status might not be the primary reason for low diagnosis and treatment rates in India, where other structural and behavioral barriers may be more relevant. Adapting screening efforts to address these additional barriers will be essential for translating India's screening efforts into improved population health.","PeriodicalId":501072,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Economics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does home-based screening and health information provision improve hypertension diagnosis, treatment, and control? A regression discontinuity analysis in urban India\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Theilmann, Sneha Sarah Mani, Pascal Geldsetzer, Shivani A. Patel, Mohammed K. Ali, Harsha Thirumurthy, KM Venkat Narayan, Viswanathan Mohan, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Nikhil Tandon, Nikkil Sudharsanan\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.02.26.24303288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:\\nIn India, several state governments are implementing or considering home-based hypertension screening programs to improve population-wide diagnosis and blood pressure (BP) control rates. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of home-based screening programs in India.\\nMethods: Using six waves of population-representative cohort data (N = 15,573), we estimate the causal effect of a home-based hypertension screening intervention on diagnosis, treatment, and BP using a novel application of the Regression Discontinuity Design. Findings:\\nWe find that screening individuals' BP in their homes and providing health information and a referral to those with elevated BP did not meaningfully improve hypertension diagnosis (0.1, p-value: 0.82), treatment (-0.2, p-value: 0.49), or BP levels (systolic: -1.8, p-value: 0.03; diastolic: 0.5, p-value: 0.39). This null effect is robust across subpopulations and alternative specifications. Interpretation:\\nOur findings suggest that a lack of knowledge of one's hypertension status might not be the primary reason for low diagnosis and treatment rates in India, where other structural and behavioral barriers may be more relevant. Adapting screening efforts to address these additional barriers will be essential for translating India's screening efforts into improved population health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Economics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.26.24303288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.26.24303288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在印度,一些邦政府正在实施或考虑实施家庭高血压筛查计划,以提高全民诊断率和血压(BP)控制率。然而,有关印度家庭高血压筛查项目有效性的证据有限:方法:我们利用六波具有人口代表性的队列数据(N = 15,573),采用回归不连续设计的新方法,估算了家庭高血压筛查干预对诊断、治疗和血压的因果效应。研究结果:我们发现,在家中筛查个人血压并为血压升高者提供健康信息和转介服务并不能有效改善高血压诊断(0.1,P 值:0.82)、治疗(-0.2,P 值:0.49)或血压水平(收缩压:-1.8,P 值:0.03;舒张压:0.5,P 值:0.39)。这种无效效应在不同的亚人群和替代规格中都是稳健的。解释:我们的研究结果表明,不了解自己的高血压状况可能不是印度诊断率和治疗率低的主要原因,其他结构性和行为性障碍可能与此相关。要将印度的筛查工作转化为改善人口健康的成果,就必须调整筛查工作以解决这些额外的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does home-based screening and health information provision improve hypertension diagnosis, treatment, and control? A regression discontinuity analysis in urban India
Background: In India, several state governments are implementing or considering home-based hypertension screening programs to improve population-wide diagnosis and blood pressure (BP) control rates. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of home-based screening programs in India. Methods: Using six waves of population-representative cohort data (N = 15,573), we estimate the causal effect of a home-based hypertension screening intervention on diagnosis, treatment, and BP using a novel application of the Regression Discontinuity Design. Findings: We find that screening individuals' BP in their homes and providing health information and a referral to those with elevated BP did not meaningfully improve hypertension diagnosis (0.1, p-value: 0.82), treatment (-0.2, p-value: 0.49), or BP levels (systolic: -1.8, p-value: 0.03; diastolic: 0.5, p-value: 0.39). This null effect is robust across subpopulations and alternative specifications. Interpretation: Our findings suggest that a lack of knowledge of one's hypertension status might not be the primary reason for low diagnosis and treatment rates in India, where other structural and behavioral barriers may be more relevant. Adapting screening efforts to address these additional barriers will be essential for translating India's screening efforts into improved population health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Co-developing a comprehensive disease policy model with stakeholders: the case of malaria during pregnancy How does participation in coal-to-gas policy and availability of natural gas pipelines affect residents' well-being? Causally-informative analyses of the effect of job displacement on all-cause and specific-cause mortality from the 1990s Finnish recession until 2020: A population registry study Privacy Protection of Sexually Transmitted Infections Information from Chinese Electronic Medical Records Quantifying the health impact of crop breeding: Revisiting the Disability-Adjusted Life Years Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1