间谍活动、伦理与法律：从哲学到实践

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW Criminal Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI:10.1007/s11572-024-09719-6

Cécile Fabre

{"title":"间谍活动、伦理与法律：从哲学到实践","authors":"Cécile Fabre","doi":"10.1007/s11572-024-09719-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I respond to Lars Christie, David Omand and Stephen Ratner for their thoughtful comments on my book Spying through a Glass Darkly. In that book, I provide a philosophical defence of espionage and counter-intelligence activities. I have little to say about how best to implement the moral norms I defend so that they can help guide intelligence officers’ actions, in the world as we know it here and now. Relatedly, I have little if anything to say about whether domestic and international law should reflect and entrench those norms. These are the gaps which David Omand’s and Stephen Ratner’s contributions seek to fill. First, though, I consider Lars Christie’s probing objections to my views on the ethics of deception.","PeriodicalId":45447,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Espionage, Ethics, and Law: From Philosophy to Practice\",\"authors\":\"Cécile Fabre\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11572-024-09719-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I respond to Lars Christie, David Omand and Stephen Ratner for their thoughtful comments on my book Spying through a Glass Darkly. In that book, I provide a philosophical defence of espionage and counter-intelligence activities. I have little to say about how best to implement the moral norms I defend so that they can help guide intelligence officers’ actions, in the world as we know it here and now. Relatedly, I have little if anything to say about whether domestic and international law should reflect and entrench those norms. These are the gaps which David Omand’s and Stephen Ratner’s contributions seek to fill. First, though, I consider Lars Christie’s probing objections to my views on the ethics of deception.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Law and Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Law and Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-024-09719-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-024-09719-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

拉尔斯-克里斯蒂（Lars Christie）、戴维-奥曼德（David Omand）和斯蒂芬-拉特纳（Stephen Ratner）对我的著作《暗中窥探》（Spying through a Glass Darkly）发表了深思熟虑的评论。在该书中，我从哲学角度为间谍和反间谍活动辩护。至于如何更好地实施我所捍卫的道德规范，使其能够在我们所熟知的世界中指导情报人员的行动，我却知之甚少。与此相关的是，对于国内法和国际法是否应反映和巩固这些准则，我也几乎无话可说。戴维-奥曼德（David Omand）和斯蒂芬-拉特纳（Stephen Ratner）的文章试图填补这些空白。首先，我将考虑拉斯-克里斯蒂对我关于欺骗伦理的观点所提出的质疑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Espionage, Ethics, and Law: From Philosophy to Practice

In this paper, I respond to Lars Christie, David Omand and Stephen Ratner for their thoughtful comments on my book Spying through a Glass Darkly. In that book, I provide a philosophical defence of espionage and counter-intelligence activities. I have little to say about how best to implement the moral norms I defend so that they can help guide intelligence officers’ actions, in the world as we know it here and now. Relatedly, I have little if anything to say about whether domestic and international law should reflect and entrench those norms. These are the gaps which David Omand’s and Stephen Ratner’s contributions seek to fill. First, though, I consider Lars Christie’s probing objections to my views on the ethics of deception.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Criminal Law and Philosophy LAW-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Rationale The philosophy of crime and criminal law has been undergoing a renaissance.Increasing numbers of lawyers and philosophers are researching, writing and teaching in the area. Lawyers who are exploring theoretical issues related to criminal liability and punishment find that they must turn to philosophy. Philosophers recognise the importance of the criminal law as a focus for both analytical and normative inquiry. The practical importance of the subject is also obvious, especially at a time when western governments are having to reconsider their rationales for criminalization and sentencing in the light of substantial changes in criminal justice systems and their social contexts. Until recently, there was no journal solely devoted to the philosophy of crime and criminal law. Criminal Law and Philosophy fills this gap, and provides a platform for the high quality work that is being done in this area. High quality content; specific and inclusive in scope Criminal Law and Philosophy aims to publish high quality articles that take a philosophical perspective on any issues in the broad field of crime and punishment. The main areas and topics include: crime and criminalization; the content, principles and structure of substantive criminal law; criminal justice and the criminal process; punishment and sentencing. The journal is inclusive in its scope: it publishes articles with a historical focus on earlier philosophical discussions of crime and punishment, as well as articles with a more contemporary focus. It seeks contributions from a range of philosophical schools and approaches, in particular both from analytically oriented philosophers and from those who draw more on contemporary continental philoshophy. Readership Criminal Law and Philosophy is becoming essential reading for academics in philoso phy, in law and in criminology who take a philosophically informed critical, analytical or normative approach to the criminal law and criminal justice. It is also an important resource for students in those subjects, and for practitioners with an interest in philosophical approaches to their practice. Through this journal, readers can access the latest thinking by the best scholars in the philosophy of crime and punishment. Editorial Board The editors, editorial board and advisors constitute an impressive, international group of leading scholars working in the philosophy of crime and punishment. They represent a variety of systems of criminal law, including systems that cross national boundaries.

期刊最新文献

Crime, Character, and the Evolution of the Penal Message Criminalisation as a Speech-Act: Saying Through Criminalising Culpability and Moral Vice “Blameworthiness” and “Culpability” are not Synonymous: A Sympathetic Amendment to Simester Espionage and The Harming of Innocents