评估用于血浆 HIV-1 RNA 定量的 ELITechGroup 溶液

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY Journal of Clinical Virology Pub Date : 2024-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105663
Adeline Baron , Alice Moisan , Guillemette Unal , Véronique Lemée , Manuel Etienne , Jean-Christophe Plantier
{"title":"评估用于血浆 HIV-1 RNA 定量的 ELITechGroup 溶液","authors":"Adeline Baron ,&nbsp;Alice Moisan ,&nbsp;Guillemette Unal ,&nbsp;Véronique Lemée ,&nbsp;Manuel Etienne ,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Plantier","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the last few years, many manufacturers have developed new kits for plasma HIV-1 RNA quantification. Recently, a solution consisting of the ELITe InGenius® instrument and the HIV1 ELITe MGB®kit has been commercialized worldwide. Our aim was to compare its clinical performance with the Aptima® HIV-1 Quant Dx kit by Hologic, on a panel of HIV-1 group M circulating variants, representative of viral load levels found during the pre- and post-treatment follow-up of patients. The linearity was evaluated on the AcroMetrix® HIV-1 Panel. Clinical specificity was evaluated on 100 plasma samples negative for HIV; and clinical sensitivity and sequential follow-up were evaluated on 166 HIV-1 positive plasma samples from 126 patients. The linearity data showed a difference obtained for each point of less than 0.2 Log cp/mL. No amplification was found for the 100 HIV negative clinical specimens. The overall agreement between the two kits was 83.7 %; the differences corresponded to a slightly higher detection for the Aptima kit (with more samples detected below the lower limit of quantification). A Bland &amp; Altman analysis of the quantifiable samples showed a mean difference of −0.05 Log and Spearman's coefficient was 0.975. Only six samples presented discrepancies (above 0.5 Log), but these differences were overall similar between the two kits. Our study has shown that the HIV1 ELITe MGB® Kit can be successfully used for the monitoring of patients infected with various epidemic HIV-1 strains, and for the precise quantification of the viral load.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653224000258/pdfft?md5=38f71e94941f74678398f058f65734eb&pid=1-s2.0-S1386653224000258-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the ELITechGroup solution for plasma HIV-1 RNA quantification\",\"authors\":\"Adeline Baron ,&nbsp;Alice Moisan ,&nbsp;Guillemette Unal ,&nbsp;Véronique Lemée ,&nbsp;Manuel Etienne ,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Plantier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the last few years, many manufacturers have developed new kits for plasma HIV-1 RNA quantification. Recently, a solution consisting of the ELITe InGenius® instrument and the HIV1 ELITe MGB®kit has been commercialized worldwide. Our aim was to compare its clinical performance with the Aptima® HIV-1 Quant Dx kit by Hologic, on a panel of HIV-1 group M circulating variants, representative of viral load levels found during the pre- and post-treatment follow-up of patients. The linearity was evaluated on the AcroMetrix® HIV-1 Panel. Clinical specificity was evaluated on 100 plasma samples negative for HIV; and clinical sensitivity and sequential follow-up were evaluated on 166 HIV-1 positive plasma samples from 126 patients. The linearity data showed a difference obtained for each point of less than 0.2 Log cp/mL. No amplification was found for the 100 HIV negative clinical specimens. The overall agreement between the two kits was 83.7 %; the differences corresponded to a slightly higher detection for the Aptima kit (with more samples detected below the lower limit of quantification). A Bland &amp; Altman analysis of the quantifiable samples showed a mean difference of −0.05 Log and Spearman's coefficient was 0.975. Only six samples presented discrepancies (above 0.5 Log), but these differences were overall similar between the two kits. Our study has shown that the HIV1 ELITe MGB® Kit can be successfully used for the monitoring of patients infected with various epidemic HIV-1 strains, and for the precise quantification of the viral load.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653224000258/pdfft?md5=38f71e94941f74678398f058f65734eb&pid=1-s2.0-S1386653224000258-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653224000258\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653224000258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去几年中,许多制造商都开发出了新的血浆 HIV-1 RNA 定量试剂盒。最近,一种由 ELITe InGenius® 仪器和 HIV1 ELITe MGB® 试剂盒组成的解决方案在全球范围内实现了商业化。我们的目的是比较它与 Hologic 公司的 Aptima® HIV-1 Quant Dx 试剂盒在临床上的性能,该试剂盒检测的是一组 HIV-1 M 组循环变体,代表了患者治疗前后随访中发现的病毒载量水平。线性度在 AcroMetrix® HIV-1 Panel 上进行了评估。对 100 份 HIV 阴性血浆样本进行了临床特异性评估;对来自 126 名患者的 166 份 HIV-1 阳性血浆样本进行了临床敏感性和连续随访评估。线性数据显示,每个点的差异均小于 0.2 Log cp/mL。在 100 份 HIV 阴性临床样本中未发现扩增现象。两种试剂盒的总体一致性为 83.7%;差异在于 Aptima 试剂盒的检出率略高(更多样本的检出率低于定量下限)。对可定量样品的 Bland & Altman 分析显示,平均差异为-0.05 Log,斯皮尔曼系数为 0.975。只有六个样本出现差异(超过 0.5 Log),但两种试剂盒之间的差异总体上相似。我们的研究表明,HIV1 ELITe MGB® 检测试剂盒可成功用于监测感染各种流行性 HIV-1 株系的患者,并对病毒载量进行精确定量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the ELITechGroup solution for plasma HIV-1 RNA quantification

In the last few years, many manufacturers have developed new kits for plasma HIV-1 RNA quantification. Recently, a solution consisting of the ELITe InGenius® instrument and the HIV1 ELITe MGB®kit has been commercialized worldwide. Our aim was to compare its clinical performance with the Aptima® HIV-1 Quant Dx kit by Hologic, on a panel of HIV-1 group M circulating variants, representative of viral load levels found during the pre- and post-treatment follow-up of patients. The linearity was evaluated on the AcroMetrix® HIV-1 Panel. Clinical specificity was evaluated on 100 plasma samples negative for HIV; and clinical sensitivity and sequential follow-up were evaluated on 166 HIV-1 positive plasma samples from 126 patients. The linearity data showed a difference obtained for each point of less than 0.2 Log cp/mL. No amplification was found for the 100 HIV negative clinical specimens. The overall agreement between the two kits was 83.7 %; the differences corresponded to a slightly higher detection for the Aptima kit (with more samples detected below the lower limit of quantification). A Bland & Altman analysis of the quantifiable samples showed a mean difference of −0.05 Log and Spearman's coefficient was 0.975. Only six samples presented discrepancies (above 0.5 Log), but these differences were overall similar between the two kits. Our study has shown that the HIV1 ELITe MGB® Kit can be successfully used for the monitoring of patients infected with various epidemic HIV-1 strains, and for the precise quantification of the viral load.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Virology
Journal of Clinical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
1.10%
发文量
149
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice. The journal publishes on topics that include: • new diagnostic technologies • nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing • targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing • emerging pandemic viral threats • respiratory viruses • transplant viruses • chronic viral infections • cancer-associated viruses • gastrointestinal viruses • central nervous system viruses • one health (excludes animal health)
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Circulating serotypes and genotypes of dengue virus during the 2023 outbreak in Eastern Nepal Opportunities and challenges for the U.S. laboratory response to highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) Performance evaluation of the quantitative assay Adenovirus ELITe MGB® Kit on EDTA-plasma, using the ELITe BeGenius® system Influenza C virus in U.S. children with acute respiratory infection 2016–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1