解释跨文化能力各组成部分之间的关系:结构方程模型法

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL International Journal of Intercultural Relations Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101953
Qing Wang , Timothy Teo
{"title":"解释跨文化能力各组成部分之间的关系:结构方程模型法","authors":"Qing Wang ,&nbsp;Timothy Teo","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This large-scale study aims to test Byram’s model of intercultural competence (IC) (1997) and examine the relationships among the five IC components – attitudes, knowledge, skills of interpreting and relating, skills of discovery and interaction, and critical cultural awareness. Although different IC models have been put forward each year, little empirical effort has been made to validate the theoretic IC models. The current study thus intends to fill the gap in the literature by testing Byram’s model and examining the relationships among the model’s components. Data were collected from 2599 students enrolled in 11 Chinese universities and colleges. Structural equation modelling was employed, and the reliability and validity of the research model were tested. The results indicated that 53% of the variance in critical cultural awareness was explained by attitudes and skills. Individuals’ attitudes significantly influenced their skills of discovery and interaction, while knowledge significantly influenced their skills of interpreting and relating. In addition, an individual’s cultural knowledge is not directly associated with their critical cultural awareness. This study provides implications for IC cultivation in foreign language teaching in the Chinese higher education context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining the relationships among components of intercultural competence: A structural equation modelling approach\",\"authors\":\"Qing Wang ,&nbsp;Timothy Teo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This large-scale study aims to test Byram’s model of intercultural competence (IC) (1997) and examine the relationships among the five IC components – attitudes, knowledge, skills of interpreting and relating, skills of discovery and interaction, and critical cultural awareness. Although different IC models have been put forward each year, little empirical effort has been made to validate the theoretic IC models. The current study thus intends to fill the gap in the literature by testing Byram’s model and examining the relationships among the model’s components. Data were collected from 2599 students enrolled in 11 Chinese universities and colleges. Structural equation modelling was employed, and the reliability and validity of the research model were tested. The results indicated that 53% of the variance in critical cultural awareness was explained by attitudes and skills. Individuals’ attitudes significantly influenced their skills of discovery and interaction, while knowledge significantly influenced their skills of interpreting and relating. In addition, an individual’s cultural knowledge is not directly associated with their critical cultural awareness. This study provides implications for IC cultivation in foreign language teaching in the Chinese higher education context.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000221\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项大规模研究的目的是检验 Byram 的跨文化能力(IC)模型(1997 年),并研究 IC 五个组成部分--态度、知识、解释和联系技能、发现和互动技能以及批判性文化意识--之间的关系。尽管每年都有不同的 IC 模型被提出,但很少有实证研究来验证理论上的 IC 模型。因此,本研究旨在通过检验 Byram 的模型和研究该模型各组成部分之间的关系来填补文献空白。研究收集了中国 11 所大专院校 2599 名学生的数据。研究采用了结构方程模型,并检验了研究模型的信度和效度。结果表明,态度和技能解释了批判性文化意识变异的 53%。个人的态度极大地影响了他们的发现和互动技能,而知识则极大地影响了他们的解释和联系技能。此外,个人的文化知识与其批判性文化意识并无直接联系。本研究为中国高等教育外语教学中的IC培养提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explaining the relationships among components of intercultural competence: A structural equation modelling approach

This large-scale study aims to test Byram’s model of intercultural competence (IC) (1997) and examine the relationships among the five IC components – attitudes, knowledge, skills of interpreting and relating, skills of discovery and interaction, and critical cultural awareness. Although different IC models have been put forward each year, little empirical effort has been made to validate the theoretic IC models. The current study thus intends to fill the gap in the literature by testing Byram’s model and examining the relationships among the model’s components. Data were collected from 2599 students enrolled in 11 Chinese universities and colleges. Structural equation modelling was employed, and the reliability and validity of the research model were tested. The results indicated that 53% of the variance in critical cultural awareness was explained by attitudes and skills. Individuals’ attitudes significantly influenced their skills of discovery and interaction, while knowledge significantly influenced their skills of interpreting and relating. In addition, an individual’s cultural knowledge is not directly associated with their critical cultural awareness. This study provides implications for IC cultivation in foreign language teaching in the Chinese higher education context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
期刊最新文献
Academic adaptation of international students in the chinese higher education environment: A case study with mixed methods Bright and dark sides: Does collective behavior past participation experience affect participation willingness? Sense of belongingness, discrimination, and mental health: Associations and buffering effects of sense of belonging on mental health among Finnish native and immigrant-origin youth Sea turtles stranded ashore: Sociocultural dissonance and identity conflicts in migration intentions of Chinese international student returnees 50+ years of psychological acculturation research: Progress and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1