背谈:学术术语和客观性假象

IF 1.3 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Phi Delta Kappan Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1177/00317217241238114
Iris C. Rotberg
{"title":"背谈:学术术语和客观性假象","authors":"Iris C. Rotberg","doi":"10.1177/00317217241238114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although some people view quantitative studies as more legitimate than qualitative studies, both methods are subject to bias, Iris Rotberg explains. The study’s methodological strengths and weaknesses are determined when researchers frame questions, choose samples and outcome measures, and collect data. These design decisions and their implementation are far more important determinants of research validity than are the subsequent data analyses, whether quantitative or qualitative.","PeriodicalId":47826,"journal":{"name":"Phi Delta Kappan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Backtalk: Academic jargon and the illusion of objectivity\",\"authors\":\"Iris C. Rotberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00317217241238114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although some people view quantitative studies as more legitimate than qualitative studies, both methods are subject to bias, Iris Rotberg explains. The study’s methodological strengths and weaknesses are determined when researchers frame questions, choose samples and outcome measures, and collect data. These design decisions and their implementation are far more important determinants of research validity than are the subsequent data analyses, whether quantitative or qualitative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phi Delta Kappan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phi Delta Kappan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217241238114\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phi Delta Kappan","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217241238114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Iris Rotberg 解释说,虽然有些人认为定量研究比定性研究更合法,但这两种方法都会出现偏差。研究人员在提出问题、选择样本和结果测量方法以及收集数据时,就决定了研究方法的优缺点。无论是定量还是定性分析,这些设计决策及其实施都是研究有效性的重要决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Backtalk: Academic jargon and the illusion of objectivity
Although some people view quantitative studies as more legitimate than qualitative studies, both methods are subject to bias, Iris Rotberg explains. The study’s methodological strengths and weaknesses are determined when researchers frame questions, choose samples and outcome measures, and collect data. These design decisions and their implementation are far more important determinants of research validity than are the subsequent data analyses, whether quantitative or qualitative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phi Delta Kappan
Phi Delta Kappan EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: Kappan magazine is a benefit of membership in Phi Delta Kappa. As a PDK member, you’ll receive Kappan magazine in both print and digital format eight times a year. In addition, you receive complete online access to Kappan archives, as well as access to PDKConnect, the online community where you can comment on any Kappan article, join webinars with Kappan authors, and exchange ideas with other individuals as passionate about education as you are. Kappan does not sell individual subscriptions.
期刊最新文献
Creating a space for regulation and reflection Federal focus on education initiatives wins broad public support Findings from the 56th annual PDK Poll First Person: Sticker politics What do adults know about public education? PDK Connection: Organizational news about PDK International
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1