行为分析的伦理前景 Reddit 上的论坛

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavior Analysis in Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1007/s40617-024-00921-5
Richard A. Price, Melanie R Martin Loya, Rebecca Folkerts, Ban S. Haidar
{"title":"行为分析的伦理前景 Reddit 上的论坛","authors":"Richard A. Price, Melanie R Martin Loya, Rebecca Folkerts, Ban S. Haidar","doi":"10.1007/s40617-024-00921-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) released the third iteration of ethical practice guidelines for certificants, which went into effect on January 1, 2022. This <i>Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts</i> (hereafter <i>Ethics Code</i>) is streamlined and more enforceable than its predecessors, with the continued overarching directive to improve consumer protection. In the decades after the BACB was founded, the internet and social media have become ubiquitous in daily life, including within applied behavior analysis (ABA). Social media can benefit ABA stakeholders by providing access to enhanced professional networks, practitioner resources, and study guides or social support for behavior analysis students. However, the use of social media leads to a potentially increased risk of ethical concerns. Therefore, the authors of this article sought to explore how behavioral products in ABA social media forums on Reddit align with the <i>Ethics Code</i>. Findings suggest that most user engagement in ABA subreddit is ethical, but users also engage in ways that potentially misalign with the <i>Ethics Code</i>. Finally, the authors describe implications for future research and practice to promote ethical user engagement online by ABA practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":47310,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ethical Landscape of Behavior Analysis Forums on Reddit\",\"authors\":\"Richard A. Price, Melanie R Martin Loya, Rebecca Folkerts, Ban S. Haidar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40617-024-00921-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) released the third iteration of ethical practice guidelines for certificants, which went into effect on January 1, 2022. This <i>Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts</i> (hereafter <i>Ethics Code</i>) is streamlined and more enforceable than its predecessors, with the continued overarching directive to improve consumer protection. In the decades after the BACB was founded, the internet and social media have become ubiquitous in daily life, including within applied behavior analysis (ABA). Social media can benefit ABA stakeholders by providing access to enhanced professional networks, practitioner resources, and study guides or social support for behavior analysis students. However, the use of social media leads to a potentially increased risk of ethical concerns. Therefore, the authors of this article sought to explore how behavioral products in ABA social media forums on Reddit align with the <i>Ethics Code</i>. Findings suggest that most user engagement in ABA subreddit is ethical, but users also engage in ways that potentially misalign with the <i>Ethics Code</i>. Finally, the authors describe implications for future research and practice to promote ethical user engagement online by ABA practitioners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Analysis in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Analysis in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00921-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00921-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行为分析师认证委员会(BACB)发布了第三版行为分析师职业道德准则,并于 2022 年 1 月 1 日生效。本《行为分析师道德规范》(以下简称《道德规范》)与之前的《道德规范》相比,更加精简,更具有可执行性,并继续以加强消费者保护为首要任务。在 BACB 成立后的几十年里,互联网和社交媒体在日常生活中无处不在,包括在应用行为分析 (ABA) 领域。社交媒体可以为行为分析专业的学生提供增强的专业网络、从业人员资源、学习指南或社会支持,从而使行为分析专业的利益相关者受益。然而,社交媒体的使用可能会增加道德问题的风险。因此,本文作者试图探索 Reddit 上 ABA 社交媒体论坛中的行为产品如何与《道德规范》保持一致。研究结果表明,大多数用户在 ABA subreddit 中的参与是符合道德规范的,但用户的参与方式也有可能与《道德规范》不一致。最后,作者阐述了未来研究和实践对促进 ABA 从业人员在线道德用户参与的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Ethical Landscape of Behavior Analysis Forums on Reddit

The Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) released the third iteration of ethical practice guidelines for certificants, which went into effect on January 1, 2022. This Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts (hereafter Ethics Code) is streamlined and more enforceable than its predecessors, with the continued overarching directive to improve consumer protection. In the decades after the BACB was founded, the internet and social media have become ubiquitous in daily life, including within applied behavior analysis (ABA). Social media can benefit ABA stakeholders by providing access to enhanced professional networks, practitioner resources, and study guides or social support for behavior analysis students. However, the use of social media leads to a potentially increased risk of ethical concerns. Therefore, the authors of this article sought to explore how behavioral products in ABA social media forums on Reddit align with the Ethics Code. Findings suggest that most user engagement in ABA subreddit is ethical, but users also engage in ways that potentially misalign with the Ethics Code. Finally, the authors describe implications for future research and practice to promote ethical user engagement online by ABA practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Behavior Analysis in Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
自引率
18.20%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Behavior Analysis in Practice, an official journal of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, is a peer-reviewed translational publication designed to provide science-based, best-practice information relevant to service delivery in behavior analysis. The target audience includes front-line service workers and their supervisors, scientist-practitioners, and school personnel. The mission of Behavior Analysis in Practice is to promote empirically validated best practices in an accessible format that describes not only what works, but also the challenges of implementation in practical settings. Types of articles and topics published  include empirical reports describing the application and evaluation of behavior-analytic procedures and programs; discussion papers on professional and practice issues; technical articles on methods, data analysis, or instrumentation in the practice of behavior analysis; tutorials on terms, procedures, and theories relevant to best practices in behavior analysis; and critical reviews of books and products that are aimed at practitioners or consumers of behavior analysis.
期刊最新文献
Facilitating Greater Understanding of Trauma-Informed Care in Applied Behavior Analysis: An Introduction to the Special Issue. The Effectiveness of Khan Academy in Teaching Elementary Math Procedural Integrity in Applied Settings: A Survey of Training, Practices, and Barriers Introducing "In Their Own Words" Special Series. Barriers to Careers in Behavior Analysis among Hispanic and Latinx Undergraduate Students: A Preliminary Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1